geek
The Hotness
Games|People|Company
Rules | Subscriptions | Bookmarks | Search | Account | Moderators
Seth Owen
United States
Norwich
Connecticut
flag msg tools
Avatar
patron08
mbmbmbmbmb
Dixie - Bull Run » Forums » Reviews
Reviewing collectible games from a wargamer's perspective -- Dixe Bull Run
Columbia Games was actually one of the first companies to jump on the Collectible Game bandwagon, publishing Dixie" Shiloh in 1994.

On the other hand, Dixie wasn't a whole-hearted CCG in the form we've become accustomed to over the years.

For one thing, the game eschews the whole rarity thing. While randomly sorted for packaging, all the cards are equally rare (or common). This made collecting a full set somewhat less daunting. In addition, there aren't really a lot of different kinds of cards. The vast majority of the cards are infantry with "combat values" of 1 to 4. Most of the balance of the cards are leaders and artillery, with a handful of cavalry units. There are a few terrain cards and 23 "special" cards, which are the only ones "played" to affect various game functions. All the generals, infantry, artillery and cavalry cards are used to maneuver and fight on a notional battlefield divided into left, center and right sectors for each army.

Indeed, the combat system is basically a copy of the tactical battle board system used in Bobby Lee and similar to the tactical system of Napoleon.

As such this game is very familiar territory for wargamers. Deck construction is fairly straightforward. There are no killer card combos or any such considerations. Instead the player uses the available battle points to select a mix of cards. Both sides deploy their initial "muster" on the board with any additional cards arriving as reinforcements.

Players can "fire" their guns cross the "middle ground at the op[posing array and send infantry and cavalry units across the "middle ground" in an attempt to seize the enemy's home sectors. If an army captures two out of the three enemy home sectors they win.

Combat in all cases involves rolling as many dice as the unit;s combat value, with the effectiveness of that fire depending upon the type of unit. For example, infantry units fire at "F2" which means a die roll of 1 or 2 hits. For every hit a unit has taken it has to make a morale check at the beginning of its next turn If it rolls more than its CV, modified for any leadership, then it "routs" and is removed from play.

As one can see, larger CV units are doubly powerful, rolling more dice and having a greater chance of passing a morale check. On the other hand, they are also somewhat fragile, in a case of having all ones eggs in a single basket. A single hit followed by a bad die roll can make a 4CV unit run away, wheres it would take 4 hits to clear out four 1 CV units (with a chance that a lucky roll may save one.) Leaders tend to benefit poorer units more. A single 0/1 leader can double the chances that 1CV units will hold their ground defending a position.

Compared to most card games there is very little card interaction between players. Only a couple of special cards can be played to directly affect the opponent's cards (Uniform Confusion, Rebel Yell). No, this is very definitely a wargame, albeit on the abstract side.

One of the more interesting things from a wargamers point of view is the OB and uniform information contained in the game. The entire order of battle of both armies is included in the game, with illustrations of all the regimental uniforms. Bull Run was the first battle of the war and both armies were much more colorful than they would be later on.

There are federal units in gray, rebels in blue and other combinations galore.

Dixie is definitely a wargamers kind of collectible game. It's got the kind of collectibility that should appeal to wargamers -- uniforms and OB while avoiding the kind of annoying collectibility found in many other CCGs such as promo cards, ultra rares and the like.

And if you don't want to do it the hard way, Columbia also offers a one-with-everything set that skips the whole random box scene.

The basic game is a good, introductory level tactical battle game that may appeal to the non-wargaming friends. The large cards highlight the kind of visual attractiveness usually seen in miniatures game and it avoid hexes and other wargamey conventions in favor of a very intuitive right-center-left battlefield.


From my game blog at http://pawnderings.blogspot.com
Mike NZ
New Zealand
LOTR
New Zealand
flag msg tools
I've played this many many times and it's a fast and furious game. Carnage carnage carnage. If it's realistic at all it's in the amount of casualities that occur during battles.

Beautiful illustrations never fails to please-except when I lose-no fault of the game though-just bad tactics which there are in this game. :cool:
Nigel Wright
United Kingdom
Nottingham
England
flag msg tools
Avatar
040506070809
mbmbmbmbmb
There was an element of rarity in terms of bronze, silver and gold decks but the contents were identical and so essentially meaningless (much the same can be said for collectible card games in general).

On the up side it is possible to use the decks to resolve combat in the two theatre civil war block games.

I only became interested when Columbia made the complete decks available at a sensible, (i.e. clearance) price and got all three games in the series as much for Eric Hotz's excellent artwork as anything else, and they reside to this day in card protector pages (along with the Eagles deck) to be admired and fawned over. Not that much different from the boxed wargames that adorn my bookshelves, I guess.

I guess I'm too old to get excited about collectible cards that don't come with bubblegum.:laugh:
Seth Owen
United States
Norwich
Connecticut
flag msg tools
Avatar
patron08
mbmbmbmbmb
alcazar wrote:
There was an element of rarity in terms of bronze, silver and gold decks but the contents were identical and so essentially meaningless (much the same can be said for collectible card games in general).

On the up side it is possible to use the decks to resolve combat in the two theatre civil war block games.

I only became interested when Columbia made the complete decks available at a sensible, (i.e. clearance) price and got all three games in the series as much for Eric Hotz's excellent artwork as anything else, and they reside to this day in card protector pages (along with the Eagles deck) to be admired and fawned over. Not that much different from the boxed wargames that adorn my bookshelves, I guess.

I guess I'm too old to get excited about collectible cards that don't come with bubblegum.:laugh:


The bronze, silver and gold scheme was introduced in Eagles: Waterloo which I will be reviewing later. In the civil war games, Bull Run, Shiloh and Gettysburg there was no "rarity."
Harvester of Eyes.
United States
Louisville
Kentucky
flag msg tools
Avatar
0506070809
mbmbmbmbmb
I really enjoyed this game. I have all the others in the series but Bull Run is my favorite. Because I collected all the sets the hard way, one deck at a time, like most of the local war gamers back then I had plenty of extra cards. I have one complete set of each game in ring binders, one set of each game for actually playing and another box of all the triplicates for all three ACW games, Bull Run, Shiloh and Gettysburg, combined. That box is labeled Bull-Shi-ttysburg.

Last edited on 2009-01-05 20:30:20 CST (Total Number of Edits: 1)
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
BoardGameGeek and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.