The Hotness
Games|People|Company
Dominion: Dark Ages
Total War
Mage Knight: Board Game
Fantastiqa
Libertalia
The Lord of the Rings: Nazgul
Descent: Journeys in the Dark (Second Edition)
Eclipse
Mice and Mystics
Doctor Who: The Card Game
Lords of Waterdeep
Star Wars: X-Wing Miniatures Game
Agricola: All Creatures Big and Small
Dungeon Fighter
Android: Netrunner
Virgin Queen
A Game of Thrones: The Board Game (Second Edition)
Glory to Rome
Infiltration
Collapsible D: The Final Minutes of the Titanic
Dominion
The Lord of the Rings: The Card Game
Twilight Struggle
City of Horror
Snowdonia
1989: Dawn of Freedom
Goa
Sherlock Holmes Consulting Detective
Agricola
Among the Stars
7 Wonders: Cities
7 Wonders
The Swarm
Through the Ages: A Story of Civilization
Arkham Horror
Village
Ora et Labora
Battles of Westeros: House Baratheon Army Expansion
Race for the Galaxy
War of the Ring
Trajan
Kingdom Builder
The Castles of Burgundy
Zombicide
Twilight Imperium (third edition)
Space Alert
Dungeon Command: Sting of Lolth
Hacienda
Battlestar Galactica
Ground Floor

Loofish Ramblings

My thoughts and ponderings on games and gaming, including lunch time sessions, couple and family gaming and thoughts on the games that are catching my eye.
Recommend
6 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up

Working Lunch: Life is Uncertain, Through the Desert First

Who's the more foolish? The fool or fool that plays after the fool?
United States
DURHAM
North Carolina
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Last lunch game before our vacation and back to 5 with Tom and Mike returned. I pull out Through the Desert.

Initial maneuvers concentrate on 3 point water holes and oases. I made some moves to claim territory more than worrying about oases, Tom also moved to do that. J, Rick and Mike moved on oases mainly.

The crux of the game was my vanilla camels. My vanilla driver was relatively on his own, away from all oases and so began to stake a claim to quite a wide area. There was debate about what should be done, especially by Rick who had no caravans nearby. But neither J nor Mike chose to move on my claim, looking to do their own thing. However, Mike did do quite a lot of vanilla camel moves himself, cutting me off from my nearest oasis and accelerating the end game. All those "I'll do them later" moves were suddenly without time to do them. I enclosed a large area (14 hexes) and claimed the majority of the vanilla camels by 1 over Mike to trigger game end. But the quicker end (done in 40 minutes) with many camels left in all the other colors meant my move on the win was short: Rick claimed no enclosed territory at all, but had 4 oases, a pile of 2s and 3s from water holes and 2 colors. I did at least stay ahead of Tom by a point for a respectable 2nd.

Rick: 55
Me: 49
J: 43
Tom: 48
Mike: 35

I've noted it before, but Through the Desert with 5 players is quite harsh. The end of the game always comes quicker than you expect. You need to prioritize well, not waste moves and keep an eye on what others are doing (and how it will impact you). But you can't control everything - the run on vanilla here being a case in point. I looked to claim my area - however much they'd let me get away with - then finish up some other stuff, including some oases that I was close to without any worry that anyone else would close me off. Those are deadly - I didn't finish either of them. When one color goes fast like that, the 10 point color bonuses can be hard-fought (vanilla was 11-10) or incredibly cheap - Tom gained the blue bonus for a mere 5 camels!

So as a lunch game it works very well. 40 minutes was quick for the game, but it almost can't run over an hour without severe AP. It is strange the feeling of playing it though, your turn can be over in what seems like a blink but everyone else takes too long. As plans begin to form, the anxiety and desire for your next turn increases.

Despite that, it seems like a game that is rarely requested. Perhaps with less it might appeal more, as it does feel very constrained with all 5 in the game. But the number of good games for 4 is large - a tough competition, where the game we couldn't play because it didn't support 5 gets the nod when they are only 4 of us.
Twitter Facebook
3 Comments
Subscribe sub options Wed Jul 6, 2011 11:13 pm
Post Comment
Anthony Boydell
United Kingdom
Unspecified
Unspecified
designer
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
i'm finding one particular game night ends up with 6 of us...thats REALLY bloody awkward! Powergrid, 7Ws and Battlestar G get quite a rotation.

thinking of arranging an accident to widen our choice a little...
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Posted Thu Jul 7, 2011 12:17 am
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
Geoffrey Ulman
United States
Herndon
Virginia
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb

Just need to not be afraid to split up into 3 and 3 or 4 and 2!
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Posted Fri Jul 8, 2011 7:09 pm
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
Who's the more foolish? The fool or fool that plays after the fool?
United States
DURHAM
North Carolina
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
ulmangt wrote:

Just need to not be afraid to split up into 3 and 3 or 4 and 2!

A good option but depends on whether the motive to get together is to play a good game or to hang out together.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Posted Fri Jul 8, 2011 8:05 pm
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.