geek
The Hotness
Games|People|Company
Rules | Subscriptions | Bookmarks | Search | Account | Moderators
Recommend
31
8 Posts
Subject: Short review rss
New Thread | Printer Friendly | Subscribe  sub options | Bookmark
Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Pedro
Portugal
Lisbon
flag msg tools
Avatar
patron08
mbmbmbmbmb
Phoenicia » Forums » Reviews
Short review
Phoenicia is a build-your-economy game based on Outpost, an older game still appreciated by a lot of people. According to the elder scrolls of gaming knowledge Tom Lehmann, Phoenicia's designer, started with Outpost and tried to remove everything that wasn't fundamental to the game.

I've never played Outpost or Zepter von Zavandor, which is also based on the old classic, so I can't say if he was successful or not. What I can say is that Phoenicia is really a bare bones design, where everything was streamlined and all the fat removed. As a result, resources are very, very tight and all the decisions really matter. It's a really concentrated design that provides a very good punch in an hour or less.

I'm not going to go into too many details about the rules, because I think that's the job of the rulebook.

Simply put, this is an auction game. Players start with some basic knowledge (farming, hunting, storage and worker training) represented by big cardboard tiles and some workers, represented by the dreaded white plastic pawns. Two of these workers are already trained and working at the start of the game (one's hunting and the other is farming) and provide an initial production and some points.

Players also start with some production cards (equivalent to money) which they'll use to buy technologies in an auction. These technologies (things like glassmaking, granaries, shipyards, etc) bring several kinds of benefits: some unlock more productive activities like mining or clothmaking or upgrade existing activities to their improved or advanced equivalents, while others just increase production and/or points. There are also technologies that provide more workers and expanded storage. Players cannot buy workers directly and as a result the little buggers will be a very scarce resource. You'll spend a lot of time wishing for more ugly white plastic pawns!

A player's turn is a simple cycle: starting with the overlord, a player can put one or more cards for auction, if there are any available and the player has money for the initial bid (each card has a minimum value). Then he can train workers and assign them to activities, paying the associated cost. After the player has completed his turn he's not allowed to enter further auctions during the round and play proceeds to the player on the left.

After all players have completed their turns, there's a common bookkeeping fase. Players get cards according to their current production and storage limits are enforced. If someone has more cards in his hand or coins in his treasury than storage allows, he's forced to discard. Replacement technologies for those auctioned are drawn and a new turn begins. The new overlord is the player in the lead

I have to say that I like this one a lot! The rules are very simple (although a little bit difficult to read), but the game presents a very high density of very tough decisions, turn after turn. As said before resources are very tight and every cent counts. Overbidding can ruin a player's chances of winning and sometimes it's just better to save money instead of buying something. I really like that there are several dimensions to the game's economy so players are forced to balance things out. For instance, if you forget to upgrade your storage, you'll be forced to discard most of your production and all your expensive workers and production technologies will be useless.

It reminds me of Goa, another well regarded "build your economy" game, where the same kind of balance is needed for ships and spices. In fact I think there are several other similarities to Goa: in both games you must buy stuff that improves your efficiency and then put that stuff to good use. However I think Phoenicia is more unforgiving. If you fail to buy a certain tile in Goa there's always an almost as good alternative, so the player isn't really hurt most of the time. Goa is all about having a plan A and a lot of plan Bs that are used everytime plan A fails. In Phoenicia, on the other hand, fail to buy a crucial tech and you can suffer a world of pain, as you see all your activities rotting without workers to man them or part of your precious production wasted because you don't have enough storage! This is actually a good thing, in my opinion, because it encourages players to pay close attention to each other's games and use aggressive auctioning as a weapon. As a result, there are some really tense auctions during the game!

The downside of all this is that Phoenicia can be an awful game for newbies to play. Players need to know the cards and the whole flow of the game to have a chance to do well and a newbie will always be crushed by the experienced player. This isn't a problem if players were aware of this from the start but otherwise can be a little frustrating. I have the feeling that this has something to do with some of the "runaway leader" threads posted in these forums.

