The Hotness
Games|People|Company
Dominion: Dark Ages
Total War
Mage Knight: Board Game
Fantastiqa
Libertalia
The Lord of the Rings: Nazgul
Descent: Journeys in the Dark (Second Edition)
Eclipse
Mice and Mystics
Doctor Who: The Card Game
Lords of Waterdeep
Star Wars: X-Wing Miniatures Game
Agricola: All Creatures Big and Small
Dungeon Fighter
Android: Netrunner
Virgin Queen
A Game of Thrones: The Board Game (Second Edition)
Glory to Rome
Infiltration
Collapsible D: The Final Minutes of the Titanic
Dominion
The Lord of the Rings: The Card Game
Twilight Struggle
City of Horror
Snowdonia
1989: Dawn of Freedom
Goa
Sherlock Holmes Consulting Detective
Agricola
Among the Stars
7 Wonders: Cities
7 Wonders
The Swarm
Through the Ages: A Story of Civilization
Arkham Horror
Village
Ora et Labora
Battles of Westeros: House Baratheon Army Expansion
Race for the Galaxy
War of the Ring
Trajan
Kingdom Builder
The Castles of Burgundy
Zombicide
Twilight Imperium (third edition)
Space Alert
Dungeon Command: Sting of Lolth
Hacienda
Battlestar Galactica
Ground Floor

Yet Another Boardgaming Blog...

General gaming related nonsense!
Recommend
56 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up

Star Trek: Expeditions - To badly go where many designers have gone before...

Steve Berger
United Kingdom
Borough Green
Kent
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
These are my thoughts after a single play, and should be taken exactly as that. We were playing under the instructions of a member of the Esdevium team at the UK Games Expo. To set the scene, we were in a busy room next to some noisy Daleks, and a Doctor Who look alike with a water pistol.

To start with, the game is based upon the most recent movie. I grew up with the original series, and loved it as a child. I watched and enjoyed most of Next Generation, DS9, and Voyager, but didn’t watch Enterprise. I enjoyed the new film, but find the entire Star Trek world no more than interesting.

How Does It Look?
Well, the miniatures are fantastic. The Klingon ship was my personal favourite, but they are all exceptionally well made. The board however looked dull – a part of a planet’s surface as seen from space, and it lacked any real definition. The board is divided into section by the addition of some white lines, rather than try and make something of the artwork. I would have liked to have seen an aerial view of a futuristic city divided up into districts just to try and help set the scene, but if then this may hamper future scenarios. The spaceship tracks were functional, and took away from the impact of the two ships moving back and forth (mostly back for the Enterprise in our game). The card art was passable, simple, and generally uninteresting, but perfectly functional.

What Is The Setup?
Well, this was already done when we sat down, but the planet’s surface is divided into 15 different territories, and each territory gains a card face-down, and an item that can be used to aid either the Enterprise or the team. All the players start on the enterprise, and Kirk has the first turn.

Additionally, there is a seperate board with three tracks, which shows the final outcome of the game. Each track has a marker to track your successes and failures. Each track has different sections from a good outcome down to a bad outcome – you start there, so have to improve to get a respectable result by game end.

What Do You Do?
Each round a bad thing happens, depending on what level you play at. Then you take actions, such as moving, beaming up or down, taking cards, picking up items, swapping crew, or using a skill. Apologies if I’ve missed anything here – but as per Pandemic, each player had a card showing all their possible actions, with an icon depicting where you needed to be in order to take the action (the surface of the planet or on Enterprise).

When you move to the planet, you reveal the card on your location. This then has a challenge for you to complete, either as part of the main mission, or as a side event. These cards are of a good size, and do have some flavour text. To complete a mission, you look at the type of mission it is, and find your stat from the base of your figure, clearly done by colour. You then add points for any additional ‘skills’ you possess, and also you gain +2 for every other player figure present at your location. To this you add the roll of 2 dice, and you pass or fail. These are regular 6-sided dice, with the exception that 6 has been replaced with 7 (-1). This means you get a 7, but you take 1 wound.

Each time you complete a main mission, how well you do decides which mission is next from the 2 possibilities. The goal is to complete all of the main story missions before either Enterprise is destroyed or the day track reaches the end.

