geek
The Hotness
Games|People|Company
Dominion - Stash Promo Card
Runewars
Dominion: Alchemy
Thunderstone
Dominion
Dungeon Lords
Alexander the Great
Agricola
Twilight Struggle
Murder at the Four Deuces
Stronghold
The Republic of Rome
Race for the Galaxy
Small World
Arkham Horror
Founding Fathers
Race for the Galaxy: The Brink of War
Through the Ages: A Story of Civilization
Vapor's Gambit
Battlestar Galactica
Chaos in the Old World
Le Havre
Last Night on Earth: The Zombie Game
Mystery Express
Puerto Rico
Endeavor
Power Grid
Vasco da Gama
Warhammer: Invasion
Descent: Journeys in the Dark
Space Hulk (3rd Edition)
Pandemic
Hansa Teutonica
Carson City
Campaign Manager 2008
War of the Ring
Livingstone
Cosmic Encounter
Stone Age
Le Havre: Le Grand Hameau
Tobago
Cosmic Encounter: Cosmic Incursion Expansion
Twilight Imperium 3rd Edition
Summoner Wars
War of the Ring Collector's Edition
Macao
Carcassonne
Dominion: Prosperity
Neuland
Steam
Rules | Subscriptions | Bookmarks | Search | Account | Moderators
raaf
Finland
Helsinki
flag msg tools
Avatar
patron07
-------------------------------

WARNING: SPOILER! If you don't want to know the details about the upcoming expansion before it is released, please read no further!

--------------------------------

Interview with Cyril Demaegd (Ystari, french publisher) on Tric Trac TV (in French, posted on Apr 18th): http://www.trictrac.net/index.php3?id=tv&inf=tv_flash&ref=11...
He talks about "The Gathering Storm" and the 2nd expansion.


For those who don't understand French, here you have a summary of the interview:

- 5 players, a new starting deck.

- He said that there aren't that many new cards, but they do have a great impact on the pace of the game and the way it is played. For example:
Improved Logistics: development, cost 3, 2 VP
Settle: May place a second military/non-military world (settle twice in one turn)
[Thanks to Brendon Russel for the text on the card: "Does not use any powers from the first world placed, do not draw a Settle bonus card for the second world"]

- Some worlds with explore power, including:
Deserted Alien World: cost 1, 2 VP
+1 explore (look)

- 4 new starting worlds:
Separatist Colony: cost 2, 1 VP (starting world 5)
+ 2 explore (look)
+ 1 military
[I couldn't read the text on the card!]

Ancient Race: genes windfall, cost 2, 1 VP (starting world 6)
starting hand 3 cards

Damaged Alien Factory: alien production/military, cost 3, 2 VP (starting world 7)
discard 1 card to produce

Doomed World: cost 1, -1 VP (starting world 8)
+1 explore (look)
can be discarded to place non-military world (except alien) -- just like the Colony Ship

- New 6-point developments:
Terraforming Guild:
2 VP / windfall world
2 VP / Terraforming card (including this one)
Settle: draw 1 card after settling
Produce: produce 1 good on one windfall

Galactic Genome Project:
2 VP / genes world (normal, windfall)
3 VP / Genectics Lab
Consume: 2 genes -> 3 VP

-*Probably* short- and middle term objectives, between 3 and 5 bonus points, face up from the beginning.
Some possible examples: 1st to get X military power, or the 1st to get a power on each phase.
Also, endgame bonus for those who have the most *something*.

-2nd expansion centered in the battle between the Empire and the Rebels
Imperium Seat: 6-point dev, can attack Rebel cards
Rebel Alliance: 6-point dev, can attack Imperium cards
If you don't have Imperium or Rebel cards, you can't be attacked.
edit: Wei-Hwa Huang said (in Comments) that "None of those three statements is completely accurate..." I'll take the blame, cause I needed to guess a bit here - but only here

- One expansion has around 30 cards, the other around 50.

- Solo rules, maybe drafting...

- When asked about the release date, he said that as far as he knows it's going to be "before summer", but the precise date is up to Rio Grande Games [but I don't know when the interview took place]


edit(s): formatting, wording, some more information

Last edited on 2008-04-22 03:01:07 CST (Total Number of Edits: 7)
Brendon Russell
New Zealand
Auckland
flag msg tools
patron0809
mbmbmbmb
Great scoop indeed!

le_el wrote:
-------------------------------
Improved Logistics: development, cost 3, 2 VP
Settle: May place a second military/non-military world (settle twice in one turn)
[He said that "it's gonna be hard to use it". I couldn't read the text on the card.]


It's hard to read, but I think the text on the card is something like this:

"Does not use any powers from the first world placed, do not draw a Settle bonus card for the second world"
Jonathan
United States
Orlando
Florida
flag msg tools
Avatar
04050607080910
mbmbmbmbmb
I'm glad to see some news on Gathering Storm. I'm most interested in those new starting worlds, as the original 5 get a bit dull after a while! 10 worlds in total will be a nice variety! Still no firm date though, right?
Last edited on 2008-04-20 08:49:58 CST (Total Number of Edits: 2)
Ross Moulden
United Kingdom

Leicestershire
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmb
Lots of explore power worlds out there it seems. Good news for Seti, that's going to make it one of the best 6 devs, I would have thought (it's pretty good already)

Doomed World would be good with Lost Ark Species World in the opening hand.

