Surya's game blah blah

My initial impressions on games I recently played for the first time

1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5  Next »  [30]

Recommend
20 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide

Going Kiwi!

Surya Van Lierde is pure Eurosnoot and proud of it!
Belgium
Michelbeke
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Tomorrow we leave for the beautiful piece of land that's called New Zealand. We'll be visiting a number of areas, and wouldn't mind playing some games. If you know of/run a game group where Eurogames are the main dish, please let us know when and where you play, and we'll check if it fits into the schedule.

We'll probably be in the Auckland area somewhere between 4/1 and 7/1
We'll probably be in the Wellington area somewhere between 8/1 and 11/1
We'll also be visiting Queenstown and Dunedin after that
Our trip will conclude in Christchurch around 23/1 until 25/1
Twitter Facebook
5 Comments
Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:35 pm
Post Rolls
  • [+] Dice rolls
Recommend
30 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide

Keyper, Tybor der Baumeister and Lost Cities

Surya Van Lierde is pure Eurosnoot and proud of it!
Belgium
Michelbeke
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Keyper
tl;dr: yet another excellent game in the series

Man, Richard Breese always finds ways to cram new mechanisms into his games. Ways to do things differently from other games. But he does it in such a way that those unique elements don't call attention to themselves.
This is mostly a WP game where the color of your meeples affects the efficiency of your action. And other players can join you and then both players can benefit off of each other. Cool stuff that leads to interesting choices. Especially since every player gets to claim one of the action boards and with it all meeples (current and future) on it. Then it becomes a question of do I join in on the action I really want to do, or do I do it on an other board so I have access to the colors of meeples I want next round?
But not having a lot of meeples can be very nice as well as you get to reuse already placed meeples from yourself or (when you run out) other players.
All very interesting stuff. And that's all thrown into a game where you need to gather resources to convert into VPs because that's how games work of course.
But it's all very well done again (apart from the rule book apparently). The first game with 4 took a bit over 2 hours, but that's fine. It doesn't outstay it's welcome at all. It's engaging from start to finish.

Initial rating: 7.3/10
BGG scale: 8/10

Tybor der Baumeister
tl;dr: surprisingly effective

I've said it before and I've said it again: I love games where players get to use cards in different ways depending on what result they want to archive. In this game you can use cards as a way to get future discounts in one of the 4 resources, to score points or to use them as workforce for erecting buildings. And those buildings help you score more points of course. It combines this with a basic drafting mechanism that works very well as you're again not just looking at what you want but also what the next player(s) might want.
I'm not sure what the replay value for this game is, but it seems there are a number of strategies to explore.
I liked it.

Initial rating: 7/10
BGG scale: 7/10

Lost Cities
tl;dr: a classic for good reason

I played Keltis again not too long ago. I like it, but not nearly as much as this gem. Not only is the design cleaner, I also prefer the way there is more risk in starting a color, especially with the multiplier cards. Those just up the ante and add a lot of angst to the game. Will you get those higher cards? Or will you get the cards you're missing in the middle before you have to play the higher ones? Do you start drawing from the discard piles to slow down the game, or do you continue drawing from the draw pile, having a chance of drawing the cards you need?
Such simple rules, yet so many nice choices to make. Of course, there's a lot of luck involved, but that just adds to the excitement in this game. Some rounds are not fair as one player just has all the luck and the other has none, but that's fine.

Rating: 7.5/10
BGG scale: 8/10
Twitter Facebook
1 Comment
Tue Dec 26, 2017 3:44 pm
Post Rolls
  • [+] Dice rolls
Recommend
20 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide

Montana and Traders of Carthage

Surya Van Lierde is pure Eurosnoot and proud of it!
Belgium
Michelbeke
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Montana
tl;dr: solid