How Does It Play?
The game mechanic is maths and optimisation. Which player has the right stats to complete the missions with the highest score? Who has the right crew members? Who has the right cards? We were told you can talk about cards, but not show them. Crew members are played to the table anyway, so this is open. We were openly stating which cards we had, and each turn was spent calculating who goes in what order. The choices were always obvious, with no subtlety at all, and the theme slipped into the background. We have a yellow 22 mission to complete, but really we want to roll 24 to get the best outcome. Who has the highest overall yellow score? Do they need another player to be there for the +2?

The ‘bad things happen’ cards had no flavour text at all. They simply stated ‘no beaming’ or had the attack symbol, and displayed a number to tell players how many actions they could utilise that turn. Because of the ‘no beaming’ we had a key player stuck on Enterprise, so had to take the next best option, but again this was obvious. Failing a mission meant nothing – you take a wound and try again if you have enough actions, so you simply make sure you allow for this.

We played through the missions, using Spock’s special action to detect where they were amongst the face-down cards. This allowed us to avoid the pitfalls, and concentrate on the missions that needed to be completed. McCoy heals, Kirk moves around, Uhuru gets stuck on the Enterprise. Well, in fairness I’m not fully illustrating the possibilities here, but this is how it worked for us. Kirk has a special ability to pass crew around, which through the card draw we didn’t really feel was necessary (there was always something more important to do) and from memory, Uhuru can hand cards out to other players when she draws them.

How Did We Do?
This was the amusing part – we barely made it through the game because of the pounding the Enterprise took. The shield counters helped a little, but not enough so Enterprise finished on -4, meaning each outcome track moved down 4 points once the final mission was completed. Our result was that the planet was an ecological disaster, with many dead, in the midst of a civil war, and in the control of the Klingons. Pretty catastrophic, I’d say. However, as our final score was 20, we returned to earth with a commendation! Well, again, I didn’t see the rulebook over this, so can only take the demoer’s word for it but really? I know we just sneaked into this bracket by 1 point, but did we really beat the game on our first run through after all feeling we had performed pretty badly?

So?
In each round, each player has a turn in any order, so this allows for a single player to take two turns in a row. This is a good idea, but in practice we found it difficult to remember who had been and who hadn’t and there was probably at least one occasion when a player got skipped, or played before they were allowed to. As the same process happens before each player takes their turn, there was no obvious way of tracking this that we were told about, so this simply created some confusion. Have you been yet? I don’t know – who started the round? This would be very easy to answer – flip your player card once you’ve been for example, but it was a little frustrating.

With the dice rolls, using two dice felt far too random. The possible spread of results this allows for, from 2 to 14, is far too wide a band. Having a lower score to achieve, but only using a single die would help this a little.

The rule about cards is pointless – you can’t show cards to other players, but you can read them out. Each card has no more than a sentence on describing what the card does, so why not just show them to other players rather than reading them out all the time? There is no traitor present, nor is there a winning player at game end which might cause a player to want to keep a card to themselves – you all win, or nobody wins.

This is a backwards step for co-ops. It feels like it should have been designed around the time of Lord Of The Rings, which I would argue is probably an equal game to this, if not a little better – Lord Of The Rings feels more tense than this as the fellowship and the Sauron piece slowly converge. Pandemic has a visual spread of disease cubes, and the tension this causes. With Ghost Stories, Witch Of Salem, and Arkham Horror, you at least see the board filling up with monster cards which helps to generate an impending sense of doom. Battlestar Galactica has thematic board artwork, good miniatures, and evokes the theme throughout – the flavour text on the cards is present when required, and the traitor mechanic makes the game. With Castle Panic, you see your walls and towers tumbling, and the hordes gathering. Shadows Over Camelot has siege engines aiming at your castle walls, Defenders Of The Realm has the spread of evil forces, Forbidden Island has the tiles falling away from under you. So what does Star Trek: Expeditions have that creates this necessary tension? Well, the Klingon ship moves towards you, but if you want, you can move back a space, oh and the date track marker moves down the date track. Also, you can turn the dials on the bases of the figures, but you often have little idea how many turns have been made per figure.