To sum it up, I think this is a very good game. It packs a lot of interesting decisions and tense auctions in less than one hour. Components could be better but are perfectly acceptable and the rules are poorly written but not nearly as bad as I feared based on what I'd read here. I give it a solid 8, but it can go up with further plays!
Last edited on 2007-11-06 10:59:01 CST (Total Number of Edits: 1)
Kevin Sussman
United States
Los Angeles
California
flag msg tools
Avatar
patron070809
mbmbmbmbmb
Great review! I wish more reviews were like this. Many people on this site post "reviews" that are more like pages of dry game rules capped off with a line or two at the end like, "Overall I found the game to be quite enjoyable." Thanks for not doing that. Although you titled this post "Short review," I found it to be more meaty than many, much lengthier posts that ultimately fail to give any indication of whether a reader might have any interest in making a purchase.

Note to self: write a general post regarding game reviews that are really just people drudging through pages of rules. Isn't there a separate forum for rules as opposed to reviews?

Sorry for going off topic. Great review though. And I loved the comparisons to Goa! Thanks!
David desJardins
United States
Burlingame
California
flag msg tools
Avatar
040506070809
mbmbmbmbmb
pitris wrote:
The downside of all this is that Phoenicia can be an awful game for newbies to play. Players need to know the cards and the whole flow of the game to have a chance to do well and a newbie will always be crushed by the experienced player.


I have played Phoenicia about 3 or 4 times, with a mix of newbies and experienced players, and a newbie almost always won.
Henri Harju
Finland
Oulu
flag msg tools
Avatar
patron070809
mbmbmbmbmb
DaviddesJ wrote:
pitris wrote:
The downside of all this is that Phoenicia can be an awful game for newbies to play. Players need to know the cards and the whole flow of the game to have a chance to do well and a newbie will always be crushed by the experienced player.


I have played Phoenicia about 3 or 4 times, with a mix of newbies and experienced players, and a newbie almost always won.


I see two possibilities. You take too easy on him/them or your newbies are hardcore gamers that learn fast. In my experience new players were doing okay at most.
Pedro
Portugal
Lisbon
flag msg tools
Avatar
patron08
mbmbmbmbmb
DaviddesJ wrote:

I have played Phoenicia about 3 or 4 times, with a mix of newbies and experienced players, and a newbie almost always won.


We've played a few games whith an experienced player against 2 or 3 newbies and the experienced player always won easily. It wasn't a problem because all the newbies liked the game and wanted to play again immediatly.

Maybe I'm a lousy teacher and failed to convey the important stuff to the new guys.
Jacob Lee
Canada
Victoria
British Columbia
flag msg tools
question
Could you see someone finding the resemblance to Goa TOO close? (i.e. Could someone find Goa not worth holding onto if they have Phoenicia?)

Thanks.
David desJardins
United States
Burlingame
California
flag msg tools
Avatar
040506070809
mbmbmbmbmb
EmperorJacob wrote:
Could you see someone finding the resemblance to Goa TOO close? (i.e. Could someone find Goa not worth holding onto if they have Phoenicia?)


The auction mechanism in Goa (one player controls the auction, the buyer plays him rather than paying the bank, unless the auctioneer wins) is very different from Phoenicia and most auction games, it makes the feel of the game very different, and I think they will appeal to different people.
Pedro
Portugal
Lisbon
flag msg tools
Avatar
patron08
mbmbmbmbmb
EmperorJacob wrote:
Could you see someone finding the resemblance to Goa TOO close? (i.e. Could someone find Goa not worth holding onto if they have Phoenicia?)

Thanks.


I think the games feel different enough to justify owning both. The big difference between the 2 games is the auction mechanism: in Goa you pay the owner of the tile, while in Phoenicia the money goes to the bank and the whole "I select what's auctioned and in what order" thing reminds more of Princes of Florence.

I think Goa is an outstanding 2p game, with a lot of possible strategies and will probably work better with only 2 players (although I've never tried 2p Phoenicia, so I could be wrong). With more than 2 players I prefer Phoenicia's tightness and more strategic approach. With more than 2 Goa becomes much more tactical and forgiving... and I don't like it as much.

Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
BoardGameGeek and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.