The Hotness
Games|People|Company
Eclipse
Gunship: First Strike!
Mage Knight: Board Game
Midnight Men
Agricola: Die Bauern und das liebe Vieh
Hawaii
Star Wars: Battle of Hoth
Wiz-War
Ora et Labora
Rex: Final Days of an Empire
Snowdonia
Barbarian Prince
The Lord of the Rings: The Card Game
Twilight Struggle
War of the Ring
Agricola
7 Wonders
A Game of Thrones: The Board Game (second edition)
Dominion
7 Wonders: Cities
Kingdoms
A Few Acres of Snow
Risk Legacy
Arkham Horror
Through the Ages: A Story of Civilization
Thunderstone Advance: Towers of Ruin
1812: The Invasion of Canada
Dixit 3
Elder Sign
D-Day Dice
The Castles of Burgundy
Le Havre
Kingdom Builder
Sid Meier's Civilization: The Board Game
Race for the Galaxy
Cosmic Encounter
Dominant Species
Dungeon Petz
Battlestar Galactica
Power Grid
Mansions of Madness
Last Will
Twilight Imperium (third edition)
Nexus Ops
Agents of SMERSH
Puerto Rico
Star Trek: Fleet Captains
Kairo
Core Worlds
Sherlock Holmes Consulting Detective
Recommend
5 
 Thumb up
 Thumb up
1 Posts

Pickomino» Forums » Reviews

Subject: Tao of Gaming Review rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Brian Bankler
United States
San Antonio
Texas
Modified Limited Rampage!
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Many Euros take three or four players. Sometimes two or five. Few play with six or more. There are many reasons (or at least, theories) as to why this is so, but I think one reason is that the games have a fixed amount of fun.

When Alhambra came out (two years ago), the reaction split — about half loved it, half hated it. How many people played often dictated the feeling. More players means less fun.

Usually, it's because you sit around during other players' turns. So the game takes the same amount of time, but you get to do less. The fun dilutes. These are 'fixed fun' games. Diplomacy doesn't dilute. Add or remove a player and you may change the balance (or variant), but each player gets the same amount of time to play.

This isn't a binary "Fixed vs non-fixed" choice; there's an elasticity of fun (as compared to number of players). In Puerto Rico, you lose control with players, but not as badly as Alhambra. Most games are in the middle, and designs that have fixed fun would be well advised to keep to lower limits.

Heckmeck im Bratwurmeck, Knizia's dice game, is a fixed fun game. I played it with four players, and loved it. You roll dice and keep all dice showing a single number, re-rolling the rest. But you can't keep a number you rolled before. Also, the dice show worms (as well as 1-5), and you need to keep at least one worm (valued at 5). If you have a value higher than the lowest available tile (which run 21-36), you can claim it. If you have the value equal to each player's most recently claimed tile, you steal it. If you crap out and have at least one tile, you return it (and sometimes remove the highest tile from the game). When no unclaimed tiles remain, you score (each tile shows 1-4 worms, which are points).

The reason I mention that it's a fixed fun game is that the box lists 2-7 players. Guess what you do when it's not your turn? Nothing. Ok, you watch dice tumble across the table. I'm surprised that anyone who played with six or seven liked the game. With seven, the game takes an hour (because one of the two 'timers' only functions when a player craps out and has a tile). But with 2-4, the game takes half as long, and each player gets more time with the dice.

It's a cute filler, nothing more. But I'd never dream of playing with a crowd.

[Since originally writing this, I've played several games two player. Needless to say, that's probably the best way to go. But even with a 3rd or fourth it's fine].
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Thumb up
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.