Knizia has done well in the past to prove you don’t need buckets of theme to create a good game. Amun-Re is probably my top rated Knizia, and really it could be attached to most themes in some way or other, but the artwork is good, and the gameplay is excellent. I can understand why, but I feel critical of the fact that Knizia seems to have moved away from creating games for gamers, and is looking at games for the masses. With all the recent Knizia apps, and Lego tie-ins, he has lost what made him great. I understand that nobody is ever going to make their fortune from designing Amun-Re simply because the audience is too small. On the same day, I played Ankh-Morpork, the new Martin Wallace game. Ankh-Morpork is a fairly simple gateway game, and it is excellent, just to prove that this can be done, and done well.

In summary, the miniatures are excellent, the board and cards are functional, and ok, but the game is a real let down. If I owned this game, I’d probably play it at most 3 times as a solo. In contrast, I’ve registered 26 plays of Pandemic, and 9 of BSG and Castle Panic. We may have missed a couple of minor rules or nuances, but on the whole it felt like we were playing the game in the right way – nothing felt too out of place. I’m not saying that I could do better, nor am I intending to just say ‘this is rubbish’ but I feel there are plenty of co-operative games already available that are significantly better than this.

As an additional note to this, I’ve just quickly looked through the rules. The only rule we weren’t told was regarding taking wounds to increase the die rolls. With this rule, we would have finished the game a round earlier, and scored even higher than we did. I’ve also noted that we did get a commendation, and that a score of 0 counts as ‘Mission Complete! You are congratulated and sent on your next mission’. To get 0, the planet joins the Klingon empire, global civil war erupts, much of the eco system is destroyed, and large number of the population die. Congratulations.
Twitter Facebook
17 Comments
Subscribe sub options Tue Jun 7, 2011 1:34 pm
Post Comment
Mark Chaplin
United Kingdom
Nottingham
Ice-choked tower, Mondavia, Nanglangka.
designer
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Thanks for your thoughts. Have a thumb.




1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Posted Tue Jun 7, 2011 1:38 pm
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
Jaime Lawrence
Australia
Sydney
New South Wales
flag msg tools
designer
See Below.
badge
Evil Bob: Lawful good since 2038!
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
That's really unfortunate. I've been dreading the idea that Knizia would ruin Star Trek by making it themeless and it sounds like he has.
3 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Posted Tue Jun 7, 2011 1:52 pm
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
Jon W
United States
Aurora
Colorado
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Hida Mann wrote:
That's really unfortunate. I've been dreading the idea that Knizia would ruin Star Trek by making it themeless and it sounds like he has.

A lot of people feel that way about Lord of the Rings, but I find it very thematic. I suspect this may wind up the same way, very much "in the eye of the beholder".

The victory conditions sound weird to me. Apparently the OP has access to the rules; are they posted somewhere? I thought the goal of the game was to stop all those bad things from happening, so it seems like there might be a disconnect or misunderstanding with the whole final score/congratulations business.

EDIT: Apparently the rules are up at http://wizkidsgames.com/startrek/star-trek-expeditions/. Hadn't seen that.
3 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Edited Tue Jun 7, 2011 3:30 pm
  • Posted Tue Jun 7, 2011 3:28 pm
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
Angela Lammers
United States
Sheboygan
Wisconsin
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Is this a finished version? It sounds so lacking in theme and tension, when theme and tension are the big draws for this game.

Maybe I'll break out Star Munchkin instead. At least that oozes the cheezy theme I expect from anything Star Trek.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Posted Tue Jun 7, 2011 3:39 pm
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
Lee Fisher
United States
Downingtown
Pennsylvania
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Rules also on BGG here:

Star Trek Expeditions EN Rulebook

Were you playing on the easy difficulty?

Also most games of this type have the no showing cards rule (pandemic, etc). It's up to you if you need to use it or not depending on your group.

It seems from the rules that play is just clockwise? Why were you changing the order, if I understood what you meant?

But I am worried about the scoring aspect also. It does seem a bit screwy.
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Edited Tue Jun 7, 2011 4:03 pm
  • Posted Tue Jun 7, 2011 3:52 pm
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
Jon W
United States
Aurora
Colorado
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
OK, read the rules and looked at the mission tracking board, and the scoring makes more sense now. Instead of the "success" baseline being essentially positive, it starts at worst-case and moves up. For instance, the Politics track goes like this:

- (in the red): The planet declares war on the Federation. (You lose).
0-3: The planet joins the Klingon Empire.
4-7: The planet aligns with the Klingons.
8-11: The planet remains neutral.
12-15: The planet aligns with the Federation.
16-20+: The planet joins the Federation.


