The Hotness
Games|People|Company
Dominion: Dark Ages
Total War
Mage Knight: Board Game
Fantastiqa
Libertalia
The Lord of the Rings: Nazgul
Descent: Journeys in the Dark (Second Edition)
Eclipse
Mice and Mystics
Doctor Who: The Card Game
Lords of Waterdeep
Star Wars: X-Wing Miniatures Game
Agricola: All Creatures Big and Small
Dungeon Fighter
Android: Netrunner
Virgin Queen
A Game of Thrones: The Board Game (Second Edition)
Glory to Rome
Infiltration
Collapsible D: The Final Minutes of the Titanic
Dominion
The Lord of the Rings: The Card Game
Twilight Struggle
City of Horror
Snowdonia
1989: Dawn of Freedom
Goa
Sherlock Holmes Consulting Detective
Agricola
Among the Stars
7 Wonders: Cities
7 Wonders
The Swarm
Through the Ages: A Story of Civilization
Arkham Horror
Village
Ora et Labora
Battles of Westeros: House Baratheon Army Expansion
Race for the Galaxy
War of the Ring
Trajan
Kingdom Builder
The Castles of Burgundy
Zombicide
Twilight Imperium (third edition)
Space Alert
Dungeon Command: Sting of Lolth
Hacienda
Battlestar Galactica
Ground Floor

Dux Blogorum

Notes on game development of Osprey's Dux Bellorum, and random wittering about other stuff...
Recommend
4 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up

Dux Bellorum: Creating units and sorting out bases

Dan M
United Kingdom
Worthing
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
A couple of people have asked about the numbers of figures needed for units in Dux Bellorum, and also about base sizes. Nice to know that a few people are starting to think about building armies!

Well, this is a bit of a tricky one to answer, because although I’ve given suggested unit and base sizes in the rules, you can play the game using whatever sizes you fancy. Unlike Glutter of Ravens: Warfare in the Age of Arthur, which was scaled very much like a De Bellis Antiquitatis game with one 40mm base for 15mm figures or 60mm base for 28mm figures equalling one unit, this time I’ve wanted to allow players to choose the look of their battle. I’m also aware that not only does this come down to personal preference for the look of a game, but also the amount of money and time you can invest in collecting miniatures, and the size of table you have access to (I’m in a small apartment, so the later is my big problem); this means that I want to ensure you can have an equally good game regardless of how much space you have to play on ... the mechanics of the game slide up or down based around units, regardless of their composition.

How does this work? Well, there’s no set ground scale in the game (that seems out of kilter firstly with the nature of Dark Ages warfare, but also beyond the game-weighted, as opposed to simulation-weighted, rules I’m producing), and all measurements are given in Base Widths. I like this mechanism a lot, and first remember seeing it in a set of horse & musket rules in Wargames Illustrated, probably in the late 1980s or early 1990s. Whoever came up with the idea, thanks, because it allows a game to be scaled up or down as the player wishes. So measurements in the game are entirely dependent on the base sizes you choose for your units. Admittedly, if you go for figures based on a 120mm base, it will look great but you’ll need a big table and long arms to push the units around in the middle of it! A Foot unit usually moves 2BW and a Mounted unit 4BW, so using 40mm (DBA-style) bases as individual units, Foot units move 8cm per move and Mounted 16cm per move - perfectly fine on a 2x2ft table; scale that up to 80mm bases (either using 28mm figures or several 40mm bases pushed together as one unit), and Foot move 16cm and Mounted move 32cm. Again, manageable, but probably on a 6x4ft table minimum.

Anyway, to (finally!) answer the question about how many figures you’ll need and how to base them, let’s take a look at the options. In the rulebook, I’ve assumed that you’ll use one 40mm or 60mm wide base per unit. Shieldwall and some Warriors are 4 figures to a base; most Warriors and all Riders are 3 to a base; all Skirmishers (Foot and Mounted) are 2 to a base. But the options really are endless.

You might go for a DBA, Field of Glory or Wargames Research Group base as your core unit size, which means 3 or 4 Foot or 2 or 3 Mounted on a base 40mm wide from 15mm figures and 60mm wide for 28mm figures. That’s easy enough to collect and paint. Or you could scale up a bit: using either 15mm or 28mm figures on 80mm wide bases - that could be 8 15mm Foot or maybe 4 28mm Foot on a narrow depth base, or if you double the base depths, 16 15mm Foot or 8 28mm Foot. Base depth, by the way, doesn’t matter in the rules at all, unless you tried to go for something ridiculously deep; so it’s fine if you want two ranks of figures rather than one, for example.

Single-based figures can be used in clumps or on movement trays (as used in Warhammer Ancient Battles and War of the Ring for example); the rules provide some guidance on this, but as a rough guide I’d say one unit might have 8 Foot or 4 Mounted to look good.

Army sizes are usually between 5 and 12 units, to give you some idea of how many units you need. Once again, the player has flexibility depending on what sort of army he or she wants to command - a small, elite force or a larger muster of average troops.

Flexibility. That’s what I’m going for in DB. That does mean that you need to work out what base sizes suit you, and I’d still recommend working with the traditional WRG bases (either as individual units or pushing several together as one unit). Alongside scalability, I wanted to avoid players needing to do one thing: rebasing. No-one likes doing that!
Twitter Facebook
5 Comments
Subscribe sub options Thu Jul 7, 2011 12:45 pm
Post Comment
Bob Barnetson
Canada
Edmonton
Alberta
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
I think this is a very smart design decision--scaling off base widths and not sweating base depths. Maximizes those who can play the game, eliminates rebasing. Very cagey. And BWs are much more flexible than inches, centimetres or some sort of generic paces.

1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Posted Sat Jul 9, 2011 2:25 am
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
Dan M
United Kingdom
Worthing
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Hi Bob, that's right - I've never understood why base widths hasn't become more common as a measurement in minis games. I've always assumed that gamers just prefer something more tangible in inches or centimetres. At some point I'll trawl back through my old mags to find out where I first saw it being used...
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Posted Sat Jul 9, 2011 8:11 am
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
CD Ireland
Scotland

mbmbmb
We've used both individual 40mm bases as units and also two such bases sabot or four such bases sabot. This is in 15mm. I don'tthink base frontages above 100mm are very practical except on overly large tables.

CD
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Posted Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:49 pm
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
peter hall


msg tools
I have used Glutter as my main rukeset for a few years now and have very easily moved it forward to WORs and 100years war(french cavalry at Poitiers have every chance of moving through crossbows). I got so frustrated by artificial ground scales I played GOR in 6mm and to 1-1 scale(both figures and groundscale)

Eventually, we noted that games did become reliant on the morale of the troops and cavalry could become a battle winning arm if used correctly.
By leaving the 40mm frontage, I based by warbands/retinues on circular bases(60mm GW rounds) and without the artificial measuremnet of base edges, the game flowed very well.
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Posted Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:17 pm
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote
Dan M
United Kingdom
Worthing
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
1-1 on 60mm bases must look pretty impressive. I keep trying to summon up the courage to step down to 6mm from 15mm as the Baccus minis are very enticing. For your medievals are you using Heroics & Ros, Irregular or Baccus?

I can't really see any problem using round bases for Dux Bellorum as I've tried to keep everything as simple as possible, especially with basing. The days of ground scales and minutes per turn are far behind me, which probably appeals to some gamers and makes others shudder...
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
  • Posted Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:45 pm
    • Choose your Dice
      • Roll
      • Comment (Optional)
    • Reply
    •  
    • Quote

Subscribe

Categories

Contributors

Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.