list | lg gallery | sm gallery
Search
Filters »    Columns »    Views »   
User: drasher25: Board Game Collection
Download board games: (all | owned) |    | Current Filters: rating=7 [X]
1 to 174 of 174   Page 1. 1
Title Version User
Rating
Geek Rating Status User
Plays
Comment
7
Apr 2014
5.598
Plays: 1
7
Mar 2014
N/A
Owned
Plays: 1
Alderac Entertainment English Version
Year: 2008
7
Apr 2013
5.937
Prev. Owned
Plays: 3
English first edition
Year: 2009
7
Sep 2014
6.434
Owned
Prev. Owned
Plays: 3
This feels like a more polished version of a game I would have designed in 7th grade. Theme is great, components are great, and the general theme of risk/reward and push your luck is well implemented. However, the game also feels disjointed because every section has its own rules. While there are decision points along the way, which way you go has more to do with what you feel like exploring rather than any strategic imperative.

I get what this game is trying to accomplish by providing a theme-rich sense of adventure. However, in the push-you-luck genre, I derive more excitement and sense of agency from less theme-intense but more mechanically focused games, such as Diamant, Exscape, or Can't Stop.
2014-09-23
7
Jan 2015
5.544
Owned
Plays: 6
This game is simple and fun. It is a roll-and-move game with some features to help you land on the spaces you are targeting. There's some educational and inspirational value here, with spaces called "Imaginiation," "Credability," "Flexibility," and "Experience." The game earns a bonus point for effective use of metaphor.

I also like that they used familiar brands and companies rather than made-up ones.
2015-01-17
Rio Grande English edition
Year: 2007
7
Aug 2013
6.680
Prev. Owned
Plays: 3
This is a really nice design. I especially like how there are truly varied paths to victory. You can win without getting a single "Court" card. Such upgrades are essential for victory in most other games of this type, but here they are just tools, and that is very interesting.

Maybe slightly redundant to other games in my collection though?
2013-08-17
Arboretum (2015)
7
Aug 2015
6.402
Prev. Owned
Plays: 1
Surprisingly tense for a game about creating the most sumptuous arboretum. It feels very Lost Cities-ish, but with less tension around which card to play and more around which to discard. Is a good game, but does not replace Lost Cities or Battle Line for 2 player play, and I think I enjoy Keltis: Das Orakel more for 3-4.

I think there is some disconnect between the ostensibly harmonious theme and the prominent denial mechanisms. Blocking the crap out of your opponent' scoring feels kinda mean in a game about beautiful trees. "Who's the most sumptuous NOW, beatch?!?"

On the other hand, this game enables abnormally frequent use of the word "sumptuous"
2015-08-19
Z-Man Games First Edition
Year: 2009
7
Sep 2011
6.442
Owned
Plays: 6
Feels like multiplayer Lost Cities with Bohnanza scoring. I like it as a quick filler, but it isn't quite as good as either of those two games.

2009-12-10
Arena Maximus (2003)
7
Jan 2007*
5.741
Owned
Plays: 1
Great mechanic to balance speed with manuverabilty and ability to fight. I haven't yet decided if the other aspects of the game are too cumbersome for a "race" game. They may be for new players, but I suspect not once experience is gained.
2007-01-20*
Asmodee English Edition
Year: 2006
7
Apr 2015
6.439
Prev. Owned
Plays: 5
New Asmodee edition. The track spaces are incredibly irregular, with some being too small to hold the chariots! The board looks great through, so we found this to be more funny than annoying.
The game is very simple, but we were surprised how much fun it was. Bring on the track expansions, Asmodee!
2007-01-11*
Milton Bradley Third Edition
Year: 1987
7
Mar 2009*
6.341
Prev. Owned
English first edition
Year: 2000
7
Apr 2015
6.474
Prev. Owned
Plays: 4
This is a neat game with some clever mechanics. Despite the game's destructive nature, someone gets to victory before the game gets drawn out for too long.

However, I think this games gets Jones Ruled out by Omen.
2015-04-23
Mayfair Games Edition
Year: 2008
7
Jul 2009*
5.720
Prev. Owned
Plays: 1
I don't think this is really all that much like Bang. The core mechanism here is that you take 3 cards, keep 1, discard 1, and gift 1, and a solid little game was built around it. Players need to be very aware of the cards they pick and pass out, as victory depends on not handing someone else the win as much as getting yourself to your goals. I need to play this one some more to see how much better it can get with familiarity. it is a solid design, and I suspect one of those games that is best when you play a few times in a row - the game length (20 min) supports that nicely. There is some fiddliness in the rules about when and how you can play privilege cards that I think should have been streamlined somehow.
2009-07-30
Baker's Dozen (2008)
Playroom Entertainment edition 2008
Year: 2008
7
Mar 2010
6.279
Owned
For Trade
Plays: 5
I've been considering this one for a while. When the new Baker's Dozen version came out, I finally jumped on it. I've got plenty of games about witches and potions, but not nearly enough about food!

I think I like the variant where you deal out all the cards right at the beginning.

UPDATE AFTER SOME PLAYS: I feels a lot like a cross between Category 5 and Coloretto. It may be slightly easier to explain that those (admittedly already pretty easy) games, but I think that overall I would rather play one of those than this. However, the people I've played it with seemed to really like it. My kids especially enjoy it.
2014-11-05
7
Dec 2014
6.886
Owned
Plays: 4
Bang! Express. Doesn't replace the card game for me, but it does fit better with a casual game crowd with limited time/attention span. The arrow mechanism is particularly clever and keep the game brief.
2013-11-05
Klaus Teuber's Classics Edition
Year: 2005
7
Nov 2013
6.083
Owned
Plays: 2
First Edition
Year: 2006
7
Dec 2013
7.239
Prev. Owned
Plays: 5
So far, it's pretty good. One thing I'm not crazy about is the victory condition. I tend to try to set up my lines for the long haul or as a force that can break through the enemy lines. That has led to many a defeat as my opponent plays the correct strategy of isolating weakened units so she can finish them off!

UPDATE Dec 2013:
I think I overexpanded this game. Dealing with the new units is really clunky, and the color based system is so bastardized that it became more of a hindrance than a hep in figuring out what the units do. I went as far as helping Universal Head bring his BL player aid up to date just so I had a chance at keeping the units straight, but it was still a hassle. When BL 2nd Edition came out, I realized that was closer to what i wanted to get out of this game, so BL1 was sold.
2013-12-03
7
Apr 2011
7.704
Prev. Owned
Want To Play
Plays: 4
DEAL-BREAKER: Gameplay seems too plodding. A bit too many mechanisms, each of them rather uninteresting on their own.