White Goblin Games got recognition pretty fast by teaming up with QWG and publishing lots of high quality games with good components in Dutch. Then they split up and each went their own way. They also started publishing more and more original titles. Those have been very hit and miss with me. Their highest rated game is Rattus. That is a good game, but it's not amazing. They also have a bunch of stinkers (Galapagos anyone?). So I'm always willing to give their games a shot, but I'm always weary that it might turn out to be complete rubbish. Of course, when a name like Rüdiger Dorn is on the box, I do have more hope.
Anyways....
This is kind of a WP game, but you don't need to place workers for all actions. Also, there is a good flexibility in placing them in case you don't have the colors you want/need.
You're essentially gathering resources and using those to claim terrain. The players who claim enough terrain (10 hexes) trigger the game end. There are some nice bonuses and a nifty auction mechanism thrown in for good measure. These things to elevate the game above your average gain-resources-score-points thing.
Oh yeah, the way you get new workers is by spinning a spinner, you know, like in all those shitty kids games. I didn't find this to be a big problem though. You can have good and bad luck with it of course, but the game gives you enough flexibility that this is not a game breaker.

Initial rating: 6.8/10
BGG scale: 7/10

Traders of Osaka
tl;dr: surprisingly effective

This definitely is one of those small, nifty games that are bigger then you expect them to be. It's a deck of cards, a tiny board and some markers. But the way you have to balance taking cards as money and buying the right goods at the right time to score the most points and not risk loosing what you've been gathering is just brilliant. Ever turn new, hard choices have to be made... unless you're out of money, and there's a 5 available.
Yeah, if you haven't played this and like short, small(ish) games with good amounts of strategy, definitely give this a shot.

Rating: 7.5/10
BGG scale: 8/10
Twitter Facebook
2 Comments
Fri Dec 22, 2017 11:28 am
Post Rolls
  • [+] Dice rolls
Recommend
23 
 Thumb up
5.00
 tip
 Hide

Merlin and Dragonsgate College

Surya Van Lierde is pure Eurosnoot and proud of it!
Belgium
Michelbeke
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Merlin
tl;dr: feels like a Feld

This is not a classic Feld point salad game, but it still has plenty of things that field very Feldian. For starters, you use dice to determine what actions you can take. The challenge here is: how do you puzzle the best path with what you roll? You have one pawn that you can move in one direction, and there is a shared pawn that can move in either direction to select actions. So the puzzle gets quite complex quite fast.
In essence you're trying to gather some resources and other things and position some pawns in certain locations to fulfill order cards. But the way the different elements do different things give you a lot of freedom of how you approach things.
Quite interesting.
Oh yeah, Feld didn't make this one by himself, but I think his stamp is most noticeable. But kudos to both designers for a solid game!

Initial rating: 7.3/10
BGG scale: 7/10

Dragonsgate College
tl;dr: but not original

Oh look, an other game where you select actions using dice. But like (almost) every game this one has a new twist. Some dice belong to players. If you use a die from an other player, that player gets to perform an action with the same value. So this already leads to interesting choices: do you take your own dice, not letting other players benefit from you taking their dice, or do you leave your dice for other people to take them so you can benefit? This also has to do with what amount of actions you will need. Having other players use yours, means you get more actions.
But on top of this solid mechanism, there is a game of course. You get some students (one time use) or teachers (every time use) to increase your skill level on three tracks to acquire tokens linked to those tracks. The different types of tokens help you in different ways and grant bonus income and points. There are also buildings. You want to build them because having unbuilt spaces will cost you points at the end. They also help you during the game. But they also cost you maintenance cost.
So there's a bunch of different intertwined mechanisms. It all works together quite well. A game worth exploring.
A point on the graphic design: not everyone will like the purple hue that is all over the game. It didn't bother me, but that's just taste. What will bother most players is that some information should have been represented by icons where there are none (like recurring income vs one time income on the buildings). Some icons look exactly like other things but work in different ways (like the student and teacher heads on the buildings). This should have been thought out better.

