geek
Rules | Subscriptions | Bookmarks | Search | Account | Moderators
Recommend
27 Posts
1 , 2  Next »   | 
New Thread | Printer Friendly | Subscribe  | Bookmark
Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Jerry Dziuba
flag
Game Designer
Avatar
04
Verkisto's typo thread brought me to this...

I'm guessing through consistent use the pluralization of e-mail with e-mails has become acceptable, but it hits my ear like sledgehammer. The second that word enters the fray whatever else follows is lost on me as my brain begins spinning out of control.

Am I wrong in this? Isn't e-mail considered an "aggregate noun" like the word mail itself since it's a shortened "electronic mail"? Does anyone walk to their mailbox and say "Look at all the mails we got today?"

E-mails sounds like baby talk to me, and I always want to reply to "Man, I got a lot of e-mails! with "Whatsa matter, you gots a whatta e-mails to wead? Oh poor wittle boy."

I know it's become socially acceptable as I hear it everywhere, but that doesn't mean it's right!
Scott Firestone
flag
Avatar
050708
"I took three days off, and when I came back there were 247 email waiting for me."

Yeah...that sounds like Beethoven to me.
Ken B.
flag
Avatar
My Pokemans. Let me show you them.
Jerry Dziuba
flag
Game Designer
Avatar
04
Scott Firestone IV wrote:
I took three days off, and when I came back there were 247 email waiting for me.


Would you go to your mailbox and say "I took three days off, and when I came back there were 247 mail waiting for me."?

Scott Firestone
flag
Avatar
050708
Nick Danger wrote:
Scott Firestone IV wrote:
I took three days off, and when I came back there were 247 email waiting for me.


Would you go to your mailbox and say "I took three days off, and when I came back there were 247 mail waiting for me."?



No, I'd say "247 letters" or "things."

keep away from all the deers
(this one drives an English teacher friend of ours crazy :devil:)
Jerry Dziuba
flag
Game Designer
Avatar
04
Scott Firestone IV wrote:
No, I'd say "247 letters" or "things."


Exactly. So instead of "e-mails" you use "messages".
Scott Firestone
flag
Avatar
050708
Nick Danger wrote:

Exactly. So instead of "e-mails" you use "messages".


Should I also put periods outside the quotation marks? I thought we were trying to be "right." :p
My son has thousands of Legos.
Jerry Dziuba
flag
Game Designer
Avatar
04
Scott Firestone IV wrote:
Should I also put periods outside the quotation marks? I thought we were trying to be "right."


No, I was wrong with that. I know that this is the internet and I should never admit to being wrong, but when I am I admit it.

The thing about punctuation is that it doesn't hit my ears.
Last edited on 2007-10-19 12:11:26 CST (Total Number of Edits: 1)
Jeff Wiles
flag
Game Designer
Avatar
040506070809
Jawas always sounds wrong to me as a plural, but Jawa sounds wrong too.
Paul DeStefano
flag
Game Designer
Avatar
05060708
jeffwiles wrote:
Jawas always sounds wrong to me as a plural, but Jawa sounds wrong too.


Jawai.
Tim Franklin
flag
Avatar
05060708
Scott Firestone IV wrote:

Should I also put periods outside the quotation marks? I thought we were trying to be "right." :p


See, that's a style rule that offends me both aesthetically and logically, but I probably just need to get out more.

Back to the original topic, I think 'email' is rapidly becoming both the collective noun - "I have a lot of email" - and a distinct object synonymous with 'message' - "I have 1000 unread emails". I'd prefer "I have 1000 unread messages" for the latter, but it grates a whole lot less than a lot of other things - particularly "legos".
Jeff Wiles
flag
Game Designer
Avatar
040506070809
Geosphere wrote:
jeffwiles wrote:
Jawas always sounds wrong to me as a plural, but Jawa sounds wrong too.


Jawai.


