The "Humans win and you must play a supercrisis" definitely sounds like too nice an agenda for a hostile one. Maybe there should be an added condition, like "pop under 3" (to stick to the "mutual annihilation" thing) or modify the secondary condition, like "you must play two successful supercrises" instead of "you must play a supercrisis".
I have the feeling that the ideal table is:
4 players: 2 humans, 1 Cylon, 1 Cylon leader with a friendly agenda
5 players: 3 humans, 2 Cylons.
6 Players: 3 humans, 2 Cylons, 1 Cylon leader with a friendly agenda
7 Players: 4 humans, 2 Cylons, 1 Cylon leader with a hostile agenda.
But if "Mutual Annihilation" is changed, maybe a Cylon leader with a hostile agenda will be ok... That's the only agenda card which seems really unbalanced to me.
Last edited on 2009-08-19 03:24:21 CST (Total Number of Edits: 1)