The Hotness
Games|People|Company
Eclipse
Mage Knight: Board Game
Kairo
Agricola: Die Bauern und das liebe Vieh
Midnight Men
Rex: Final Days of an Empire
Wiz-War
Ora et Labora
Dixit 3
War of the Ring
The Lord of the Rings: The Card Game
Twilight Struggle
Hawaii
Dominion
Agricola
Kingdoms
7 Wonders
Agents of SMERSH
A Game of Thrones: The Board Game (second edition)
A Few Acres of Snow
Sherlock Holmes Consulting Detective
D-Day Dice
7 Wonders: Cities
Through the Ages: A Story of Civilization
1812: The Invasion of Canada
Le Havre
Arkham Horror
The Castles of Burgundy
Risk Legacy
Sid Meier's Civilization: The Board Game
Dungeon Petz
Twilight Imperium (third edition)
Race for the Galaxy
Dominant Species
Cosmic Encounter
Elder Sign
Mansions of Madness
Star Wars: Battle of Hoth
Serenissima
Star Trek: Fleet Captains
Puerto Rico
Battlestar Galactica
Barbarian Prince
Power Grid
Kingdom Builder
Nexus Ops
Super Dungeon Explore
Thunderstone Advance: Towers of Ruin
Evo
Core Worlds
Recommend
 
 Thumb up
 Thumb up
6 Posts

Here I Stand» Forums » Rules

Subject: Using debater's bonus for Ref. Attempts rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Denis Cobrousev
Russian Federation

mbmbmbmbmb
I have a number of Ref. attempts from some event. Have I to decide which debater's bonus use (or don't use any) before first attempt? Or I can resolve some attempts and then use a bonus for remaining ones?
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Ed Beach
United States
Unspecified
Unspecified
designer
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
You can pull in the debater's bonus at any time.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Greg Forster
United States
Oconomowoc
Wisconsin
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
What about Carlstadt? I had understood that you couldn't publish a treatise and roll your two attempts, then flip Carlstadt for a third. That would allow you to avoid putting unrest markers if you failed the first two tries - or else you'd have to put them down retroactively, but what if the unrest from the first attempt would have changed the situation for your second attempt?

So I'm assuming you mean that you can activate people who give you +1 die in the middle of the action, not people like Carlstadt whose power is supposed to affect the whole action.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Ed Beach
United States
Unspecified
Unspecified
designer
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Greg: Agreed. The same would be true of Cajetan or Calvin, since all of their attempts must be taken in the same language zone.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Greg Forster
United States
Oconomowoc
Wisconsin
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
That's great news, because on Sunday I stopped the Protestant from using Carlstadt retroactively, and I would hate to think I was wrong!

But after you said debater bonuses that grant extra dice can be used after the action has started, I didn't expect you'd say Cajetan and Calvin can't be used retroactively. If you did your first two in the same language zone, nothing's lost in terms of breaking rules by letting you flip them for a third one in the same zone.

Of course, it makes a difference because you might make different choices about which spaces to target if you knew in advance you'd committed to making three tries. So if that's the reason to ban using them in mid-action, fine. I'm just saying that if the rule is going to be "debater bonuses can be activated in mid-action as long as they don't have rules implications for reformation attempts that have already occurred," that wouldn't really impede the use of Cajetan or Calvin.

Not that I care either way, just asking.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Denis Cobrousev
Russian Federation

mbmbmbmbmb
Well, and what about Tetzel? May he be commited after resolving 1 attempt? Or even after 2 (i. e. all) attempts?
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.