geek
Recently Viewed
Hot Games
Agricola
Age of Conan: The Strategy Board Game
Race for the Galaxy: The Gathering Storm
Name of the Rose, The
A Touch of Evil, The Supernatural Game
Race for the Galaxy
Conflict of Heroes: Awakening the Bear! - Russia 1941-1942
Sturm Europa!
Arkham Horror
Settlers of Catan, The
Der Hexer von Salem
Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
Galaxy Trucker
Battlestar Galactica
Puerto Rico
War of the Ring
Pandemic
Power Grid
Stone Age
Carcassonne
StarCraft: The Board Game
Last Night on Earth: The Zombie Game
Dominion
Risk
Through the Ages: A Story of Civilization
Descent: Journeys in the Dark
Twilight Struggle
Scrabble
Tigris & Euphrates
Monsterpocalypse
BattleLore
Age of Empires III: The Age of Discovery
Twilight Imperium 3rd Edition
Le Havre
Bakugan Battle Brawlers
Caylus
Space Alert
Agricola X-Deck
Railroad Tycoon
Tomb
Ticket to Ride
Hannibal: Rome vs. Carthage
Chinatown
Agricola - Im Wandel der Jahreszeiten
Commands & Colors: Ancients
Age of Steam
Clue
Jericho
Monopoly
Game of Life, The
Rules | Subscriptions | Bookmarks | Search | Account | Moderators
Recommend
2
5 Posts
New Thread | Printer Friendly | Subscribe | Bookmark
Your Tags: Login to Add Tags | View 
Popular Tags: [View All]
Greg Schloesser
flag
Avatar
04060708
Design by: JonMichael Rasmus, John Sams and Sean Weitner
Published by: Out of the Box
4 – 10 Players, 20 – 30 minutes
Review by: Greg J. Schloesser


Lately, I have been “re-discovering” party-style games. These are games that are generally played at social gatherings, where the emphasis is placed on group involvement and fun, and often involve team play. Games such as Pictionary, Trivial Pursuit, Cranium, Taboo, Time’s Up, Scattergories, Eye to Eye, etc. – all are good examples of party games that are well suited for parties and other social gatherings.

I was intrigued when I heard about Cineplexity, a new party game from Out of the Box that possesses a movie theme. I am a fan of movies, generally preferring to watch them as opposed to television series or other programs. I’ve been known to go to the cinema alone in order to catch a movie that my wife isn’t too keen to see. So, a game that requires players to recall names of movies that fit certain criteria seemed to be just my style.

The concept is very simple: two cards from the massive deck of 500+ cards are revealed, each listing one or more elements. These can include settings, scenes, actors, locations, props, theme, genres, characters, etc. For example, one card might say “Playing Golf”, while the second card says “French, Italian or Caesar”. The object is to be the first player or team to correctly shout the name of a film that contains these elements. If players are unable to recall a film containing those elements, a third card is revealed, and players must identify a film containing elements from two of the three cards. A correct answer is rewarded by receiving one of the two (or three) cards, each of which is worth one point.

Each turn, one player serves as the “Director”, and he must judge whether the answer given is correct. Of course, if he is not aware of the film named, he must either believe the player giving the answer, or decline the answer. Thus, players who have a greater knowledge of movies will have a distinct advantage … but only if the director is aware of the movies they name. Otherwise, they can be constantly shot-down, even though they know they are correct. This can be quite frustrating. It is equally frustrating to be involved in a game wherein one or two players are movie buffs and dominate the proceedings.

The game continues in this fashion until one player or team collects the required number of points, which ranges from 6 – 10, depending upon the number of players. Fortunately, this is usually a quick exercise, taking 20 – 30 minutes to accomplish. Much longer would have left me begging for an intermission or an early exit.

Clearly the game is designed to invoke discussions and debates over the movies named, with players arguing back and forth whether particular elements are indeed present in the movie named. Players often respond in shock that their opponents or teammates have not seen a movie they consider a “classic”. This does occur, but in my experience, it was usually short, quick comments, with no lengthy and entertaining discussions. The game just failed to evoke the response and reaction it appears designed to accomplish.

Sadly, I was HUGELY disappointed by the game. It is an exercise in quick recall, and it just lacks fun. I played with groups who generally enjoy movies, and it fell completely flat. There was little excitement, and we were often stumped by the strange combination of elements. Every now and then a clever answer would be offered, resulting in some congratulatory remarks. For the most part, however, the game lacked the excitement and tension present in many other top party games.

In spite of my personal “thumbs-down”, I can see the game having fairly wide appeal, particularly amongst those who enjoy Out of the Box’s mega-hit Apples-to-Apples. Unlike Apples-to-Apples, which can be played by anyone without any specific knowledge of a particular field, Cineplexity does require a decent knowledge of movies. This alone will somewhat limit its appeal. Still, it does seem to have many of the elements that some folks seem to seek in party games, particularly the ability to serve as a conversation starter. I, on the other hand, seek more from the games I play … even party games. I want the game to be engaging in-and-of-itself, and not simply a catalyst for initiating conversations. However, I believe I’m in the minority in this regards, and fully expect Cineplexity to be well-received by the general public.


Last edited on 2007-08-11 14:23:05 CST (Total Number of Edits: 1)
Tim Koffley
flag
Avatar
0405060708
gschloesser wrote:
For example, one card might say “Playing Golf”, while the second card says “French, Italian or Caesar”.

Roman Golf Holiday, DUH! :D

Nice review. Too bad the game didn't turn out so great. The description sounded like it might have broader appeal despite the specific subject. And, of course, like any party game the experience can really depend on the particular mix of people and their mood at the time so it will be interesting to hear other opinions.
Chris Bailey
flag
Avatar
05
Yeah, I love movies and played with 4 friends who love them too and we were all very nonplussed.
Tim Koffley
flag
Avatar
0405060708
ixnay66 wrote:
Yeah, I love movies and played with 4 friends who love them too and we were all very nonplussed.

Do you mean 'unimpressed' or 'nonplussed'? If the latter, what confused you about the game?
Cedric Chin
flag
Avatar
We had quite the reverse experience, but use this variant:

1. The person who answers becomes the Director. This prevents players with more movie knowledge from answering more often.

2. First person to give a **reasonable** answer wins. If the Director is not have to be familiar with the answer, the answerer merely has to explain it. Play as quickly as possible.

3. Whoever answers receives the cards. At the end of the game, whoever has the highest stack of cards wins. This is just a faster way of scoring.

4. In case of a tie, both players receive a card (or half the cards), and the Judge does not change. If the tie involves an odd number of cards, the extra card is tossed back into the deck.

We also had only short quick comments about the answers, but this was definitely fun, as many of us didn't realize such movies existed or that these familiar movies had the two dissimilar elements. I think the key to playing this game is to play the game *fast*. I think I was able to get the pace down to three seconds per answer.

But I would still recommend this game *after* Apples to Apples, because, as said, of AtA's broader appeal.


aka. Washu! ^O^
 
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
BoardGameGeek and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.