I like my for my co-op games to not exceed a certain rules complexity. This is so that the game can thrive on the player "social" interaction rather than worrying about parsing the rules. I think that Lord of the Rings and Pandemic both get the rules depth about right. I think that both Shadows Over Camelot, and to a greater extent, BSG, start to really push up against the rules complexity that I'm comfortable with for this type of game. However, that being said, I think that BSG is still on the proper side of the line, and all the game's systems serve the goal of giving the players some interesting things to base their actions around.

So far, I've played twice, both times with the same 4 players, and both times the Cylon gave herself away very early, which I think severely hampered the game. Also, I'm not a fan on the Sympathizer rules, which are both too fiddly and not much fun for the person who draws that card. I think next time I'll try to find more players or try the "no sympathizer" variant.

I am eager to try this again, and I want to be a Cylon!

UPDATE:
Okay,I got my wish and got to be a Cylon. This happened a little past the halfway point when the revealed Cylon pushed his other card to me. Despite that, I was able to avoid being pegged as toaster until the turn I revealed during the run to the last jump.

I think the game does a great job of setting the atmosphere and creating tension, but I find the gameplay to be too ponderous. I think I'm changing my opinion that this game was on the good side of the complexity line. It's actually not so much the complexity as the plodding pace it had for us as we went though every step, shuffle, and math at each turn. I had assumed that the game would smooth out a bit with more play, but it hasn't. After tonight's game, I don't know that I would choose to play this again over something else. Just too long.

I also am terrible at remembering to use the characters' negative abilities.

I think maybe Shadows Over Camelot has the better approach. Overall, Shadows is certainly less thematic, but it still gives a good measure of the hidden traitor vibe, and more importantly the mechanisms are simple enough that they get out of the way of enjoyment of that aspect.

I can see why some people love this game, but for the life of me I can't imagine wanting to add more baggage to it with the expansions.

Overall, I would be very happy to play someone else's copy of this, but I don't see myself teaching and leading a group through it again.
2011-04-04
English first edition
Year: 2005
7
Jan 2015
6.190
Prev. Owned
Plays: 3
I think the people who have described this game as a combination of Taj Mahal and Lord of the Rings are dead on. The game shares the brinksmanship bidding of Taj Mahal and the set storyline and events of Lord of the Rings. The game feels lighter than either of its parents, and it is a good game in its own right. My primary criticism of the game is the tiny board spaces. The pieces don't even fit in them, and they are very hard to read from across the board. The spaces should have been twice as big, and there is plenty of empty space on the board for them to have done so. Yes, the background art is nice, but I'd much rather have had bigger spaces.
2015-01-05
Second Edition with Replacement Tiles
Year: 2010
7
Nov 2014
6.944
Owned
Plays: 5
I like this style of gameplay on occassion, and I think this game tried hard to implement a lot of neat ideas. The theme is great, and I like the dice system. Thankfully, the second edition of the game fixed the shamefully poorly edited rulebooks.

UPDATE Nov 2014: This is generally a fun experience, but it is highly variable how good of a GAME you are actually going to have.
2014-11-11
Blokus (2000)
7
Mar 2009*
6.898
Owned
Plays: 5
Bonkers! (1978)
Parker Brothers edition
Year: 1978
7
Jul 2013
5.520
Owned
Plays: 2
Boochie (2008)
7
Apr 2013
5.596
Owned
Plays: 9
English first edition
Year: 2013
7
Mar 2014
7.279
Prev. Owned
Plays: 2
BSG Express (2011)
Print-and-play edition
Year: 2011
7
Dec 2012
6.228
Prev. Owned
Plays: 1
Ca$h 'n Gun$ (2005)
7
Sep 2007*
6.595
Owned
Plays: 1
I need to get this played with a rowdy group and see how it goes.
2007-09-12*
English edition
Year: 1999
7
Aug 2004*
6.287
Prev. Owned
Plays: 1
This is kind of an odd one, but I do enjoy it. I like the choice to either play two cards openly or one hidden.
2004-08-30*
English first edition
Year: 2013
7
Feb 2014
6.575
Prev. Owned
Plays: 2
This is decent alternate Carcassonne. I do like that it includes a Cloister type tile, which is somthing my current Carc faves (Hunters & Gatherers and Castle) do not.
The tiles look great, and collection of the resources as wooden bits is a nice change. I especially like the fishing mechanism where the seas become depleted.

However, overall, I don't enjoy it quite as much as H&G. The filling of ship orders was not an interesting as I had hoped, and more or less just felt like an extra step to get your score.
2014-03-13
English first edition
Year: 2004
7
Oct 2013
6.916
Prev. Owned
Plays: 1
The wall building adds a lot to the game. I just wish they had used a Hunters & Gatherers or The Castle-like mechanism for scoring the fields!
2013-08-18
Parker Brothers edition 1976
Year: 1976
7
Feb 2013
5.641
Owned
Plays: 2
English first edition
Year: 2011
6.5
Sep 2014
6.978
Prev. Owned
Plays: 3
English revised edition 2005
Year: 2005
7
Jul 2009*
6.680
Prev. Owned
Plays: 7
This is a very good game that I enjoy even more that the Settlers board game. It's great when you're looking for a two-player contest that's somewhat deeper and longer than the typical Kosmos game. The drawback is that I don't find this to be the most exciting game and it tends to feel just a little long.
2009-09-17
Revised edition
Year: 2006
7
Mar 2013
6.649
Prev. Owned
Makes a good game a bit better. Adding a new focus with each small expansion is a great way to add some interest.
2009-09-18
7
Nov 2013
5.596
Prev. Owned
Plays: 3
More exciting and interactive than the regular rules.
2009-08-21
English second edition
Year: 2008
7
Dec 2014
6.973
Prev. Owned
Plays: 1
This is a very fun negotiation game. The only reason I don't own it is another game called Lords of Vegas. The games have a very similar feel to me, but LoV replaces the calculations of Chinatown with the evaluation of probabilities, and I enjoy the latter more.
2014-12-17
7
Nov 2010
6.247
Plays: 1
City of Iron (2013)
7
Apr 2014
6.659
Plays: 1
TSR English First Edition
Year: 1992
7
Oct 2011
5.614
Owned
Plays: 2
A nice improvement on the original, which was one of my childhood favorites. The bigger board, minis, and ability to keep the cards on the board are very nice. I also like that you can find your "to-hit" number by color rather than having to read the card - better suited for my young kids.
The art also got a nice upgrade in this version.
2011-10-14
Colosseum (2007)
7
Aug 2015
6.995
Prev. Owned
Plays: 2
Not sure I would enjoy the trading or some of the random elements thrown in here, not to mention the forced-catch up mechanism of last place player taking a resource from first place. Seems like a family-friendisized Princes of Florence.