Initial rating: 6.9/10
BGG scale: 7/10
Twitter Facebook
0 Comments
Wed Dec 20, 2017 8:00 pm
Post Rolls
  • [+] Dice rolls
Recommend
32 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide

Rajas of the Ganges, Memo Dice and Le Havre The Inland Port

Surya Van Lierde is pure Eurosnoot and proud of it!
Belgium
Michelbeke
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Rajas of the Ganges
tl;dr quite good indeed

The Brands have been a bit hit-and-miss for me, but the last couple of years they've had more hits then before. And this game definitely is a hit.
This is a dice placement game. Certain actions require certain colors of dice, others requite certain values. So good die management is essential. But that's not just an interesting mechanism in a shell. No it's been integrated into a very good, tight game that appears to offer a good variety of different strategies to explore.
On top of that it has a rather unique scoring mechanism with 2 different makers moving in opposite directions. When they cross, the distance between them determines your score. But the way you move them (and witch one to move) is what the game is all about. Lots of choices!

Initial rating: 7.4/10
BGG scale: 7/10

Memo Dice
tl;dr: not that good

Roll dice, cover them up with cups and when all cups are placed or none can be placed, start guessing what is under the cups. Very, very basic. OK, this is a game aimed at families with kids. But the box says 8+, so it's not aimed at really young games. The main problem is: if the player starting has a good memory, the other players never get the opportunity to score. In our game we had a player like that, and he also happened to be the player who also got to start guessing. Well, let's just say the score was not close.
I think this is easily fixed: have players guess one die each. It would probably improve the game a bit, but this will never be a great game. It's just too basic and not that engaging.

Initial rating: 4/10
BGG scale: 3/10

Le Havre: The Inland Port
tl;dr: quite nice, but don't expect the full, juicy original

The original Le Havre is in my top 2 ever. It also happens to play very, very well with 2. So why a 2 player only take? Because it takes many of the mechanisms and discards many of them as well and distills it down into a more accessible, sorter game. You can still use each other's buildings of course, but it also adds a new aspect that doesn't appear in the original: the way resources are added and used is now the core of the game. And it leads to very hard choices. How to best combine the buildings to get the resources you need?
I never expected this to be the full Le Havre experience in a small box and it is not. But it is a solid little game with nice choices. Good stuff.

Rating: 7.2/10
BGG scale: 7/10
Twitter Facebook
4 Comments
Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:22 am
Post Rolls
  • [+] Dice rolls
Recommend
21 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide

Majesty: For the Realm and FUSE

Surya Van Lierde is pure Eurosnoot and proud of it!
Belgium
Michelbeke
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Majesty: For the Realm
tl;dr: the next Splendor/Century: Spice Road

I played a card game where you strategically use cards and gain plastic, over produced chips. It plays quite fast and has easy, well developed rules. But enough about Splendor... Boom goes the dynamite!
Anyhow, I can see why people are comparing this to Splendor and Century. It's a similar complexity and play time. It's all about using a limited amount of variables but combining them in such a way the players get meaningful choices and a number of different strategies to explore.
I'm not sure how huge the replay value is, but this certainly is a fun game that is easy to get to the table.

Initial rating: 7/10
BGG scale: 7/10

FUSE
tl;dr: fun challenge

This is a real time co-op game. Not my favorite genre. At all.
Dice are rolled, and each player grabs one of them and tries to play them on one of their cards, matching that card's requirements (certain colors, values, orders...) Dice that can't be used are bad news as it might lead to dice loss for all players. What you're trying to do is complete enough cards before time runs out.
There also are some random cards that hurt all players, but there's a fixed amount of those so once you run out you'll feel relief.
We had to play 3 or 4 games to squeeze out a victory. You get a score regardless, but making it to the end means you'll score a significant amount of bonus points.
This game is quite light and chaotic, but I think it's a fun challenge and the strict time limit makes sure the game doesn't outstay it's welcome.