Or Jawae?
Scott Firestone
flag
Avatar
050708
tim-pelican wrote:


See, that's a style rule that offends me both aesthetically and logically, but I probably just need to get out more.


Out of the UK, at least. ;)

As an editor, I'd probably change it to "messages," but we're--understandably--more forgiving when it comes to the "correctness" of the spoken word compared to the written.

If someone uses "emails" in a conversation, do you have to stop and wonder what he or she is talking about? No? Then mission accomplished.

(And this is coming from someone who sympathizes with you, Dave.)

BTW: When was the last time you heard someone use furnitures, traffics, or polices?
Jerry Dziuba
flag
Game Designer
Avatar
04
Scott Firestone IV wrote:
BTW: When was the last time you heard someone use furnitures, traffics, or polices?


Are you ever around children? I hear those kinds of words often from the mouths of kids. My son uttered "furnitures" just this past weekend. That's why I said e-mails sounded like baby talk to me.

Eric "I too have discovered that really long user names are funnier than short ones" Mowrer
flag
Avatar
060708
I'm sorry, I set up my computer to send me internets whenever there were replies to this thread, but they didn't work. Pipes must be clogged today. So,.... what did I miss?
'Bernard Wingrave'
flag
0708
I don't like it when people say "maths" as an abbreviation for "mathematics". I like "math" better.

And I like getting e-mail. And messages. And spam is plural, right?
Tim Franklin
flag
Avatar
05060708
bwingrave wrote:
I don't like it when people say "maths" as an abbreviation for "mathematics". I like "math" better.


That's left-pond / right-pond again, I guess. "Maths" is the standard, accepted abbreviation in the UK - I didn't know it got used as an option in the US.

Tim Franklin
flag
Avatar
05060708
Scott Firestone IV wrote:
tim-pelican wrote:


See, that's a style rule that offends me both aesthetically and logically, but I probably just need to get out more.


Out of the UK, at least. ;)


Out of coding, too, which is where the 'logical' part comes in. If it's not part of the string, it doesn't go inside the string delimiters. Then again, I'll happily nest brackets in written communication too, although I try not to do it in formal documentation.

That sets me off on another thought - brackets (), curly-brackets {}, square-brackets []?

Or parentheses (), brackets {}, square-brackets []?

I'm not sure if that's a geographical split, a coder / writer one, or something else entirely...
John Snyderâ„¢
flag
Avatar
0405060708
[These are brackets]

{I don't know what these are}

This is also teh be$t thr3@d evar, btw.

O.o
Dangit! Suspended Again
flag
Avatar
040506070809
{These are braces. Not to be confused with suspenders.}
Level 25 Brute
flag
Avatar
040506070809
int thisThread(int meaning) {
int death = 100;
int[] trueMeaning {42, 0, death};
if(meaning <= trueMeaning[2]) {

return trueMeaning[0];
} else {
return ‽;
}
}
Last edited on 2007-10-20 10:34:00 CST (Total Number of Edits: 1)
Tim Franklin
flag
Avatar
05060708
MisterCranky wrote:
{These are braces. Not to be confused with suspenders.}


Nonono. Braces go on your teeth. Bracers hold your trousers up. Suspenders are an undergarment for ladies to stop their stockings falling down.

Much hilarity is to be derived in the UK from belt-less Americans under suspicion of being transvestites :devil:

Dangit! Suspended Again
flag
Avatar
040506070809
tim-pelican wrote:
MisterCranky wrote:
{These are braces. Not to be confused with suspenders.}


Nonono. Braces go on your teeth. Bracers hold your trousers up. Suspenders are an undergarment for ladies to stop their stockings falling down.

Much hilarity is to be derived in the UK from belt-less Americans under suspicion of being transvestites :devil:


OMG another horrific lecture from the purveyors of Bangers and Mash, shed-you-ull, eh wot?, and gor blimey.
1 , 2  Next »   | 
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
BoardGameGeek and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.