UPDATE: I bought it and played it a few times with my family, after trading Princes of Florence for being too dry. This game certainly has more flavor, but is overall an even more milquetoast gaming experience. The auction, ostensibly the central mechanism of the game, is frequently uncontested. There is also potential for AP as people study the program card.

That all being said, this is a very beautifully produced, pleasant family game, and I'll happily play it. The catch-up mechanism actually works pretty well in the context of the game. The limited actions possible between auctions keeps everything nicely under control. However, it does make the gamer in me crave Medici for a truly great auction, and good ol Catan is a better trading game.
2015-08-18
Core Worlds (2011)
7
Jan 2014
6.952
Plays: 1
7
Aug 2013
5.678
Owned
My 2 year old daughter loves this game, and I love playing it with her. I was amazed the way she instantly recognized one door could stand for its color, picture, count, and a letter. I highly recommend this for 2-5 year olds.

2008-01-31*
7
Feb 2011
5.921
Owned
Dancing Dice (2004)
7
Apr 2008*
5.571
Prev. Owned
Plays: 3
Painless dice-rolling fun
2008-04-20*
Dark Minions (2011)
7
Jul 2012
5.728
Plays: 1
Playroom Edition
Year: 2004
7
Sep 2013
6.131
Prev. Owned
Plays: 10
D&G is a trick taking game that has 2 features I really like. One, there's no trump. I like that because I always mess up trump. Two, high cards, low cards, and middle cards are all useful due to the very clever scoring system. Very fun, although a full game (one round for each player) would be too long. Fortunately, you can just play a round or two.
2007-01-24*
7
Jul 2013
7.618
Prev. Owned
Plays: 1
I believe that DOOM is the best iteration of this system. DOOM gets you to the good stuff (tactical combat, special abilities, fun dice resolution system) with the least amount of hassle. The hook of Descent 2 for me is the campaign system. In concept, it is cool that the heroes and the overlord can level up. However, the two sides are leveling up more or less equally, so the "leveling up" really just means that everyone rolls more dice and can take more damage. It is not like the leveling up in say, Runebound, where you have to judge when you are powerful enough to take on greater challenges. In D2, you do a series of missions at level 1, then a series at level 2, which is similar except everyone rolls twice as many dice. This is underwhelming to me. However, I do like how the outcome of each encounter affects how following ones unfold. The campaign is suitably epic, but it is a commitment of quite a few game nights.

Personally, I'd prefer to just get in and out with DOOM for the combat, play Mansions of Madness for the narrative, or Earth Reborn for a more intricate tactical experience. D2 falls through these cracks for me, and is therefore getting Jones ruled off my shelves. I would still very happily play D2 anytime, though.

2013-07-07
7
Nov 2013
6.943
Plays: 1
There is some good stuff here, but I fear that the impact of the random events is too great in relation to the amount of strategy present in the rest of the game. Imagine if you pieces in a territory could be randomly wiped out in a game of "China" and you'll get my drift. Maybe this game is light from a Wallace point of view, but it's not so light that I don't get annoyed when my board position is destroyed by a random card draw.
2012-09-11
Domaine (2003)
7
May 2006*
6.792
Owned
Plays: 1
This is one that seems to really annoy women because points can be taken away! I like the way the card deck limits actions a bit and puts a time limit on the game. I find keeping track of the score and mine income a bit of a chore. Overall, I think it's a neat game, but I'm not sure that I find it a lot of fun. While I like it, but I think I'm more likely to reach for Elasund when I'm in mood for this type of game. However, I also feel compelled to try it again, so my opinion may improve.
2006-05-03*
Dragon Delta (2000)
English first edition
Year: 2000
7
Oct 2010
6.210
Prev. Owned
Plays: 3
Excellent condition.
2010-11-16
7
Aug 2004*
5.948
Owned
Plays: 1
A slick little expandable hack-fest. Each player acts as dungeon master for the other players. The scope is limited, but that's part of the appeal. Good for a play every once in a while or when you don't want to lug along your Runequest or Talisman sets.
2004-08-24*
7
Sep 2010
6.006
Owned
Plays: 1
Slightly better balance in this set with the addition of "pumpable" monsters. I don't really feel I need any more expansions beyond this one, though.
2005-05-12*
DungeonQuest (1985)
7
Oct 2011
6.373
Prev. Owned
Plays: 2
A good game, but man, the cards are unhelpful at telling you how to resolve them. A lot of referring to the rules is required at first. However, the fear this game creates is awesome. It's one of the few games where you're relieved rather than bored when a room is empty. I find the combat mechanism tedious, however. If it's going to be nearly totally random, just roll a die and be done with it.
2011-02-18
First Edition
Year: 2003
7
Nov 2012
5.498
Prev. Owned
Pretty good dungeon crawl. The twist here is that you're up against your fellow players more than the dungeon itself. The grit and saving throw systems are clever ways to balance out bad luck.
2004-08-05*
Dweebies (2010)
7
Dec 2013
5.704
Owned
Plays: 39
7
Apr 2013
5.642
Owned
Plays: 18
Perfect for when you just want to roll dice.
2008-04-20*
7
Jan 2014
6.104
Prev. Owned
Plays: 1
7
Apr 2013
5.670
Owned
Plays: 5
SPARK: Great to play with my 3 and 5 year olds. Teaches them counting (dice recognition) and memory skills, with just enough interaction to also allow them to practice good sportsmanship. The way my son shouts "DOUBLES!"

Excellent kids' game and game for parents to play with their children. My 3 year old has the rules down and loves it! This game has improved his counting skills and he can now instantly identify the number on die faces without needing to count the dots.
2011-04-03
Kickstarter Deluxe Edition
Year: 2013
7
Oct 2014
7.091
Prev. Owned
Plays: 4
This game definitely brings some novel ideas into the worker placement genre, with its unique use of dice and interesting game flow. I very much respect it for its beautiful artwork, absolutely stunning production, original theme, and novel mechanisms. However, after a few games it started to feel a bit samey, despite all the stuff going on. Also, this game is all about tempo, not blocking, which is odd for a worker placement and something that I don't find as satisfying.

I am hopeful the the expansion revitalizes this game as much as Tuscany did for Kickstarter. That may get me to take another look at it.
2015-06-07
Z-Man Games edition
Year: 2004
7
Apr 2014
6.681
Prev. Owned
Plays: 3
Very good condition.
2014-04-27
7
Dec 2009*
6.530
Prev. Owned
Plays: 5
Fun little puzzle game. The problem is, the more you think about your moves, the better you'll do, but the less fun you'll have. Implement a (short) turn timer!