...and similarly for the other tracks. So "success" is a very relative idea. The disconnect comes with the Starfleet response to your VP total (assuming you complete the mission, so no track is in the red, the Enterprise doesn't blow up, and time doesn't run out). Here's Starfleet's deal:

0 - 19 Points: Mission Complete! You are congratulated and sent on your next mission.
20 - 29 Points: Well done! A record of commendation is put in your permanent file .
30 - 39 Points: You are the proud recipient of the Prenatares Ribbon of Commendation.
40 or more points: An Admiral is dispatched to award you the Starfleet Silver Palm.
All three Mission Tracking Boards end in the top tier (16 or higher): You return to Starfleet to receive The Starfleet Medal of Honor and ensure the mission is forever recorded for Starfleet cadets to review in their studies.


They should have made this scale the same way, where the lower totals (0-19, etc.) are just shy of worst-case (e.g., "You are commended for barely staving off complete disaster, but are forced to return to Starfleet Academy for remedial studies", or something along those lines). It's like someone wrote the Starfleet response section without reading the mission tracking board text.
4 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Edited Tue Jun 7, 2011 4:53 pm
  • Posted Tue Jun 7, 2011 4:52 pm
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
Chris J Davis
United Kingdom

Overtext pending moderation...
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
It sounds like 24 points should really be the minimum required to "win".
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Posted Tue Jun 7, 2011 5:36 pm
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
Jon W
United States
Aurora
Colorado
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
bleached_lizard wrote:
It sounds like 24 points should really be the minimum required to "win".

It also depends on the difficulty level. My assumption is that the OP played on easy, since it was a demo game. Perhaps on hard, eking out anything other than a complete disaster is its own reward. Kobayashi Maru and all that.

But then, you could just change the flavor text from Starfleet if the thematic connections are too loose for your liking.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Posted Tue Jun 7, 2011 6:10 pm
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
Chris J Davis
United Kingdom

Overtext pending moderation...
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
waddball wrote:
bleached_lizard wrote:
It sounds like 24 points should really be the minimum required to "win".

It also depends on the difficulty level. My assumption is that the OP played on easy, since it was a demo game. Perhaps on hard, eking out anything other than a complete disaster is its own reward. Kobayashi Maru and all that.

But then, you could just change the flavor text from Starfleet if the thematic connections are too loose for your liking.


It still seems like a bit of a non-achievement if the mission markers start on zero and all you need to do in order to win is make sure they don't drop below zero.

I feel some house rules coming on.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Posted Tue Jun 7, 2011 6:17 pm
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
Jon W
United States
Aurora
Colorado
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
bleached_lizard wrote:
I feel some house rules coming on.

What? You? House rules?

 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Posted Tue Jun 7, 2011 6:19 pm
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
Chris J Davis
United Kingdom

Overtext pending moderation...
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
waddball wrote:
bleached_lizard wrote:
I feel some house rules coming on.

What? You? House rules?



I know, right! laugh
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Posted Tue Jun 7, 2011 6:24 pm
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
E D
United States
wilton
New York
mbmbmbmbmb
i am puzzled by all the references to expansions. seems like a lot of wishful thinking on people's parts. i'm still buying the game so i hope so. also is uhuru figure as ugly as the early pics?
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Posted Wed Jun 8, 2011 12:33 am
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
A. B. West
United States
Beech Grove
Indiana
designer
publisher
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Thank you very much for posting your impressions. I think I'd still like to give this a go. Even though you didn't enjoy it that much, you did a fine job explaining it!
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Posted Wed Jun 8, 2011 4:16 am
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
Steve Berger
United Kingdom
Borough Green
Kent
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Just to clarify a few issues, and to put some of this into context, I am a co-op fan. I own all the co-ops I reference in the blog, and find them all enjoyable, although to differing degrees. I’ve previously owned Red November, and didn’t enjoy it, so traded it, and I also own Death Angel, which I don’t particularly enjoy, so please take this into consideration. If I owned ST:E and had spent my money on it, then I’d probably be looking really hard for the good in it, but I’m so glad I didn’t buy it.

I think Lord Of The Rings is a good co-op game. At the time of it’s release, it was one of only a few games of that type, and it was the first co-op I purchased when I was getting back into gaming. It is challenging, and feels quite tense, especially towards the end of the game. Looking back at it now, and in the light of more recent releases, it does look a little dated, but I will still play it occasionally.