Initial rating: 6.7/10
BGG scale: 6/10
Twitter Facebook
1 Comment
Mon Dec 18, 2017 3:08 pm
Post Rolls
  • [+] Dice rolls
Recommend
27 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide

Gaia Project and Byzanz

Surya Van Lierde is pure Eurosnoot and proud of it!
Belgium
Michelbeke
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Gaia Project
tl;dr: the same, but different

Yeah, I know, everyone is asking how different this game is to Terra Mystica. I had the same question. A lot of it is very similar. But some things are significantly different. The 4 temple tracks are gone, and replaced with 6 technology tracks that give you benefits that are not to be ignored. The question is which ones to invest on.
An other big thing is that there is A LOT more 'water' in this game, and that changes the game in a way that should not be underestimated. Most races can do pretty well in Terra Mystica without ever investing in ships. In this game that will be hard to pull off.
An other big change is that there now are ways to gain extra purple disks that can enter the game in specific ways.
Oh, and there's more changes: you can not partially terraform. There are no tiles to do so, so you just pay the entire cost in one go and plop down your building.
And of course there's the Gaia Project part of the game: a new type of 'landscape' (planet) that doesn't 'belong' to any race that has to be terraformed with a new type of resource.
So you see, there's quite a few changes, most of them quite interesting and well integrated into the system we know and love.
Is this game (not) as good/better? I don't know. I really like the new elements a lot. One play is not enough to say, but they might help me enjoy this more. But it certainly is a very good game. Maybe better, but probably as good.
Do you need to own both? Dunno, that's for you to decide. I don't know yet, after one play.
One point on the components: I understand why they went with plastic bits for the buildings and such, but why oh why are the cubes and cylinders also in (ugly shiny) plastic? For this price they could have made those from some nice wood, as it should be.

Initial rating: 8/10
BGG scale: 8/10

Byzanz
tl;dr: ok card game

This is a hand management game. What cards to play to gain what cards? When to play cards, when to score cards... it all works pretty well and has some interesting choices. However, while I wouldn't mind playing again, I wasn't that taken by it. Maybe this is one of those games that gets better if everyone really knows the game well.
All in all I would say this is a pretty OK card game worth trying.

Initial rating: 6.3/10
BGG scale: 6/10
Twitter Facebook
2 Comments
Thu Dec 14, 2017 3:19 pm
Post Rolls
  • [+] Dice rolls
Recommend
12 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide

I'm always up to try any game...

Surya Van Lierde is pure Eurosnoot and proud of it!
Belgium
Michelbeke
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
The last 2 days we had a hackathon at work. There were five teams working on projects they came up themselves. We came in as second. And for that we got a nice gift... A game that is quite popular and that I haven't played yet! I'm not sure it's my type of game, but I'm always up to try any game
Twitter Facebook
3 Comments
Thu Dec 14, 2017 9:03 am
Post Rolls
  • [+] Dice rolls
Recommend
28 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide

Reworld, TAGIRON and King Chocolate

Surya Van Lierde is pure Eurosnoot and proud of it!
Belgium
Michelbeke
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Reworld
tl;dr: interesting planning game

This game is all about planning and timing! What cards do you use to acquire what tiles when. The order in which you acquire them, impacts the order in which you get to play them during the final phase. So constantly you're puzzling together possible combinations for an efficient last phase. Good planning will be rewarded not only with good points, but also bonus points for doing certain things before anyone else.
This game can probably be very AP inducing for certain types of players. My group didn't suffer from that and the game played quite quickly. The result was that all of us quite enjoyed this.
With the variety of tiles, I also look forward to trying a number of different strategies.

Initial rating: 7/10
BGG scale: 7/10

TAGIRON
tl;dr: Code 777 where you don't guess your own code

In this game you're trying to guess a 5 digit code and it's colors. To do so you ask Code 777 style questions. The difference is: everyone answers them and you're not guessing your own code. With two players you guess each other's code, with 3 you guess the code that's on the table. The questions are quite hard to combine to get to a good result though, so this game poses a very good challenge. I quite enjoyed it!