I've ended up playing this a couple times around Halloween for the last couple years, and it's always been with 5+ players. Each time I am left with the impression that the game would be better with fewer, but have yet to try it that way.

2009-11-04
7
Jan 2013
6.676
Plays: 2
7
Mar 2009*
5.978
Prev. Owned
Plays: 5
Great bluffing game with a fair amount of strategy. This is one of the more giggly and cursifying games I own. The cards need sleeves though because their quality is not great, which is surprising from Days of Wonder.
2008-05-03*
Five Tribes (2014)
7
Oct 2014
7.604
Plays: 1
7
Apr 2013
7.209
Plays: 1
German edition
Year: 2008
7
Jul 2012
6.370
Owned
Plays: 14
7
Aug 2015
6.827
Owned
For Trade
Plays: 8
A great distillation of Pandemic down to a more kid and family friendly format. Great components! Not nearly as interesting to me as Pandemic, but I give it points for being easier to get to the table with casual gamers.
2011-03-10
7
Sep 2010
6.057
Prev. Owned
I eventually realized that this is not a racing game - it's really a gambling "press your luck" game. The rules variations suggested to add "realism" are laudable, but really subtract from the essence of the game. Even the strange pit stop rules make sense when viewed in the context of a gambling game. The game is good even with just 2 people, but I'd recommend each driver play 2 cars. I haven't played the full Formula De, but I really don't think I'd like it as much. Adding any more complexity or length would probably make the game too tedious for me, but I really enjoy the "mini" version.
2010-12-16
Francis Drake (2013)
7
Dec 2014
7.042
Prev. Owned
Plays: 1
Wow, amazing production quality on this game. However, I am still waiting for a great game that uses the excellent "one way worker placement road" mechanism. To be sure, Francis Drake does a much better job with it than Egezia (which I give credit for inventing this mechanism), but still doesn't fully do it justice.

I don't think the second half of the game scales well to fewer players. Even with a full boat, I'm not sure about the programmed order mechanism used for scoring in a game of this weight. I think that can work very well in a lighter game (e.g. Caribbean), but I'm not sure it is aligned with the tensely tactical worker-placement phase of the game.
2014-12-03
Friday (2011)
7
Feb 2012
7.070
Plays: 3
This is a clever game in a nice package that feels like a deck-building trainer. I don't feel like it has much replay value for me. I beat it on hard after 3 games and feel kinda done. Going for higher scores doesn't appeal to me much - I'd probably rather go back to solo Thunderstone!



2012-02-19
Parker Brothers Edition 1977
Year: 1977
7
Feb 2013
5.497
Owned
Plays: 11
7
Nov 2010
7.161
Plays: 1
Z-Man Games edition
Year: 2008
7
Jun 2012
5.622
Prev. Owned
Plays: 1
This is a good area-control game. It could have easily been presented with common military or trading theme. They did a really good job with the theme, and it fits well. The main drawback for me is that it in my collection it competes with games like Carolus Magnus, Dynasties, and Great Wall of China, and I don't like it as well as those.
2012-06-24
Ghost Stories (2008)
7
Nov 2011
7.277
Plays: 1
Ginkgopolis (2012)
7
May 2013
7.060
Plays: 1
Rio Grande Edition
Year: 2006
7
Apr 2013
5.998
Owned
Plays: 3
Gopher It! (1999)
7
Oct 2011
5.583
Owned
Plays: 8
This is a great game to play with kids. The game is a good lesson in risk taking. I play it with my 3 and 5 year old. The three year old needs just a little help, and the five year old has it down. They both really like this game, especially collecting the trophies.
2011-02-18
El Grande (1995)
7
Sep 2014
7.720
Plays: 1
This is a really nice, clean design. I will gladly play it anytime. However, I don't yet know if it earns a space on my shelf next to some of its juicier descendants such as Chaos in the Old World, Rattus, Shogun, and even Dynasties.

I think the fact that I'm not too excited by any of the expansions is a tribute to the elegance, power, and purity of the original design. I have to admit that preferring Rattus makes me feel like a candy ass.
2014-09-04
First edition
Year: 2006
7
Sep 2014
6.467
Prev. Owned
Small Box Edition
Year: 2006
7
Aug 2014
6.038
Prev. Owned
Plays: 5
Excellent packaging was used for the FFG Silver Line edition. This could have easily been marketed as Samurai: The Card game. It's become a lunchtime favorite. It's a bit of a shame that the FFG version didn't keep the iconography of the German edition.
2007-03-17*
7
Dec 2013
5.722
Owned
Plays: 4
Guillotine (1998)
7
Oct 2010
6.447
Owned
Plays: 7
Doesn't do much for me, but my lunch group likes it! I find it somewhat better with the "play as many action cards as you like on your turn" variant.
2010-01-25
First edition
Year: 2005
7
Oct 2014
6.127
Prev. Owned
Plays: 4
Excellent poker style game. This is great with a group of 3-6, but I'm not too impressed with 2 player play. Make sure to carefully explain the somewhat fiddly Dog rules - the Dog cheat sheet on the publisher's web site is helpful in this regard.

I wish I hadn't had to pay so much for this game, but if the Funagain exclusive deal was necessary to get the game published then I guess it was worth it.
2007-01-20*
Rio Grande English Edition
Year: 2002
7
Sep 2010
5.889
Owned
Plays: 6
A fun 2-player quickie! Very light, but embodies the feel of the theme very well.
2005-05-12*
German / English edition
Year: 2005
7
Apr 2013
6.379
Prev. Owned
Plays: 3
7
Jan 2013
5.430
Owned
Plays: 3
Helios (2014)
7
Sep 2015
6.250
Prev. Owned
This looks to be a very nice midweight eurogame, in the vein of Notre Dame and Yspahan. I especially like the mechanism of the sun moving round and triggering resource replenishment and scoring. However, I don't know that it would be good enough to earn shelfspace considering I already have some games I love (such as the two mentioned above) in this category. If it gets a full expansion that adds variability, I will give it another look.