We were told on the stand that this was the finished game, and that it would have been for sale if it hadn’t got held up in customs on it’s way from China. There was a large sign stating that this is due to retail in the UK for £40.

As for theme, well we were at an expo, and there was an awful lot going on around us. I had the Daleks almost within arm’s reach, and Doctor Who’s water pistol did manage to spray me once during the game. Maybe being in a quieter area would have allowed us to get into it a little more, and with less distraction.

We played the game on the medium setting, having been warned by the guy showing it to us that the easy level was really very easy.

We were told we could change the order – each player had a turn, but it didn’t matter in which order. I can see from the rulebook that this is wrong now, but I don’t think it has given me a false impression of the game, or distorted it enough to have taken something away. I’d argue it made the experience slightly better because we had to decide in what order we played, and sometimes used the benefit of making someone go last to have them deliberately able to go first in the next round. Playing clockwise would have taken away this element, would have made our game slightly quicker than it was (about an hour at a guess), and would have made it quieter than it was. This was really the only piece of decision making we had to do – what you do on your turn is obvious.

Having house rules for a game which are introduced after a while is one thing. Having to house rule a game directly you take it out of the box is simply wrong, and shows that it hasn’t been playtested properly. When we were told we would get a final result, I was expecting to be demoted at the very least – we had failed, and left the planet in a mess, despite completing all the missions. The Enterprise had taken a real beating, although most players were near full health. Then we were told – well done, you got a commendation. Huh?

I stand by the original post though – this game really isn’t as good as it could, and should have been. It felt to me a little like a kid’s game. I wouldn’t mind knowing how much of this was designed by Knizia, and how much of it was finished by the publishers. I’d like to see a proper final scoring mechanism, and Knizia often does these very well. Maybe take the lowest score, and add it to an average of the two higher scores, with this reflecting your success level. This would allow for your weakest performance to make up 50% of your final assessment. A positive return should only come from scores under this method of 16 or higher. I think we had two 7’s and a 6 after adjusting for Enterprise. This would have therefore scored us 13, and should have got the result ‘return to Starfleet in disgrace for retraining’.

I didn’t notice any of the figures looking particularly ugly – I thought the miniatures were excellent, although I’m used to everything being depicted by little wooden cubes.

To repeat myself, I really didn’t find much in the way of theme or tension in this game. With the projected price tag, I know how I’d feel if I’d purchased this, and I’m really glad I had the chance to try before committing to buy.
10 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Posted Wed Jun 8, 2011 10:15 am
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
Roy Stephens
United States
San Jose
California
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Steve Be wrote:
I’m used to everything being depicted by little wooden cubes.



I think we've found the root of your problem. laugh


In all fairness, I would be interested in hearing a follow up review from you now that the game has been officially released and you have a chance to play following the rules correctly.

1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Posted Thu Jul 28, 2011 3:16 pm
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
Steve Berger
United Kingdom
Borough Green
Kent
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb

[/q]

In all fairness, I would be interested in hearing a follow up review from you now that the game has been officially released and you have a chance to play following the rules correctly.

[/q]

Well, after playing the demo at the expo, we had no intention of buying this, and although I might play it again at a real push, the experience that three of us from my local gaming group had with this was enough to put the rest of the group off buying it.

I would be keen to hear from anybody who now owns this and plays it regularly to hear some further thoughts. Looking over the forums, it looks like the game is getting a bit of a drubbing, despite the high ratings it seems to be picking up. Please tell me what I am missing.

My main issue is that I don't want people new to gaming to pick this up, and think it is representative of the hobby.

The rule errors we made were not significant enough to have the impact that would be needed to give replayability.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Posted Thu Jul 28, 2011 9:38 pm
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
Trey Stone
United States
Texarkana
Texas
mbmbmbmbmb
Steve Be wrote:


In all fairness, I would be interested in hearing a follow up review from you now that the game has been officially released and you have a chance to play following the rules correctly.



I agree with this review. I think it works better as a solo than a coop, but even then, it has limited replay value. 6 as a coop, 7 as a solo, but it is largely a mediocre disappointment.

But those minis, especially the ships, are really sweet.
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Posted Wed Oct 5, 2011 6:37 pm
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote

Subscribe

Categories

Contributors

Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.