Initial rating: 7/10
BGG scale: 7/10

King Chocolate
tl;dr: average tile laying game

Lay some tiles, claim some fields, upgrade some resources and get money. Very basic stuff. A bit too basic if you ask me. Yes, there can be some competition for certain resources or space on the board, but I just didn't find this engaging.
The second time I played I decided to nor rely on other players and just build my own chain. At the end of my chain I would be giving resources to other players for them to score. I didn't care, by that time I had already scored them 4 times! I won big. Now I'm not saying this is a guaranteed win, but I just never felt like the game challenged me. Every turn you score as much as possible, or set yourself up for a good next turn.
Also, this game has a weird rule. It has a rule that if you start your turn without a tile, you take 2 and play one, keep one. It also tells you that if you have no tiles after placing one, you HAVE to use an action to take one. Weird!
In any case... I found this game works. It's not annoying but maybe a tad long and not very engaging and there aren't a ton of strategies to explore.

Initial rating: 6/10
BGG scale: 5/10
Twitter Facebook
0 Comments
Wed Nov 29, 2017 12:44 pm
Post Rolls
  • [+] Dice rolls
Recommend
29 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide

Sentient, Cat Lady and Dominion

Surya Van Lierde is pure Eurosnoot and proud of it!
Belgium
Michelbeke
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Sentient
tl;dr: nice but overproduced/priced

These days every publisher needs to make sure their artwork and components are good. That is good as we are now getting lots of very good games that are very well produced. More than ever before. We are, unfortunately, also getting a lot of mediocre and shitty games with great art and components. Sometimes it even looks like they are just throwing those aspects at a design just to sell us a box of stuff with very little game. But that aside, it seems like there are more and more games where the publisher takes the 'nice bits' thing a bit too far. Just think of that useless huge 3D cardboard stand in Agra. This game also has this issue. It has oversized cards even though regular size cards would have been more than big enough and still have plenty of space for art. It also has these nice custom dice that are just regular D6es with some design elements added. The result is that this game costs a whopping $55 MSRP and that is just WAY too much for a deck of cards and some tokens and dice. This game scratches a similar itch as Capital Lux for me and that game set me back €15. Now granted, that game does not have dice, so it will always be cheaper than this one, but the difference is staggering!
OK, end of rant (for now). How is the game?
Well, as I said: this kind of scratches the same itch as Capital Lux. It's equally abstract with a futuristic theme pasted on. It also features cards that modify stuff, though that happens in a very different way. But it's a nice puzzle to optimize your score during the round and setting yourself up for good end game scoring. It's a nice game. It's not a $55 big box strategy game.

Initial rating: 7/10
BGG scale: 7/10

Cat Lady
tl;dr: very light and forgettable, but enjoyable

Cat ladies get as many cats as possible. So that's what you do in this game. Of course cats need to eat, so you also get food. Just having players grab cats and food, so some special cards are added to spice things up. This allows players to try scoring in a few different ways, especially with the stray cats. It's all quite nice and easy. It's quite enjoyable. It's also quite forgettable. But if you have a copy, I'm sure you'll play it a couple of times. But don't expect me to invest in a copy for myself.

Initial rating: 6/10
BGG scale: 6/10

Dominion
tl;dr: holds up

I've never been one to go all in on Dominion. I like the concept, but I also felt like it was something that would be enjoyed best when not played to death. I also never got any other boxes but the base set. I don't play it a lot, but I recently got to play it again after a 7 year period of not playing it. And it still holds up. The base mechanism is just so rock solid it's not surprising it has been copied so many times. With all the variety of cards in the base set, there is already a lot of play value there, and I don't need to own every single card available.
I'm personally not a fan of the attack cards, I feel like most of them just make the game longer and this game is best when it takes about 30 to 45 minutes.
I will be enjoying this game for years to come, just very sparingly

Rating: 7.5/10
BGG scale: 7/10
Twitter Facebook
5 Comments
Tue Nov 28, 2017 9:13 am
Post Rolls
  • [+] Dice rolls

1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5  Next »  [30]

Subscribe

Categories

Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.