Recommend
31 
 Thumb up
 Hide
19 Posts

Attack!» Forums » Reviews

Subject: I Hate Errant Punctuation rss

Your Tags: Add tags
Popular Tags: [View All]
Matt Drake
United States
Arlington
Texas
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmb
As a writer (an amateur, of course, and a total hack, but still a writer), I have a pretty serious grammatical complaint. This may not bother a lot of people, but it bothers me, because it poses difficulties if I have any intent to adhere to the rules of the written language. The complaint I have is about punctuation. Specifically, my complaint is with games whose titles end in an exclamation mark.

No matter how good a game might be, it makes it more difficult to review when I have to insert an exclamation halfway through a sentence. Plus, if you're writing in Word, the software will usually auto-correct and capitalize the first word following the erroneous punctuation, which makes more work for me, unless I choose to let it just roll on with the 'repaired' sentence the way it is. Consider, for example, this following sentence:

Playing Attack! Is a lot like playing Risk, but completely different.

See how that got turned into two sentences? What the heck kind of sentence is 'Playing Attack!'? And furthermore, what if I want to put a comma after the exclamation mark, or even worse, a different form of punctuation? And what if the name of the game ends a sentence, but I didn't feel like shouting? Example:

Attack!, one of the big ol' board games from now-semi-defunct publisher Eagle Games, is a world domination game where players attempt to take over the world. Only in Attack!, you're not going to end up playing for eight hours while you try to eliminate every other player, because the game ends as soon as one player is out. It goes faster than Risk, and has more depth, so if you like Risk, how could you not love Attack!?


See how awkward that was? That last question reads like something a comic-book villain might yell - "where are you, Batman?!?!?!" It's clumsy. And it only gets worse when you explain rules. For instance:

In Attack!, players each start with just four regions, and must expand through diplomatic and military means. Most of the board is wide open, but when you launch an offensive against a neutral area, you draw a card to see what kinds of troops you must defeat. It is often more strategic to attempt to gain the province through diplomatic means - but this could result in you losing the area to another player. But then, that player will only have one lone infantry to protect the new region, which means you could probably overrun it, so a strategy develops where you force opponents to grab up a region just so that you can hit it when it's weak. The strategy in Attack! is quite deep, and includes even more options that make it a very cerebral game.

OK, that paragraph was easier, because I only listed the game twice. Of course, that means there were two sentences that were completely hosed, but it also meant I got most of a paragraph without the offending punctuation. So I must continue, if I hope to illustrate the clumsy nature of the misplaced exclamation:

The feature that best sets Attack! apart from other global warfare games is the fact that you can only take three actions on your turn. In Risk, you can attack over and over, but in Attack!, you may only perform each action once (except for diplomatic attempts, which are incredibly likely to fail anyway). You can move troops, engage in a battle, then blitz with your tanks and planes - and then you've taken two actions, and just have one more. Buying troops isn't automatic, either - you have to use an action for that, and instead of just counting up regions, you count up the points on the cards you get for grabbing land. This means that you have to really plan your entire move before your turn even starts - an element that I like to see in any game, and which is used exceptionally well in Attack!.

Now that period just looks lost, but what can I do? Sound like I'm yelling? That doesn't make any sense. But my only other option is irrational, redundant punctuation. What's a crappy writer to do? I could try just leaving out the name of the game, like so:

In addition to the normal land-based actions, players may also battle for control of the seas. As an action, players may initiate naval battles using cards that represent their ships, and a regular ol' pair of dice. A little dice-off/match-up lets both players decide quickly who will control the ocean, and controlling the ocean is a potentially huge ability. If you can control the seas, you can stop other players from crossing. This can keep them from coming after you - but it can also keep them from picking on easy targets, thus keeping you in a position to dominate. Not much time will typically be devoted to naval battles, but when they happen, they're usually very important.

So that works, but sooner or later, I'm going to have to mention what I'm reviewing. So rather than just mention it once and then say, 'the game' throughout the rest of the review, I'll try putting the name at the end of the sentence:

There is an incredible amount of strategy and tactical maneuvering in Attack! Building the right army, targeting the right country, and forming the right alliances can be critical to winning Attack!


That works because it doesn't really matter whether or not I yell. I mean, it's kind of dumb to yell those sentences, but what the heck. It's just a game review. Faulkner I'm not. So I'll close with this last attempt to make this work:

In short, fans of large-scale tactical games - and even a few Eurogamers who like to blow stuff up - will enjoy playing Attack!

Summary

Pros:
Difficult decision-making
Clever long-term strategy
Interesting tactical options
Fun art, neat pieces and pretty cards

Cons:
Can plod a little bit - turns can take five to ten minutes, which is rough with five players
Quite a bit of luck
That damned exclamation mark
17 
 Thumb up
1.00
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Stven Carlberg
United States
Decatur
Georgia
flag msg tools
designer
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Yeah, well, "Word" is a piece of crap. Any word processing program that refuses to take instructions should be taken out and shot, either full of exclamation points or holes.
6 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
T. Nomad
Netherlands
Den Bosch
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
I would have got away with it too, if it weren't for that damned exclamation mark!