Damaged Alien factory's interesting. Alien military production is powerful, I suppose which is why you have to discard a card to produce.

Improved Logistics looks very nice for a military player especially. Would make for ineresting play in 2 player. Theoretically if develop/develop and settle/settle are called, 6 cards could be played in 1 turn :D

Terraforming gets fleshed out, I wonder if Uplift and Imperium will be as well, or if that's for the 2nd expansion.

I like the sound of short/mid term goals. Makes you have to think about things a bit more. Do you make the play that sets up your engine best for the long term, or sacrifice your development slightly in order to gain a few points in the short term? Hopefully it won't force people's play in one direction though, although I can't imagine it would with the amount of playtesting.

2nd Expansion sounds interesting too. I wonder how "attacking" is going to work.
BT Carpenter
United States
Reston
Virginia
flag msg tools
Avatar
patron070809
mbmbmb
Nice scoop! Hopefully this means they're on the fast track for the expansion.

I'm glad to see the 'discard a card to produce' mechanic introduced, I'd been batting an idea like that around, and now it may be possible to 'cost' it for other purposes.

A reduced starting hand for a gene windfall seems more than fair - and you can bet what the first move of THAT player will be.

Imperium/Rebel attacking sounds like "optional PvP" to me. There will be some players who simple refuse to play the cards which can be attacked - ever. I wonder how that will affect the game.

Terraforming Guild looks crazy for the military player who's perpetually stuck with a ton of windfalls.

Same for Improved Logistics - seems very geared towards the mlitary player.

So far I like what I see!
raaf
Finland
Helsinki
flag msg tools
Avatar
patron07
Luthrin wrote:

Terraforming gets fleshed out, I wonder if Uplift and Imperium will be as well, or if that's for the 2nd expansion.


Cyril Demaegd said that there will be some good cards for the genectic strategy in the 1st expansion, but that it will get real a boost in the 2nd. I imagine he's talking about, respectively, the Galactic Genome Project and the Uplift cards.

Luthrin wrote:

I like the sound of short/mid term goals. Makes you have to think about things a bit more. Do you make the play that sets up your engine best for the long term, or sacrifice your development slightly in order to gain a few points in the short term?


He said that the developers had this idea once the base game was already out, to address the "no interaction" complaints. I do like it, too.

Luthrin wrote:

Hopefully it won't force people's play in one direction though, although I can't imagine it would with the amount of playtesting.


According to him, you can also win by playing old-style :)

byronczimmer wrote:

Imperium/Rebel attacking sounds like "optional PvP" to me. There will be some players who simple refuse to play the cards which can be attacked - ever. I wonder how that will affect the game.


Another comment from him: the players can agree on whether they will play a "fighting" game or not. If they want a "normal" game, they only need to remove certain cards from the deck.
Last edited on 2008-04-20 02:46:18 CST (Total Number of Edits: 1)
Allan Clements
Norway
Oslo
flag msg tools
Avatar
patron080910
mbmbmbmbmb
sounds good. I like the idea of conflict being restricted to certain cards, so you can choose to take the risk of conflict, but can avoid it so long as you dont touch rebel/imperial cards.
James Palmer
Canada
Kitchener
Ontario
flag msg tools
Avatar
patron0809
mbmbmbmbmb
So how does attacking imperium / rebel cards actually work?
Chris J Davis
United Kingdom
London
flag msg tools
Avatar
patron080910
mbmbmbmbmb
Felkor wrote:
So how does attacking imperium / rebel cards actually work?


You'll have to wait at least another six months for the answer to that question. ;)
raaf
Finland
Helsinki
flag msg tools
Avatar
patron07
bleached_lizard wrote:
You'll have to wait at least another six months for the answer to that question. ;)


Unless we can, hmm, *persuade* Tom Lehmann or Wei-Hwa Huang to come over and drop a line...

How much GeekGold do you have left?

:)
Wei-Hwa Huang
United States
Mountain View
California
flag msg tools
Avatar
patron0407
mbmb
Quote:

Imperium Seat: 6-point dev, can attack Rebel cards
Rebel Alliance: 6-point dev, can attack Imperium cards
If you don't have Imperium or Rebel cards, you can't be attacked.


None of those three statements is completely accurate... ;-)
Wei-Hwa Huang
United States
Mountain View
California
flag msg tools
Avatar
patron0407
mbmb
Oh, it's also worth mentioning that the cards shown in the video are images from my prototype design; I was surprised to see those instead of the actual production cards.
Cameron "Frakking" McKenzie
United States
Cumming
Georgia
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Rebel and Imperium cards are vulnerable to attack, only if your opponent gets the proper development?
Doesn't seem so bad. If you draw and discard Rebel Alliance early on, you can feel confident that your imperium cards won't be attacked. At least for quite a while :-) The Rebel/Imperium "war" doesn't sound like something that will happen every game since you'd presumably have to be playing a military strategy AND end up with the right development. Sounds like an interesting mechanic, but I can't imagine it will be something too complicated.