UPDATE: Bought the game on sale, and the production is awesome. However, this is another one of those euros where everything you do gives you points. Feld does a lot fo these games, but he usually adds an interesting mechanism to limit the actions you can take. Helios doesn't really do this, other than encouraging you to try to build a set of 4 like color tiles. As such, you get to just sit there and try to work out which action will eeke out an extra point or two for you.
2015-08-21
7
Apr 2005*
6.030
Prev. Owned
Uberplay edition
Year: 2004
7
Feb 2011
6.392
Prev. Owned
Plays: 1
Very good condition.
2011-10-03
Multilingual first edition
Year: 2012
7
Nov 2014
6.376
Prev. Owned
Plays: 3
I think this is the best game of its ilk (vs. Metro & Tsuro). The game is absolutely gorgeous and is a good one to play with kids.
2014-11-17
English first edition (second printing)
Year: 2010
7
Feb 2015
7.136
Prev. Owned
Plays: 2
This game has a unique feel and a very unusual rhythm. It also has so many cards that seem overpowered that on balance none of them are. In this it reminds me a lot of Glory to Rome. However, Innovation is much more chaotic than GtR, and as such I think that all the interesting twists it presents would eventually begin to wear on me.
2015-02-16
Jungle Speed (1997)
7
Sep 2010
6.488
Owned
Plays: 12
7
Dec 2011
5.562
Prev. Owned
Plays: 4
Second edition with Dr. Toy winner sticker
Year: 2007
7
Jul 2015
5.869
Owned
For Trade
Plays: 4
You wouldn't know it to look at it, but this game is a knife fight in a phone booth. The design strikes me like something out of a Sid Sackson book, and that's a good thing.

Also excellent for teaching kids multiplication.

2015-01-20
Kemet (2012)
7
Apr 2013
7.480
Plays: 1
I don't generally enjoy it when turn order is so important.
2014-11-04
7
Nov 2013
7.457
Prev. Owned
Plays: 2
Knight Hawks (1983)
7
Jan 2007*
5.585
Owned
I spent my junior high years collecting Star Frontiers stuff. Never actually played that much, but back then I loved to read rules. This was a great game system that got overshadowed by 2nd Ed D&D. The Zebulon's Guide was an awesome addition and streamlined the system - unfortunately the first volume was the only one published, so they never got around to updating the Knight Hawks space combat rules.
2011-01-10
Ravensburger German Edition
Year: 2009
7
Jul 2015
6.066
Prev. Owned
Plays: 2
7
Feb 2015
7.488
Plays: 1
This game has some very nice implementation of its theme. However, the game mechanisms are not quite as interesting as some of its peers. There is also air if setup and take down burden. That makes it hard for me to choose this when I find Star Realms gameplay more interesting and streamlined. I don't know how long Aliens would hold my interest once I've played through all the scenarios. So this game is a low 7 for me, meaning I'd always be happy to play someone else's copy, but it is an easy decision for me to not buy it myself.
2015-02-17
Liar's Dice (1987)
7
Mar 2009*
6.812
Owned
Plays: 4
Great group game once you get into the spirit of it. This game is nearly pure bluffing, like dollar poker. I think rigorous interrogation of the bidder to see if they'll crack is a must.
2007-03-17*
Lifeboats (1993)
7
May 2011
6.394
Plays: 1
Good negotiation game. I would be happy to play it any time. It is very rules light, leaving more room for the negotation (in contrast, I felt that Mall of Horror had too much procedure going on that got in the way of the bargaining). However, I'm the Boss is king of the hill for me in this type of game.
2011-05-20
Loco! (2003)
Fantasy Flight Games edition
Year: 2003
7
Sep 2010
6.359
Owned
For Trade
Plays: 11
Loopin' Louie (1992)
7
Dec 2012
6.799
Plays: 1
Rio Grande English edition
Year: 2002
7
Dec 2014
5.745
Prev. Owned
Plays: 1
7
Jan 2015
N/A
Owned
Luna (2010)
7
Jun 2012
6.999
Plays: 1
I've only read the rules, but yikes, this game seems like it barely hangs together - this coming from a huge Feld fan. I would be happy to try it, but it's not a buy for me now.

UPDATE: Played it, and it was much better than I thought it would be. It is actually not nearly as obtuse s my rules reading suggested. However, it does have a few too many moving parts for my tastes.
2012-06-07
English first edition
Year: 2010
7
Jul 2012
7.225
Prev. Owned
Plays: 5
THE DEALBREAKERS: The pacing is off; the most interesting part of the game ends before the game does. By the time you finally get your engine together, it is just not that satisfying to turn the crank on it. Too much dependency on what dice rolls and cards come up for a calculating cube-pusher.

I generally appreciate this game and the way all the parts fit together. At first, I liked the challenge of trying to put together the right engine to allow the purchase of PP each turn. If you can but PP on just one turn when your opponents can't, you'll have a big advantage. I also like the trade-off between a couple cubes now or a bunch of cubes later.

However, I'm finding this less interesting with repeated plays. You need to deal with multiple levels of randomness, so you can't count on either the dice or the cards you'd like to see come up.

I think my biggest issue with the game is with its pacing. You can't do a whole lot at the beginning. Then, you do a bunch of stuff towards the middle and finally get your engine in play, but then in the last third of the game you are awash in cubes and pretty much just mopping up. That last third takes the longest to play out because you need to dink all your cards and deal with all your cubes. Consequently, the game loses some momentum at the endgame.

What is up with the thin cardboard? The tokens in this game and Notre Dame are barely acceptable. Come on guys, this is the Alea Big Box series! Step it up!

So to sum up: I found the game quite interesting at first, mainly due to the dice mechanism, but the game lost its luster for me with more plays.
2012-07-24
7
Sep 2006*
5.902
Prev. Owned
Plays: 4
A pretty good, tense game. It might have been better done with a castle and walls theme, but spaceships work as well. The one problem I can see is that there's potential for a game to drag on for a very long time, but this may be a misfounded fear, as it hasn't happened to me yet. I think the luck factor some people seem to worry about is mitigated by the fact that you can discard your whole hand for a new one every turn.
2006-09-20*
Mancala (1944)
7
Feb 2012
5.746
Plays: 22
7
Nov 2014
7.263
Plays: 2
This game is very attractive and fun to play, but the overall vibe is not compelling enough that I need to own it.
2014-11-19
Marvel Heroes (2006)
7
Mar 2009*
6.177
Plays: 2
There's a lot more strategy here than you might think, and there's enough dice rolling that things usually work out the way you'd expect, but with the occasional upset to keep you on your toes. However, I worry a bit about the balance between the teams, and it seems that a lucky card draw can really slant things in one player's favor. Also, the game is just a little too complex for it to be a gateway game, which is a little counterintuitive given the theme.

I think that Nexus may have learned the wrong lesson from the success of The War of the Ring. That game is so deep, and so reminiscent of its source material that people are willing to put up with the fiddliness of it. But when it comes to Superheroes, It's Clobberin' Time! I thin it was amistake to weigh the game down with all the niggling rules like they got away with in WotR.

