Recommend
19 
 Thumb up
 Hide
3 Posts

Theophrastus» Forums » Reviews

Subject: User Review rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Greg Schloesser
United States
Talbott
Tennessee
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmbmb
The game is designed by P.R. Chase, a new-comer to the game design field. His wife has been somewhat active on the Spielfrieks games discussion board, promoting her hubby’s game. The name Theophrastus is derived from the middle-ages alchemist Theophrastus von Bombast der Hohenheim. ‘Theo’, as we called him for convenience, apparently won widespread acclaim as a healer using unconventional techniques. He is often considered the father of modern medicine.

Players represent alchemy students attempting to win the favor of Theo and become his apprentice. To do this, they must attempt to match the components Theo’s formulas as closely as possible. The player who successfully accomplishes this over the course of three formulas (rounds) will be named Theo’s apprentice and, according to the rules, is “destined for glory”. Although the game is quite good, I get the nagging feeling the theme will limit its popularity.

The assignments are divided into three classifications (A, B & C), with each category being more extensive than the previous one. An assignment describes the formula that Theo is brewing and lists how many of the three major categories of components (Metals, Elements and Essentials) that must be included in order for the formula to be completed. For instance, the ‘Erotic Philtre’ formula calls for:

Any 2 Metals
The ‘Fire’ Elemental
Any 5 Essentials

Just what particular components are required will be determined during the course of the round as players take turns playing components to Theo’s formula, as well as their own. The object is to play cards to your own formula that will match the components played to Theo’s formula as closely as possible.

As mentioned, the components are separated into three major classifications: Metals, Elements and Essentials. Each classification has several different ingredients. For example, in the Metals category, one will find lead, gold, silver, copper and the magical lodestone. Essentials include sulphur, nitre, mercury, vitriol and the mysterious aqua fortis (which we termed ‘aqua velva’!). Of course, the Elements include earth, wind, fire, water, air and the wondrous ether. Each ingredient has a point value ranging from 2 – 6, which will be tallied during the scoring round.

To begin the game, each player receives 5 ingredient cards, with the remainder being separated into five face-down stacks. An assignment from Theo’s ‘A’ category is revealed and a start player chosen. In a neat touch, the start player token is a small lead mortar & pestle.

The round begins with the start player drawing a card from one of the five stacks and then playing a card face-down to Theo’s formula. The card played MUST be played into the correct classification on Theo’s formula. If Theo’s formula already lists a specific ingredient, then there is no need to place that card into his formula. Players should try to place that ingredient in their own formula, however. Further, sometimes Theo’s formula will list a ‘forbidden’ ingredient, in which case players cannot play that ingredient into his formula and should attempt to avoid playing it into their own formula.

Then beginning with the player to the start player’s left, each player draws one card and has 3 action points to spend. The actions and their costs are:

Draw a card – 1 point.

Examine one stack of cards and take a card - 3 points

Advance your own formula (face-up) – 1 point. A player places a card from his hand face-up into the appropriate classification on his own player mat.

Advance your own formula (face-down) – 2 points. A player places a card from his hand face-down into the appropriate classification on his own player mat.

Advance Theo’s formula – 3 points. Place a card face-down into the appropriate classification on Theo’s formula.

Play a Lodestone, Ether or Aqua Fortis as a special action –1 point. See below for description of these cards and their abilities.

Play a Philosopher’s Stone – 1 point. Again, I’ll describe this below.

Reveal any face-down card in play – 2 points.

Secretly Look at any face-down card in play – 3 points.

Reveal any face-down card in your OWN experiment – 0 points.

Since ALL cards played into Theo’s experiment are initially played face-down, players must attempt to reveal or secretly peek at the face-down cards played into Theo’s formula by their opponents. Armed with this knowledge, you can better plan your own formula, attempting to match those cards in Theo’s formula. Of course, you should remember the cards that you play face-down into Theo’s formula so that you can play corresponding cards into your own formula.

But don’t worry – the game is not a ‘multi-player solitaire’ game. There are numerous things you can do to mess with the formulas of your opponents. Each classification has a ‘special’ card (lodestone, ether and aqua fortis) that can be used to tamper with your opponent’s formulas, or used as a ‘wild card’ to automatically match an ingredient in the appropriate classification in Theo’s formula. Here’s how you can be nasty with these cards:

You can play one of these cards into the formula of an opponent (or Theo!) and take a face-up card from the same classification from his formula into your hand. Thus, if he has a valuable ingredient that you know matches an ingredient in Theo’s formula, you can effectively ‘steal’ it from him. I guess students were deceitful even back in the middle ages!