These short term goals sound interesting though. I don't think they will define how you play, since if you draw a combo of really nice cards you'll want to play them regardless of whether they fulfill goals or not. If your cards don't synergize that well with each other, you may at least be able to grab a short-term goal with them even if you can't make an entire strategy out of it.

Compare to TtR where some players barely draw any tickets and just take the longest routes they can and occasionally block their rivals, and then the players that have a sprawling network of short routes that connect dozens of cities and complete several tickets... Yeah, the short term goals kind of reminded me of tickets.
Brian Wade
United States
Unspecified
Unspecified
flag msg tools
mb
30 cards? Is this right? The price seems a little steep for a 30 card expansion, IMHO.
Cameron "Frakking" McKenzie
United States
Cumming
Georgia
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Warpstorm wrote:
30 cards? Is this right? The price seems a little steep for a 30 card expansion, IMHO.


Your not just getting cards, and if I'm not mistaken this one is the 50 card expansion.
raaf
Finland
Helsinki
flag msg tools
Avatar
patron07
onigame wrote:
Quote:

Imperium Seat: 6-point dev, can attack Rebel cards
Rebel Alliance: 6-point dev, can attack Imperium cards
If you don't have Imperium or Rebel cards, you can't be attacked.


None of those three statements is completely accurate... ;-)


Are you sure you don't want to give us some completely accurate information?

ninja

I would thumb your post :p
Wei-Hwa Huang
United States
Mountain View
California
flag msg tools
Avatar
patron0407
mbmb
le_el wrote:

Are you sure you don't want to give us some completely accurate information?

ninja


I'm sure I want to, but I shouldn't.
Chris J Davis
United Kingdom
London
flag msg tools
Avatar
patron080910
mbmbmbmbmb
le_el wrote:
bleached_lizard wrote:
You'll have to wait at least another six months for the answer to that question. ;)


Unless we can, hmm, *persuade* Tom Lehmann or Wei-Hwa Huang to come over and drop a line...

How much GeekGold do you have left?

:)


Change I can barely dig out of my pocket. But I think it'd take more than Geek Gold to make that kind of persuasion...

Has anybody got any Monopoly money?
raaf
Finland
Helsinki
flag msg tools
Avatar
patron07
onigame wrote:

I'm sure I want to, but I shouldn't.


At least we can infer the rest is accurate... :what:
James Palmer
Canada
Kitchener
Ontario
flag msg tools
Avatar
patron0809
mbmbmbmbmb
I do have to wonder why so little information on the expansion has been revealed... by this time with the original game, we had lots of card examples and I think we may have even had the rules released for preview.

Are we going to keep getting a steady stream of info on this?
Philippe N
Luxembourg
Luxembourg
flag msg tools
Well, I think they should reprint a tuned down version of the Seti along with the extension...
Wei-Hwa Huang
United States
Mountain View
California
flag msg tools
Avatar
patron0407
mbmb
le_el wrote:
At least we can infer the rest is accurate...


Well, the rest is going to be in the first expansion, so you'll find out soon enough how accurate it is.

As a general rule of thumb, nothing is ever guaranteed to be accurate in these matters since things could always change at the last minute.

Phoxtrot wrote:
Well, I think they should reprint a tuned down version of the Seti along with the extension...


There's no reason to tune down SETI -- the SETI point ratio goes from
about 1.58 to 1.61; it's not really noticeable.

Chris Rudram
Canada
Victoria
flag msg tools
Avatar
patron07080910
mbmbmbmb
Felkor wrote:
I do have to wonder why so little information on the expansion has been revealed... by this time with the original game, we had lots of card examples and I think we may have even had the rules released for preview.

Are we going to keep getting a steady stream of info on this?


Why wonder? It'll come out and we'll get stuff. No need to pre-empt it's release.
Chris J Davis
United Kingdom
London
flag msg tools
Avatar
patron080910
mbmbmbmbmb
Odinsday wrote:
Felkor wrote:
I do have to wonder why so little information on the expansion has been revealed... by this time with the original game, we had lots of card examples and I think we may have even had the rules released for preview.

Are we going to keep getting a steady stream of info on this?


Why wonder? It'll come out and we'll get stuff. No need to pre-empt it's release.


We don't need. But we want.

Okay, maybe we need a little bit...
Stefan Lopuszanski
United States
North Wales
Pennsylvania
flag msg tools
Avatar
patron07080910
mbmbmb
Odinsday wrote:
Felkor wrote:
I do have to wonder why so little information on the expansion has been revealed... by this time with the original game, we had lots of card examples and I think we may have even had the rules released for preview.

Are we going to keep getting a steady stream of info on this?


Why wonder? It'll come out and we'll get stuff. No need to pre-empt it's release.


Well, if we know before hand we can "try them out" before we buy them.

I'm going to have a game with the new home worlds listed above and see how they work out.
1 , 2  Next »   | 
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | DMCA | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
BoardGameGeek and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.