The Hotness
Games|People|Company
Eclipse
Gunship: First Strike!
Mage Knight: Board Game
Midnight Men
Agricola: Die Bauern und das liebe Vieh
Hawaii
Star Wars: Battle of Hoth
Wiz-War
Ora et Labora
Rex: Final Days of an Empire
Snowdonia
Barbarian Prince
The Lord of the Rings: The Card Game
Twilight Struggle
War of the Ring
Agricola
7 Wonders
A Game of Thrones: The Board Game (second edition)
Dominion
7 Wonders: Cities
Kingdoms
A Few Acres of Snow
Risk Legacy
Arkham Horror
Through the Ages: A Story of Civilization
Thunderstone Advance: Towers of Ruin
1812: The Invasion of Canada
Dixit: Journey
Elder Sign
D-Day Dice
The Castles of Burgundy
Le Havre
Kingdom Builder
Sid Meier's Civilization: The Board Game
Race for the Galaxy
Cosmic Encounter
Dominant Species
Dungeon Petz
Battlestar Galactica
Power Grid
Mansions of Madness
Last Will
Twilight Imperium (third edition)
Nexus Ops
Agents of SMERSH
Puerto Rico
Star Trek: Fleet Captains
Kairo
Core Worlds
Sherlock Holmes Consulting Detective
Recommend
12 
 Thumb up
 Thumb up
1 Posts

Take Stock» Forums » Reviews

Subject: Does two-player Take Stock bust tit for tat play? rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
John Morgan
United States
Tucson
Arizona
designer
publisher
Avatar
mbmbmbmb
Note: This review is focused on playing Take Stock with only two players. It is not a review of components or game play in general. I may at a later time do a full game review.

On of the things that I do not like in two-player games is the tit for tat play (TFT). In many two-player games, if you do X (ex: gain 5 victory points) then i do counter X (ex: make you loose 5 victory points) and the sum result is no gain for either player. Another form of TFT is, if you do X (ex: get a bonus such as larger hand size) then i do X as well (ex: get a bonus such as larger hand size) and again the sum result is no gain for either player. This can go on ad nauseam, making for a boring game that is won by the player that is able to perform tit that the opponent can't respond with tat.

Very good news, Take Stock does much to prevent a game of TFT.

The first TFT buster is the draw of the cards. Like most card games, Take Stock has the element of luck with the cards you draw. But, since Take Stock is not a "draw one, play one" exercise, you can mitigate a lot of that luck with good hand management.



The second TFT buster is hand management. Whenever, you "take stock", that is save a stock certificate, your hand size is reduced. This becomes a slight disadvantage for you as you have reduced your playing resources in favor of scoring resources. On the other hand, if you opponent doesn't save stock certificates and reduce his own hand, he gives you the advantage of controlling when the round ends. This is due to the fact that one way a round ends is a player discards their last card.



The third TFT buster is the number of play options. On my turn I can increase the price of a stock, perform a market event, save a market event for another turn, play a saved market event or save stock certificates. I can increase the price of a stock I have invested in, but my opponent cannot directly reduce the price of that stock. For market events, both saved and immediate, there may be some opportunity for your opponent to tit your tat by playing a counter market event but the odds are not in favor of that happening. Saving stock certificates is the closest to a TFT play in Take Stock. I can save three certificates in tech and my opponent can answer by saving three certificates in tech, that is if he has the cards for it.



The fourth TFT buster is the stock option tokens. My opponent may go out after taking the lead or catching up in a stock for which we both hold certificates. My opponent was able to end the round to his advantage, but if I have stock option tokens I can mitigate damage or even gain advantage. I can play my stock options to get certificates out of my hand and into scoring position. But with only four tokens I have to choose when it is most advantageous to do so.

Conclusion
So my conclusion is that Take Stock plays quite well with two players. A game can be kept close by strategic play rather than TFT play. Most games seem to be close down to the wire. I am not saying that decisive victories are not possible, they are just the exception rather than the rule. So if you are looking for a fun two-player game, I would... ummm... Take Stock!
5 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.