I think I'd be happy to play this once in a while, but owning it, and therefore having the responsibility of teaching it, was ultimately too much of a burden for me, so I traded it.

2011-06-03
Metropolys (2008)
7
Dec 2014
6.775
Prev. Owned
This is a nice design, and is very clever. I don't find it quite as fun as it is clever, but I'd still happily play it. I think the new goals from the Extension cards are an improvement to the point where I'd almost consider them a needed "patch" for the base game.
2014-12-14
7
Dec 2014
N/A
Prev. Owned
Just four cards, but they really improve the game. No longer can you easily guess which colors your opponents need. It almost seems like the designer had a better idea for scoring that he was able to add with these cards.
2014-09-17
Modern Art (1992)
7
Nov 2009*
7.182
Prev. Owned
Plays: 3
Very good auction game - I love all the varied types of auctions as well as the valuation system. However, I find the bidding process difficult - it's very mathy to come up with just the right value, and one person who miscalculates badly can throw the game off. The card game edition does most of the good stuff while eliminating the tricky money component!
2014-10-09
7
Aug 2013
5.492
Owned
Plays: 2
This has a couple interesting dynamics that set it apart from standard Monopoly.

Most importantly, the goal is now to reach a set amount of cash, rather than bankrupt your opponents. You are also not allowed to mortgage properties or sell back houses unless it is to avoid bankruptcy, so cash means cash. This creates an interesting choice when it comes to spending money on property and houses. After a couple rounds, you make $250K just for passing Go, and the goal is $1M, so there is a temptation to just not buy anything. But if you do that, and land on opponent's properties, then you'll have no way to get that money back from them.

The cash chips rather than paper money is nice, and speeds play. In fact, this whole game could be considered a "Monopoly Express", as many of the refinements here seem to be designed to speed the game, which is always welcome when it comes to Monopoly.

UPDATE Feb 2015:
Yeah, this is probably my "favorite" version of Monopoly due to its quick play. It actually feels like a board game version of the Monopoly Deal card game, if you can wrap your head around that.
2015-02-03
Uberplay Motley Fool version
Year: 2005
7
Mar 2007*
5.859
Prev. Owned
Plays: 1
I like the way the market works, but dry dry dry.
2013-08-14
7
Nov 2012
6.407
Plays: 2
English second edition
Year: 2009
7
May 2015
6.657
Prev. Owned
Plays: 8
I like this game, but I also feel I have not yet played it enough to truly appreciate the depth that seems to be waiting here.

The rules, however, are a mess. I don't think I've ever had so much trouble with a rulebook as this one. Once you get past it, the game is not very complicated. I think the problem is mainly that the first half of the rules should be last. You need to read the rules all the way through before you have any idea what's going on.

If it weren't for the rules issue, I would say this this is a great game to give as a gift. The cards are very high quality and the box is amazing.

UPDATE May 2015: I finally played this game again after many years. This one one of the first games I bought when I was getting into the modern era of boardgames, and I've been finding it very interesting how my tastes have changes (matured?) over the years.

Where I originally thought I had an inability to grasp the strategy of the game, during my latest plays I instead felt like there are many uncontrollable elements, and that your performance is largely based on luck. So my tastes are either more refined now, or I've just become arrogant I also found the flow kinda clunky. Sometimes you draw a bunch of melds and end the hand quickly, and other times both players stall for a while until someone finally draws the right card.

I think my latest plays really made me appreciate the durability of "Lost Cities", a game that also has you collecting sets but avoids the uneven performance of JtR.

2015-08-18
No Merci (2006)
AMIGO multilingual edition
Year: 2006
7
Apr 2014
6.939
Owned
Plays: 21
Fast and fun. It's all about playing the odds and mitigating risk. Lots of luck is usually required to win, however. Not as good a filler game as Category 5 or Coloretto, but it is quicker that both of these.
2006-09-22*
English first edition
Year: 2010
7
Nov 2012
6.399
Prev. Owned
Plays: 3
Better theme suggestion: Castle Wolfenstein!

The genius of this game is that it is more fun to be the one sneaking around, and in this game everyone but one player gets to sneak. The drawback is that the line-of-sight is unnecessarily fiddly due to the design of the board, and the game can easily be ruined by players misjudging line of sight. It's not like a player can ask for clarification without giving their position away, either.

This game should have used something like the Tannhauser system for clarifying line of sight (hmm, maybe I could mod the board? Feels like too much work), or just settled for a simpler map.

UPDATE: I'm afraid this game is falling between the cracks for me in the "Hide and Seek" genre. With gamers, I'd rather play Letters from Whitechapel or Fury of Dracula. With my kids, I'd rather play Ghost Chase or Flurch Der Mummie. Nuns on the Run was supposed to be my casual gamer game of this type. The problem is, it is just too fiddly and too easy for Nun players to make a mistake. They can't ask questions during the game without spoiling things (giving away their position), and that is the kiss of death for "gateway games." I realized this when I had the perfect group of 6 casual gamers, and passed NotR on by because I didn't want to try to teach and referee it. How are you ever supposed to use the line of sight ruler that comes with the game without giving away your position, anyway? Consequently, this game is neither well suited for competitive nor casual play.

I stand by my "Tannhauser" comment above!
2013-05-25
English first edition
Year: 2014
7
Feb 2015
7.086
Prev. Owned
Plays: 5
This dice game has some nice features. I like how the character's powers are largely implemented by giving them different dice. The game also presents some interesting choices. Ultimately, however, I think that whether you win or not or predominantly a function of how well you roll, and that calls into question whether the choices you make are really all that meaningful.
2015-02-16
English first edition
Year: 2013
7
Oct 2014
7.325
Prev. Owned
Plays: 10
On its surface, it is mainly just flip a card, roll some dice. However, there are some interesting decisions to be made, and teamwork between characters is key. I find it strangely compelling in a way that Descent 2 was not for me. Perhaps there is some merit in stripping the idea down to its essence. I think the idea of slowing developing my character is the hook for me. Whether that is enough to keep me interested through 6 adventure decks remains to be seen.

UPDATE Oct 2014:
We're about halfway through adventure 1, and the shine is starting to come off this a bit. We'll see how far we get. I think that the most interesting thing about this game is the way you build your character, and while that is fairly novel for this type of game, I am not sure I ultimately find that compelling enough to sustain my enthusiasm.

