DragonCat wrote:
Value for money is not only the question it is the answer here......
I think the question on value for money is to do with what you value. I have over 500 games and I certainly haven't had value out of all of them. Where I have had good value it's been for all sorts of reasons:-
- Played a lot so cost per session is small.
- Had to translate rules (even when in English!)and work out how to play.
- Produced player aids or redesigned components
- Gained GeekGold and lots of BGG interaction for rules, player aids etc.
- Game is hot on BGG so good to be involved in discussions.
- Wonderful components so just nice to have.
- Interesting theme so spent time researching and reading up.
- Game offers itself to variants so again time working out and discussing on BGG.
- Game has had educational value for family members
- Bits were useful in other games

- Game worked as a gateway game for friend or family member.
- Rare or part of a set etc.(the collector motive)
Any of these or a combination can mean that I feel I've had value for money as I've spent interesting leisure time on the game or some aspect of it.
As for RftG, I think it'll justify itself on my first point above. (And it's by Tom Lehmann!

)
Chris
Last edited on 2007-07-09 04:59:16 CST (Total Number of Edits: 1)