geek
Rules | Subscriptions | Bookmarks | Search | Account | Moderators
Recommend
13 Posts
New Thread | Printer Friendly | Subscribe  | Bookmark
Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
spiked shrike
flag
Lord of the Rings: The Confrontation » Forums » Rules
Nasty Sidestep Retreat
Lo people,

First post after my first three games. Had a situation which can't be resolved nicely from the rule book or the faq or previous posts and I wondered if there was any given wisdom for the situation encountered?

My wife had my Frodo backed into a corner, in front of him both Saruman and the Balrog: so no way forward for poor old Frodo. She could not lose. We were down to one card each: I had a Numerical one card, so I'm basically dead in the water; she moved her Balrog into Frodo's territoy and I'm about to move out, ready to be taken out by Saruman next turn when I notice her card is the Text Retreat: this is a card she MUST play and effect BEFORE mine. Playing strictly by the rules the Balrog sidesteps out of the square, no combat takes place and now nothing can stop Frodo marching down the board to victory.

Does this seem stupid to anyone else?
Matthew M. Monin
flag
BGG Admin
Avatar
040506070809
Re:Nasty Sidestep Retreat
spiked (#17759),

The foolishness is in being left with that useless card and giving Frodo an opportunity to escape. You did well to recognize that you were better served to actually face the Balrog, since you had heard through the grapevine that he had a streak of cowardice and all Frodo needed to do was dance menacingly to make the big bully run away.

-MMM
spiked shrike
flag
Re:Nasty Sidestep Retreat
Octavian (#17783),

Well I had heard the Balrog was full of hot air.....


spiked shrike
flag
Re:Nasty Sidestep Retreat
...but seriously: do you think she should be forced to obey the text card?
Aleister Finchley
flag
Avatar
04
Re:Nasty Sidestep Retreat
spiked (#17786),
Well, those are the rules. But tell her she won, if it makes her happy.
Bruce Glassco
flag
Re:Nasty Sidestep Retreat
I thought that Frodo's retreat takes place before cards are played -- in fact, there would be no combat, because Frodo would retreat sideways immediately. What am I missing?
Greg Aleknevicus
flag
Re:Nasty Sidestep Retreat
Bruce Gee (#17791),

You are missing the fact that Frodo's ability is optional. Most of the time you will want to use it but in certain, rare circumstances (such as the one described) the good player may decline to do so.
John Snyderâ„¢
flag
Avatar
0405060708
Re:Nasty Sidestep Retreat
Maybe I am mistaken also, but it seems to me that if she'd attacked you with Saruman, she could have skipped the card-playing phase and just smooshed the little bugger. Not to insult your wife by any means, but it seems from your description that she just attacked with the weaker piece for the situation.

John
Matthew M. Monin
flag
BGG Admin
Avatar
040506070809
Re:Nasty Sidestep Retreat
CapAp (#20053),
I interpreted it to mean that Frodo's sideways retreat would have put him into Saruman's path.

-MMM
Jeff Hoffman
flag
Avatar
0506070809
Re:Nasty Sidestep Retreat
spiked (#17759),

Reading your scenario very carefully, Frodo should have died. You stated that "Frodo [is] backed into a corner" and that "in front of him both Saruman and the Balrog; so no way forward for poor old Frodo." The only place on the board that could happen is that Frodo is in Bag End and that Arthedain and Cardolan are occupied by Saruman and Balrog. Assuming that IS the correct setup, as soon as Balrog moved into Bag End with Frodo (and Frodo cannot retreat sideways because Bag End is a corner space), your numerical one card was revealed along with Balrog's Retreat card. Balrog cannot retreat sideways, so the card is ignored. The numerical one is added to Frodo's base power of one for a total of two. Frodo = 2, Balrog = 5, Frodo dies.

~Jeff
Matthew M. Monin
flag
BGG Admin
Avatar
040506070809
Re:Nasty Sidestep Retreat
Gamemaster (#20327),

I believe the author was using "backed into a corner" as a figure of speech. You'll note that he had contemplated using Frodo's sidestepping power before realizing that the only card left for the opponent was Retreat. Obviously this could not have taken place in Bag End.


-MMM
Andy B
flag
Re:Nasty Sidestep Retreat
I have the same question.

Let's simplify it a bit though first.

Dark player attacks light player. Assume that the battle makes it to the card playing and that each player only has one card left. The dark player has a retreat card. It doesn't matter what the light player has for this question. Assume that the dark player would win the battle if he didn't retreat. Must the dark player obey the text on the retreat card, thus running away from a battle that he would have won, or may he choose to ignore it?

My wife (the light player) determined that if the dark player were allowed to ignore the card's text then the dark player would be able to use the retreat card as a way of "scouting" the light player's card and then if the dark player determines that he can win if he ignores his played card then he'll just ignore it. Otherwise the dark player would just retreat. This really would seem unfair.

We decided that a card played is a card played and the dark player in this case MUST retreat. We figured that Pippin (the light character in our example) had tricked the Balrog (again, in our example) into thinking that he (Pippin) was a big and nasty creature so the 'Rog decided to turn tail. The lesson learned was to not get stuck with a retreat card when you must play it and you don't want to retreat (unless you can't retreat, etc).
marc magner
flag
Avatar
0506070809
Re:Nasty Sidestep Retreat
UncleBuck (#20391),


Your decision was/is correct. All players must abide by their cards.

The only time the dark player could ignore the card text is if they are unable to carry out the action. For example, if the dark player played the retreat in the mountains, the retreat would be ignored since a character can not move sideways in the mountain.

hope this helps.

Marc M
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
BoardGameGeek and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.