UPDATE Nov 2014:
Well, my son (age 7) gave me a very well reasoned agruement as to why Pathfinder was not his favorite game. "I have to wait 10 minutes between my turns, and when it is my turn I barely know what I'm doing." Fair enough. As for me, I am finding the game repetitive, and gaining a +1 here and there is no longer thrilling me. I am also perplexed as to how I continue to find this game so finicky to deal with rules-wise.
I think I'll be turning to Lord of the Rings Card Game for a similar questing card game, but with more interesting mechanisms. I'm also looking forward to Assault on Doomrock, which I hope will be more of what I hoped to get out of Pathfinder. I just don't think the long campaign thing is for me with this particular game. I think this game may be too reliant on the appeal of slowly leveling up, and the game guts underneath aren't really interesting and varied enough to sustain the game long-term.



2014-11-17
English Edition 2004
Year: 2004
7
Nov 2014
6.481
Owned
For Trade
Plays: 4
There's a lot of things going on at once with this game, but they're all managable, and I enjoy this game very much.

UPDATE Nov2014: I just played this game for the first time in 8 years, and I have to say I think it's been replaced in nearly every way (thematically, mechanistically) by Jamaica. One player will probably get knocked out of a game of Pirate's Cove very early on, and that may be frustrating for them. However, my kids liked it, and it still looks great,
2014-11-01
Funforge Edition
Year: 2009
7
Apr 2013
5.972
Prev. Owned
Plays: 6
Sounds outstanding. I'm imagining something with the same general feel as Jamaica, with the added element of bluffing! Dice + push-your-luck + bluffing + flicking + cowboys = home run for my lunch group. #1 on my wish list right now.

UPDATE: Bought it, played it, and it's just as fun as I hoped.
2010-02-18
Portrayal (2005)
Braincog Inc English edition 2005
Year: 2005
7
Jul 2013
6.385
Owned
Plays: 5
Power Grid (2004)
7
Dec 2009*
7.918
Prev. Owned
Plays: 1
This is definitely a very finely balanced game. I don't even try to do all the math that's probably required to play optimally. I like it, but wish it was a little more intuitive and less calculative.

I also don't in general like it when gaming turn order is a critical part of the game.
2014-11-04
Rio Grande Games Edition
Year: 2000
7
Oct 2014
7.499
Prev. Owned
Plays: 1
In general structure, this feels a lot like Goa, and I think I like Goa more. Nevertheless, PoF is one of those wonderful games where there are so many strategic options and so few turns to accomplish them in. This is a great game to play with people who want deep strategy but not direct confrontation.
2015-08-06
English first edition 2011
Year: 2011
7
May 2015
6.770
Prev. Owned
Plays: 6
It's just fun, and becomes just strategic enough with the Expert Culling Variant (with the house rules that triggering all "Scoring" abilities whether or not you cull for points if the creature survives, and allowing the culling of a different used die if you chose not the cull the creature).

UPDATE May 2015: After getting the iPad app, I've recently played this a lot more than I ever did with the physical game, and I'm starting to wonder how much of my affection for the game is based on physically handling those dice. The game design itself is maybe not so interesting to me, and I find it troublesome to have to continually reference the cards to know what each die does. I do love. The bag full of dice idea in theory, but I don't so much enjoy the flow of the game.

I think that Puzzle Strike is a more strategic and less fiddly version of this deck building battle concept.
2015-05-12
Quarto! (1991)
7
Sep 2010
6.525
Owned
Plays: 18
Gamewright English edition
Year: 2003
7
Oct 2011
5.968
Owned
Plays: 36
English first edition
Year: 2008
7
Feb 2015
6.268
Prev. Owned
Plays: 2
This game is lighter and smoother playing than I had anticipated, and the latter reason is why I think I like it. With the recent trends toward brutally complex co-ops (which I do love also, don't get me wrong), I can also appreciate one that is just wacky and easy to play.

I favor the first edition of this with the smaller box for its item tiles rather than cards and the improved portability.

2015-01-22
English first edition
Year: 2004
7
Sep 2010
5.901
Prev. Owned
Plays: 2
This is a good bidding game that is similar to, but not quite as good as, Turn the Tide. I don't know why there's so much complaining about the "Relationship" theme. Would we really prefer another game about impressing renaissance ponces?
2010-03-23
English second edition
Year: 2009
7
Mar 2013
6.497
Prev. Owned
Plays: 1
This is a decent game that combines an interesting blind bidding mechanism with area majority. But all-in-all, I'd rather play Mission Red Planet when I'm in the mood for this type of game.
2013-03-05
7
Sep 2010
6.163
Prev. Owned
Lots better than regular risk. This is the game that got my wife back into boardgaming in the early 2000's. A few of the cards add to the luck, but also to the excitement. The time limit built into the game is much appreciated. More like regular Risk than is Risk 2210AD.
2012-02-11
RoboRally (1994)
7
Oct 2014
7.102
Plays: 1
English first edition
Year: 2010
7
Aug 2015
7.453
Owned
For Trade
Plays: 4
I really wanted to love this game because it has so much cool stuff going on. But in the end I found it too restrictive and it just didn't all come together for me.
Or it may just be that I always lose badly. However, if I am going to spend so long playing a game, I think I prefer it to be more focused in scope, with freer choice of actions, and less luck dependent. I actually think Conquest of Nerath does the hero side-quest thing better.

