geek
Rules | Subscriptions | Bookmarks | Search | Account | Moderators
Recommend
4 Posts
New Thread | Printer Friendly | Subscribe  | Bookmark
Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
kris wolff
flag
Game Designer
06070809
Löwenherz » Forums » Variants
Literally move renegade knights
We ran across a situation where I was out of knights, but she wasn't. She then wanted to use a Renegade card and both of us were disappointed that this was actually BENEFITIAL to me because I then got one of my knights back.

So, we play with this variant: when removing, for example, a red knight to "renegade it" to a purple region, we literally move the red knight to purple's region, instead of removing the red and placing a purple... It looks a little odd, but the play is much better and the whole idea of a renegade "defecting" to the other side makes a lot more sense...
Nathanael Straight
flag
Avatar
I like this idea a lot.
John Paul Sodusta
flag
Avatar
0708
Yeah, I like this a lot as well. Going to try this variant next time we play.

Hrrmm... further thought, this makes Renegade even much more powerful. Playing a Renegade will always be a no brainer action when you use it. With the current rules, you have to actually decide what is more beneficial in the situation you described.
ozan ozlek
flag
It may be a little late to reply but here is my opinion about it.

In game you are limited to 12 knights and that actually means your kingdom(or princedom) has a supply limit to support 12 knights..So if you lose a knight you simply don't have to feed him any more and you have room to recruit another one..So I think the old way is better but a nice variant though...

Oozai
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
BoardGameGeek and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.