geek
Recently Viewed
Hot Games
Dominion
Agricola
Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
Titan
Pirate King
Battlestar Galactica
Le Havre
Race for the Galaxy
Pandemic
Settlers of Catan, The
Conflict of Heroes: Awakening the Bear! - Russia 1941-1942
Space Alert
Ghost Stories
Puerto Rico
Red November
Municipium
Arkham Horror
Power Grid
Twilight Struggle
Through the Ages: A Story of Civilization
Carcassonne
Race for the Galaxy: The Gathering Storm
Formula D
Last Night on Earth: The Zombie Game
Chicago Express
Stone Age
War of the Ring
Risk
A Touch of Evil, The Supernatural Game
Wasabi!
Tigris & Euphrates
World of WarCraft Miniatures Game
Apples to Apples
Galaxy Trucker
Ticket to Ride
Descent: Journeys in the Dark
Kingsburg
Twilight Imperium 3rd Edition
StarCraft: The Board Game
Monsterpocalypse
BattleLore
Bakugan Battle Brawlers
Scrabble
Age of Empires III: The Age of Discovery
Snow Tails
Caylus
After the Flood
Munchkin Quest
Playing Gods: The Board Game of Divine Domination
Carcassonne - The Catapult
Rules | Subscriptions | Bookmarks | Search | Account | Moderators
Scott Alden
flag
BGG Admin
Avatar
0405060708
I've made some changes to the user moderation system, based on user feedback and further thoughts regarding how I want the system to work.

First, thumbs down are gone. In their place, you can flag items as rules violations, but you can't flag something down just because you think it is lame.

Second, thumbs and flags are totally separate; flags will no longer reduce the thumbs up count, and thumbs up will not offset flags.

Posts which are flagged as rules violations by enough users will still be collapsed, like now, but you will still have the option to turn off this filtering. Because thumbs up no longer offset flags, I'm not sure yet what threshold we'll use to collapse messages - I'll be tweaking it over the coming days.

While you can still see the thumbs count, the flags count is secret. This is intended to make it harder for people to "gang up" against a post people will have no idea whether a post has garnered flags, and so can't "pile on." This also should reduce hurt feelings unless a post receives enough flags to hide it, you'll never know it was flagged.

When you flag something as a rules violation, you must choose an option to explain which rule you believe is being violated. This will also be secret, but if I see evidence of individual users flagging posts for trivial reasons, they will lose the ability to moderate forums.

I have removed the lame clause, but in exchange, I have a serious favor to ask: if your post is flagged by enough people to hide it, do not complain about this. In particular, do not try to argue about whether you really violated a rule. Consider such a complaint to be in itself a rules violation, subject to being flagged.
Colin Hunter
flag
Avatar
060708
Thank you thank you thank you!!!!!!
Mike Jones
flag
Avatar
060708
Thank you Aldie.
Big Woo
flag
Avatar
05060708
Hurah!
Pierre Pinguet
flag
Avatar
0608
Hhmm, when I click on "Rules" , a pop up ask me to log on dev.boardgamegeek.com... A loose end of the new code?
Big Woo
flag
Avatar
05060708
Polls have proven to be quite popular though, are you considering a system for that Aldie?
Eddie the Cranky Monkey
flag
Avatar
0506
Aldie!

All posts with 0 or less thumbs are showing up below my threshold, however my threshold is set to -5. Don't know whats up, but it makes the forums basically unreadable.
Larry Haskell
flag
Avatar
0708
Is this related to posts with no thumbs being collapsed? It says they are below my threshold, but when I follow that link it says "Show All"

[EDIT]

OK -- fixed! :)

And I approve heartily of the distinction between "Thumbs" and "Concerns"

Last edited on 2007-03-15 20:28:22 CST (Total Number of Edits: 2)
Chuck Easterlin
flag
Avatar
060708
Wow... I need to check my defaults... things are being collapsed quickly and for no reason.

:(
Alvin Chen
flag
Avatar
0407
When I saw the flags start popping up, I realized that a bug I posted is probably related to the changes.

http://www.boardgamegeek.com/thread/156508

Basically, a lot of zero-thumb posts are getting hidden by default, even though my threshold is still set at -5. In fact, my own post was hidden by default. On the other hand, other zero-thumb posts are still showing up. It looks like the formula for calculating thresholds may have gotten dumped or mixed up in the changeover to the flag system.
Eddie the Cranky Monkey
flag
Avatar
0506
Aldie wrote:

I have removed the lame clause, but in exchange, I have a serious favor to ask: if your post is flagged by enough people to hide it, do not complain about this. In particular, do not try to argue about whether you really violated a rule. Consider such a complaint to be in itself a rules violation, subject to being flagged.


You do realize you just validated lynch mobs? (i.e. as long as enough people disagree with you, it doesn't matter what you said you are wrong)
Adam Skinner
flag
Avatar
apotheos wrote:
Aldie wrote:

I have removed the lame clause, but in exchange, I have a serious favor to ask: if your post is flagged by enough people to hide it, do not complain about this. In particular, do not try to argue about whether you really violated a rule. Consider such a complaint to be in itself a rules violation, subject to being flagged.


You do realize you just validated lynch mobs? (i.e. as long as enough people disagree with you, it doesn't matter what you said you are wrong)


You never know which one of us is a werewolf.
Frank La Terra
flag
Avatar
0506
Awww, now how will my stalkers be able to snipe at me?
Maybe they'll start throwing bricks at my car.
21