I am also troubled that the map setup is so critical. You can easily lose the game before the first turn if you aren't very careful with the positioning of your home realm.
2015-08-28
7
Aug 2015
6.893
Owned
For Trade
Plays: 4
I would say that if you've played Runewars a couple times and like it enough to keep playing, you should get this expansion. The new cards are great, and I also really like using the more powerful cities. I am not sure the commanders are worth the trouble though. Nothing here changes the game too much, but the added variety is great to have.
2015-08-07
7
Sep 2015
7.585
Owned
For Trade
Plays: 1
It is fun to pull the levers on this victory point generating machine. I worry only about replayability. What is to stop me from just doing the same thing every time? Are the engineers really enough to mix up the strategy?
2015-08-06
San Juan (2004)
7
Mar 2009*
7.218
Owned
Plays: 5
Say Anything (2008)
7
Mar 2011
6.669
Prev. Owned
Plays: 3
7
Aug 2006*
5.466
Owned
hurts just enough to be hilarous
2006-08-23*
7
Apr 2013
6.023
Owned
Plays: 15
Snorta! (2004)
7
Apr 2012
5.871
Owned
Plays: 5
Multilingual second edition
Year: 2009
7
Jan 2015
6.764
Prev. Owned
Plays: 1
English edition
Year: 2009
7
Mar 2015
7.307
Prev. Owned
Plays: 6
Don't get me wrong, this is a very good game with a wonderful production. However, I think the general opinion on Space Hulk may be somewhat inflated by nostalgia and awesome paint jobs. This is probably sacrilege, but I'd probably have preferred less over-the-top minis. Personally, I don't find it to be the masterpiece it seems to be revered as and think DOOM the Boardgame is overall a more interesting sci-fi pew pew fix.
2015-03-26
7
Sep 2010
5.751
Owned
Plays: 11
Fun, well-exploited theme on this one. Get the large monkey height card from the files section though - the card-sized one that comes with the game is too small. And for $20 I'd expect a better box and a die!
2007-08-29*
First edition
Year: 2002
7
Apr 2009*
6.590
Prev. Owned
Plays: 7
Simple, fast, and fun. The wide range of available characters and their disparate abilities keep this one interesting.
2007-03-17*
Stupiduel (2004)
7
Oct 2005*
5.568
Owned
For Trade
Plays: 3
An excellent game of creativity and storytelling. This is a fun way to stimulate brainstorming sessions of any kind.
2005-10-31*
Sun Tzu (2005)
7
Nov 2007*
6.330
Owned
Plays: 5
Z-Man First Edition
Year: 2006
7
Nov 2012
5.668
Prev. Owned
Plays: 1
Very good condition. No box insert, components bagged.
2013-01-25
Talisman (1983)
7
May 2013
6.163
Owned
Plays: 1
I think the game's a true classic and I had a lot of fun playing this with my college buddies. As long as you're in no hurry when you play, this can be a great time. We had a house rule that you had to take off your pants for the duration of your time as a Toad to suitably add to the humiliation.

UPDATE:
These days I need to be in the right mood to enjoy this one, but I still appreciate it for what it is, and the nostalgia love remains strong.
2012-12-08
7
Jul 2014
5.791
Owned
I love 2nd edition Talisman and this just adds to the fun with some high powered monsters and new dragon-slayer characters.
2006-10-04*
7
Jul 2014
6.253
Owned
Gotta have it. More cards.
2006-10-04*
7
Jul 2014
5.640
Owned
I like the Timescape. Dangerous, but potentially very profitable.
2005-05-12*
7
Jul 2014
6.218
Owned
I dig the alternate endings.
2006-10-04*
English edition 2009
Year: 2009
7
Nov 2014
7.180
Owned
Plays: 4
Mayfair edition 2001
Year: 2001
7
Feb 2011
5.635
Owned
Prev. Owned
Plays: 2
This is an enjoyable, thoughtful game. The rulebook isn't THAT bad except for 2 errors: 1) it doesn't make explicit that Theo already HAS the restricted reagents listed on his experiment card, and 2) on the back cover under the Scoring heading, "restricted" should be replaced with "forbidden". In both theme and general gameplay, Theo strikes me as a super-advanced version of Igor: The Mad Scientist's Lament. However, there are many more choices to make in this game, and the action point system works very well. You can do just about anything you'd like but at the cost of more action points for the most helpful actions. This one's a sleeper in my opinion, and is considerably better than its BGG rating. Scales well from 2-5 players, but a 5 player game may seem a bit long.
2007-01-20*
7
Jul 2004*
5.566
Owned
This was my Dad's and I used to like playing this solo.
2004-07-26*
Thunderstone (2009)
7
Aug 2013
6.928
Plays: 19
First Edition
Year: 2011
7
Aug 2013
6.996
Prev. Owned
Plays: 3
If you are new to Thunderstone, skip the original set and just get this. This is better tuned and fuller featured!

For a pure deck-building experience I would still choose Dominion. For a thematic card game adventure, I think I prefer Sentinels of the Multiverse. Even with all the fiddliness for SotM, it is somewhat less annoying that the Thunderstone math. So while I have had some fun with TS, these two games have knocked TS off my shelf. It is actually a fairly shallow deckbuilding experience, and too beholden to the Dominion framework to execute very well on the theme.

2013-09-08
7
Dec 2012
7.050
Plays: 2
I find Thurn & Taxis quite enjoyable, but it's more the kind of satisfaction I get from completing a puzzle rather than the excitement of a competitive GAME.
2012-12-19
English edition
Year: 2006
7
Aug 2013
5.983
Prev. Owned
Plays: 2
Best meeples ever?
2007-03-25*
Rio Grande English Edition 2001
Year: 2001
7
Feb 2015
6.990
Prev. Owned
Plays: 2
A great game where everything is negotiable. I need to create more opportunities to play this one.

UPDATE Feb 2015:
I finally after many years played it again. I have since had experience with other negotiation games, including Chinatown, Lords of Vegas, and I'm the Boss, and in comparison I find ToG rather ponderous.
2015-02-06
First black box edition
Year: 2009
7
Mar 2014
6.144
Prev. Owned
Plays: 1
Troyes (2010)
7
Oct 2011
7.572
Plays: 4
Gamewright English edition 2004
Year: 2004
7
Sep 2014
6.552
Prev. Owned
Plays: 4
I really like the way you pass your cards around after each hand. The game feels similar to For Sale, which I also like quite a bit, but Turn the Tide might be a better game. However, For Sale gets a lot more plays.

UPDATE Sept 2014: This is a nice design, but I just don't find it as fun as For Sale or 6 Nimmt! Also, the requirement to play one hand per player can make this feel too long.
2014-09-24
English first edition
Year: 2011
7
Apr 2013
5.993
Owned
For Trade
Plays: 2
Uptown (2007)
Funagain Games edition
Year: 2007
7
Nov 2011
6.355
Owned
Plays: 3
Ravensburger German edition
Year: 2009
7
Mar 2011
5.717
Owned
For Trade
Plays: 2
Pretty luck driven with some strategy. Fun!

Great art on the tiles.

I like that it comes with the Worminator.
2011-03-25
7
Apr 2013
5.868
Owned
Plays: 3
I'm surprised how much I like this game. It's tense, fast, and of course, cheap. I'd recommend using chips, stones, or coins to mark completed pipes before you start picking them up!
2005-04-20*
7
Jan 2015
6.009
Owned
English First edition
Year: 2012
7
Mar 2015
6.832
Prev. Owned
Plays: 1
Parker Brothers English first edition
Year: 2008
7
Apr 2014
5.855
Owned
Plays: 2
Yahtzee done right. However, "Easy Come Easy Go" gets to the same place with less hassle!
2012-08-18
Twilight Creations English edition 2003
Year: 2003
7
Jan 2011
5.947
Prev. Owned
Probably the best expansion. I like Zombies!!!, but after purchasing 1-3.5, I think I'm done adding to it!
2011-01-14
7
Apr 2013
6.051
Owned
1 to 174 of 174   Page 1. 1
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.