The Hotness
Games|People|Company
Eclipse
Gunship: First Strike!
Mage Knight: Board Game
Midnight Men
Agricola: Die Bauern und das liebe Vieh
Hawaii
Star Wars: Battle of Hoth
Wiz-War
Ora et Labora
Rex: Final Days of an Empire
Snowdonia
Barbarian Prince
The Lord of the Rings: The Card Game
Twilight Struggle
War of the Ring
Agricola
7 Wonders
A Game of Thrones: The Board Game (second edition)
Dominion
7 Wonders: Cities
Kingdoms
A Few Acres of Snow
Risk Legacy
Arkham Horror
Through the Ages: A Story of Civilization
Thunderstone Advance: Towers of Ruin
1812: The Invasion of Canada
Dixit: Journey
Elder Sign
D-Day Dice
The Castles of Burgundy
Le Havre
Kingdom Builder
Sid Meier's Civilization: The Board Game
Race for the Galaxy
Cosmic Encounter
Dominant Species
Dungeon Petz
Battlestar Galactica
Power Grid
Mansions of Madness
Last Will
Twilight Imperium (third edition)
Nexus Ops
Agents of SMERSH
Puerto Rico
Star Trek: Fleet Captains
Kairo
Core Worlds
Sherlock Holmes Consulting Detective
Recommend
3 
 Thumb up
 Thumb up
10 Posts

1861: The Railways of the Russian Empire» Forums » Variants

Subject: 1861 variant. rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Graham Lockwood
Australia
Blacktown
NSW
designer
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Rule 6.5.4
Existing rule: A route may include no more stations & red off-board hexes than the number of the train. Intermediate small stations may be skipped, large stations may not (exception 5+5E train).

Variant:
Intermediate small stations may be included in a run & need not count towards a trains' range. However they must only be counted between the large stations used in the run when using this rule. If a run starts &/or ends on a small station, then those stations do count towards a trains' range.

This variant rule stimulates rail building to the small stations which tend to be missed out in the regular game. It also increases potential revenue for the Minor Companies as well as the Publics.
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Pierre Goyer
Canada
Montreal
Quebec
designer
Looking for a Publisher for a Grand Strategic all fronts WW2 card game
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Hi

Recently, we played this game twice as 4 player games and this is the first thing that we agreed on for our next playing(there are others).
Having found your thread after playing our games, I support your idea totally as nobody but nobody scored a minor station during the game (maybe once at the beginning).

With the regular rule, connecting these small stations is irrelevant and not historical.It is not even essential for connexions like in RRT. They could be removed from the mapboard without effect.

But I have only 2 games played and this game is hard to master, so maybe I am wrong. Experts can comment here...

Owll
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Chris Shaffer
United States
Portland
Oregon
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
I prefer the method found in 18AL and several other games - small stations are added to the value of your run, but do not count against the length of your train.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
J C Lawrence
United States
Campbell
California
designer
Avatar
Be careful. Adjusting the trains like that will tend to make the game much richer much faster, resulting in exaggerated balance problems.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Chris Shaffer
United States
Portland
Oregon
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
I should have said "I prefer games that use this method." I don't personally adjust 1861 in this manner. As clearclaw states, modifying this feature in an existing game can cause play balance issues. It also causes the problem that when you play with other players, you have to adjust what you've learned about the game to the real rules.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Devin Smith
Australia
Brisbane
Queensland
Avatar
mbmbmbmb
1861 in particular was playtested with the free whistlestops rule: it turns the late game into an exercise in driving around the board going to every town in existence and then ending up in Moscow.

The rule-as-written is fairly sensible, actually: train companies didn't really care about small towns under most circumstances, so 'stimulating route building towards small towns' is hardly historical. The converse rule, that one must count towns against your run, as in 1830 or 1825, encourages train companies to actively avoid towns, also ahistorical.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Ian Wilson
United Kingdom

designer
"1861 in particular was playtested with the free whistlestops rule: it turns the late game into an exercise in driving around the board going to every town in existence and then ending up in Moscow."

Devin is quite correct. In fact I remember one particular game, where a famous game-designer bored the rest of us in the endgame, by trying to add yet another dot town to his run (and everyone else's as well, of course). The rule promptly got changed.

Dot towns are far from pointless, however. They serve 3 functions in 1861:
a) They provide a useful back-up if your route isn't quite as long as your train,
b) They can ensure a minor has a route if it's neighbours are unfriendly, and
c) They upgrade in a more useful manner (more prongs & universal junction).
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Morgan Dontanville
United States
Brooklyn
New York
designer
publisher
Plate of Shrimp.
badge
Here we are folks, the dream we all dream of.
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
I reconsidered selling this. I thought that the track building and minor merging business was a blast, but there were things that really irked me. I'm thinking about playing this again with some serious tweaks. One, I'm just going to use 1830 rules for the stock and Two whistle stops are optional but count toward train limit if you use them.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Chris Shaffer
United States
Portland
Oregon
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
sisteray wrote:
whistle stops are optional but count toward train limit if you use them.


That's not a variant, that's the base game rules.
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Morgan Dontanville
United States
Brooklyn
New York
designer
publisher
Plate of Shrimp.
badge
Here we are folks, the dream we all dream of.
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
TheCat wrote:
sisteray wrote:
whistle stops are optional but count toward train limit if you use them.


That's not a variant, that's the base game rules.


Oh right. I remember now. They were just kind of pointless. Hmmm.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.