Please note that you are not totally ‘hosing’ your opponent as the card you are placing into his formula is a ‘wild’ card and will score some points for him, but usually not as much as he would have scored if you hadn’t messed with him!

If your opponent has a face-down card in his formula, it is protected and cannot be tampered with. This is why it costs more to play a card face-down into your own formula than face-up. However, players can spend 2 action points to reveal any face-down card, so the protection is not foolproof.

The Philosopher’s stone is even more evil. This allows you to take a card from an opponent’s (or Theo’s) formula and replace it with ANY card of the same classification from your hand. Of course, you will usually be nasty and replace it with a ‘forbidden’ card, or at least a card that doesn’t match anything in Theo’s formula. There are also special Philosopher’s stones that allow you to discard ingredients from opponent’s (or your own) formula, steal a card from an opponent’s hand and reveal a face-down card.

Those Philosopher’s stones can be quite powerful … and nasty.

After a player has used all three of his action points, he must discard down to five cards, with the discarded cards being placed underneath any of the five stacks of cards. Again, it can be important to remember the stack(s) into which you discarded these cards if you later want to retrieve them.

Once all players have had their turn, the start player token rotates to the next player and the cycle continues with that player beginning the new round by playing a card to Theo’s formula. Then, all players take their turns and the cycle continues until Theo’s formula is completed (completely filled). At this point, the game enters the scoring round, with each player drawing one card and having one action point to spend. The only restriction during this scoring round, however, is that a player cannot alter the ingredients in Theo’s formula or discard a card from an opponent’s formula.

Once everyone has used their one action point, all ingredients are revealed and players score their formulas. For each card that matches an ingredient in Theo’s formula, it scores the number of points indicated on the card (2 – 6). If a player has an ingredient in his formula that doesn’t match one in Theo’s formula, he still scores 1 point … UNLESS it was a forbidden ingredient, in which case it scores zero points. Wild cards (lodestone, ether and aqua fortis) score 2 points each. Players record their total points and a new round begins.

At the conclusion of a round, players fill their hands to five cards and discard all cards played to their formulas and to Theo’s formula. These are shuffled with the draw piles and five new stacks are formed. A new formula is revealed (from the ‘B’ stack for round 2 and the ‘C’ stack for round 3) and a new round is held. After three rounds, the game concludes and the player with the most cumulative points is named Theo’s assistant.

Although luck of the draw is certainly a factor, the game is filled with choices and decisions on each and every turn. Also, a bad hand of cards is easily rectified as a player can spend a turn drawing three new cards and purge himself of unwanted cards. So, it is very unlikely a player will be saddled with a poor hand throughout a round.

The variety of actions allowed provide ample opportunity for clever play, allowing players to manipulate the situation in their favor or hinder the efforts of their opponents. Choosing which actions to execute and how best to use your action points are critical choices that have tremendous impact on the play of your opponents and the outcome of a round. I find the game very intriguing and fun to play. It somehow has a feel of Bazaar and Andy Merritt’s Too Many Cooks. I had the opportunity to play a few more times over the weekend and my appreciation of the game has continued to grow.

In our game, Jon struck out to an early lead and managed to hold onto that lead through the second round. Midway through the game most players began getting a good feel of how to manipulate the situation and how best to use the wild cards and Philosopher’s stones. Thus, the game took a nastier turn in the final round, with Jon being hammered. He scored the fewest points in that round, but he had built enough of a lead to hold the rest of us off.

Round-by-round scores:

Round 1: Jon 16, Michael 13, Jim 12, Greg 9, Geoff 6
Round 2: Jon 35, Jim 29, Greg 28, Michael 24, Geoff 21
Round 3: Jon 56, Greg 54, Jim 51, Michael 49, Geoff 42

Ratings: Jim 7, Greg 6.5, Geoff 6.5, Michael 6.5

10 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Cyn Norton
United States
Palo Alto
California
flag msg tools
Re:User Review
gschloesser (#3625),
This is such a nice, clear description of how this game is played! To learn how to play this game, read Article #3625 rather than the instructions that come with the game.
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Lisa M
United States
Pennsylvania
flag msg tools
Thanks so much for writing this review! I just started playing this game with a couple of friends. We really liked the concept, the card artwork, etc., but we found the included rules to be almost incomprehensible. We still need a few points clarified, but your description was extremely helpful!kiss
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.