Great review.
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Richard Young
Canada
Victoria
BC
flag msg tools
Old Ways Are Best!
badge
Check Six!
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Cute! Clever use of a gimmick to attract attention to your review!

But the effort you had to expend to make your grammatic criticism "work" (convoluted sentence structure along with overuse of the poor comma) made following your discussion more difficult than necessary thus denying the thumb I might have otherwise have awarded it. I was left wondering if you were more interested in scoring cleverness points than providing a straight-forward review of the game...

My view of effective writing is to have the subject stand out by making the writer transparent, rather than the other way around. But it may depend what the real "subject" of the piece is.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Matt Drake
United States
Arlington
Texas
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmb
I did mention I was a crappy hack writer, right? I mean, that was right there in the review.
8 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
United States
Collegeville
Pennsylvania
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Bubslug wrote:
Cute! Clever use of a gimmick to attract attention to your review!

But the effort you had to expend to make your grammatic criticism "work" (convoluted sentence structure along with overuse of the poor comma) made following your discussion more difficult than necessary thus denying the thumb I might have otherwise have awarded it. I was left wondering if you were more interested in scoring cleverness points than providing a straight-forward review of the game...

My view of effective writing is to have the subject stand out by making the writer transparent, rather than the other way around. But it may depend what the real "subject" of the piece is.


Man, you seem really worked up about this. Have a cookie - you'll feel better.
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Goddammit! Quality and on time delivery are not mutually exclusive!
United States
Shelby Township
Michigan
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Bubslug wrote:

But the effort you had to expend to make your grammatic criticism "work" (convoluted sentence structure along with overuse of the poor comma) made following your discussion more difficult than necessary thus denying the thumb I might have otherwise have awarded it.


Somehow I think Matt will manage without the thumb
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Justin K
United States
Pennsylvania
flag msg tools
mbmbmb
"Attack!" is the name of the game. "!" is included in the title. Makes perfect sense when you look at it that way.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Matt Drake
United States
Arlington
Texas
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmb
You must be a riot at parties.
5 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Jon Grey
United States
Los Angeles
California
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Bubslug wrote:
Cute! Clever use of a gimmick to attract attention to your review!

But the effort you had to expend to make your grammatic criticism "work" (convoluted sentence structure along with overuse of the poor comma) made following your discussion more difficult than necessary thus denying the thumb I might have otherwise have awarded it. I was left wondering if you were more interested in scoring cleverness points than providing a straight-forward review of the game...

My view of effective writing is to have the subject stand out by making the writer transparent, rather than the other way around. But it may depend what the real "subject" of the piece is.


To hell with straight-forward reviews, we've got 8 others on Attack! that fulfill that role.

thumbsup for the creative writing OP. Even though I personally prefer a "straight-forward" review for purchase decisions; I am still appreciative of your linguistic enthusiasm.
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Matt Rice
Spain
Madrid
Madrid
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmbmb

HI!

A 'thumb' from a Teacher of English in Spain!

Well done, old chap...!

(You may go to the top of the class!)
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Kevin Garnica
United States
West Covina
California
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb


But the effort you had to expend to make your grammatic criticism "work" (convoluted sentence structure along with overuse of the poor comma) made following your discussion more difficult than necessary thus denying the thumb I might have otherwise have awarded it.
[/q]

You do realize that you just demonstrated poor grammar by using the word "have" twice, unnecessarily, right?
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Richard Young
Canada
Victoria
BC
flag msg tools
Old Ways Are Best!
badge
Check Six!
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Yes, there was a movement to expunge the "passive voice" there for a while; but, I think they've pretty much given up on it.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Brian Stephens
Australia
Mt Martha
Victoria
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmbmb
Matt, you obviously need practice with Word.

Why not try reviewing:
Ambush!
Ambush! - Move Out (This gives you a hyphen to play with as well!)
Ambush! - Purple Heart
Ambush! - Silver star
Destination Paris!
Sorry!



As a pendant I enjoyed your review.
 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Brian Stephens
Australia
Mt Martha
Victoria
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmbmb
Errant also means straying from accepted standards.

Tricky language English, isn't it!
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
sunday silence
United States
Maryland
flag msg tools
My problem was/is with the misuse of the term literally:

"Last night Camden Yards was literally exploding with Home runs..."

Errh, no it wasnt.

"In his days at Georgia, Herschel Walker literally ran himself into the headlines.."

NO he didnt.

"This week is literally do or die for the Terrapins.."

No, it's not.
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Brian Schroth
United States
Middletown
Connecticut
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmb
Uh...you can just refer to it as "Attack" without the exclamation mark. Problem solved.
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.