"L'état, c'est moi."
Canada
Vancouver
BC
flag msg tools
admin
designer
Roger's Reviews: check out my reviews page, right here on BGG!
badge
Caution: May contain wargame like substance
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb


Commands & Colors: Napoleonics
A game for 2 players designed by Richard Borg


"There are but two powers in the world, the sword and the mind. In the long run the sword is always beaten by the mind." - Napoleon Bonaparte

Introduction

Hello and welcome to the latest edition of Roger's Reviews. I've been playing board games since I was a wee lad and wargames for over thirty years. I've long been a fan of Richard Borg's engaging and easy to absorb commands and colors system. Of the games that use the same or at least very similar core mechanics I've also played Battle Cry, Memoir '44 and Battlelore.

Commands & Colors: Napoleonics (C&C:N) is a tactical battlefield game pitting two players against one another in a Napoleonic setting. As with other games in this series, hand management is key to your success. Good tactics and the occasional lucky die roll don't hurt either!

Components
Commands & Colors: Napoleonics comes in the 3" deep GMT box and it is simply packed with components.The box weighs a little over 4.5lbs in no small part due to the large number of wooden blocks that come with the game.

Blocks blocks blocks!

Complementing the nice wooden blocks is a beautiful green mounted map board with the name of the game in the centre of the map. I'm used to seeing the name of the game on a wargame map, but it is a little unusual to see it so centrally placed here. It immediately made me think of various indoor sport leagues having the team's logo in the centre of the playing area. No need to fret though, it doesn't detract at all from playing the game, and it'll often be covered by terrain tiles anyways.

The battle arena!

Speaking of terrain tiles, the base game comes with 56 double sided terrain tiles showing everything from forests to rivers to be used in the fifteen scenarios that come in the playbook. There is also a deck of 70 cards with the various commands you'll be able to use in your quest for victory, 8 dice, rules, the aforementioned scenario playbook, various player aids and many many sheets of stickers. I admit up front that having terrain tiles rather than separate scenario maps both allows for the very nice mounted map board and ability to create your own scenarios (if you're so inclined) as well as reducing costs for artwork and separate maps. However, I find having to sort and place terrain tiles on the map somewhat of a nuisance; this is one of those uncommon instances where I would actually have preferred individual paper scenario maps like in the Combat Commander series.

The box is packed full of Napoleonic gaming goodness!

Here's a key difference between the other games in the Borg family and the Commands & Colors (C&C) series (either Ancients or Napoleonics). Whereas Battle Cry et al have plastic miniatures to represent the units, the two C&C series use wooden blocks which require a sticker on both sides (as they'll be upright and visible to both players). The resultant armies are lovely to look at, in many ways easier to sort and store than miniatures, but be prepared my friends to spend literally hours getting your armies all set up. The dice are likewise blank and you have to put stickers on the six faces. There is a guide in the rule book on how to distribute these stickers for those who want specific guidance.

A note about the blocks and stickers: be prepared to devote several hours of painstaking effort to get all your blocks finished on both sides. It took me around four hours to get it all done.

Sorting blocks by color.

The first stickers are applied!

The French army begins its rassemblement.

Progress!

The French army is complete!

Of course, it's not strictly necessary to do all your blocks. You could use one block of each type and sufficient blank blocks to fill the units strength. You could also lay them flat which would only require stickers on one side. So, if you're keen to get playing sooner rather than later, you can use this handy shortcut. Just don't expect that you won't have to eventually get all your blocks finished.

On the right, two alternatives to putting stickers on everything.

The dice need to have stickers applied too.

A note of caution. that once you get all those stickers on their blocks and the terrain tiles punched out you'll have a Tetris-like challenge getting everything back into the box. Many people resort to external storage solutions for the C&C sets. For instance, my friend Jonathan stores his complete C&C Ancients series in a large Plano tackle box, with all the various armies sorted by type in their own compartments. The organizational effort is well worth it and will pay off time and again for setting up a game.

Everything in ziploc baggies. It all fits though!

I see that my future will probably have some Plano storage boxes in it but for the interim, until the expansions all arrive and the organization of the pieces becomes an issue, I'll stick with ziploc bags as they're cheap and everything fits (just!) in the box.

Rules & Game Play

The commands and colors family of games share in common the classic igo-ugo sequence of play. I'll speak about scenarios in a moment, but the gist is that you have a board that's split into three sections representing the left, centre, and right, and you will have units placed in each of these zones. You will also have cards that let you move your units. Some simple examples:

Command cards.

On your turn, you will play one card, select the units you want to move and move them, and then attack with eligible units. Then your opponent goes through the same sequence. This continues until someone wins.

There are essentially three different unit types in the game. Artillery, cavalry, and infantry. Artillery, as one might expect, has good ranged attack and poor mobility, cavalry has good mobility, and infantry has the advantage of being available in great quantity and because they usually have 4 blocks per unit are harder to kill. The game introduces variability in the mix by having unit differentiation within each army. For instance, in the French army alone there are 13 different unit types: 6 different kinds of infantry, 4 kinds of cavalry, and 3 kinds of artillery. To identify unit types at a glance, a color bar is on the bottom of each sticker - blue for infantry, yellow for cavalry and red for artillery. In addition to the three base types of units, each nationality has (generic) leaders that confer bonuses to the unit they're attached with. In addition to these subtypes, it's important to note that light and heavy units respectively have different capabilities in firepower and movement. This is all very nicely detailed in the player handouts. Keeping track of who's who on the board is not terribly hard, but does bear watching! You might want to move your artillery unit and fire it, but foot artillery can only more or fire, while horse artillery can do both.

Combat is quite simple. An eligible unit rolls dice and for every hit, the opponent removes one block from the unit being attacked. Once you've killed the last block in a unit, you get a victory banner. Rolling a flag on a die causes any surviving units to retreat. (I'm perforce oversimplifying for the sake of not getting into a long rules review, but that's the gist of it).

What differentiates C&C:N from the other games in the family is the addition of cavalry mobility ("Cavalry Retire and Reform") and infantry squares. When attacking a unit of infantry with cavalry, before you roll you have to ask if your opponent is going to go into a square. If yes, you randomly take a command card from their hand and place it on a special tableau and an infantry square marker is placed. Infantry in square formation gets a free die to try and bounce the cavalry, and only battles with one die, but the cavalry unit is also limited to one die. Similarly, before attacking cavalry with infantry, you must ask your opponent if they wish to retire and reform. If yes, then the cavalry unit withdraws 2 hexes and is safe from attack this round.

French Guard Cavalry attacks infantry unit going into square.

In each scenario victory is determined by winning a certain number of victory banners. You win a victory banner each time you eliminate an opposing unit, and in some scenarios occupying a certain space on the map counts towards you victory banner total for as long as you hold it. Victory is instant - once you have your final one, you win!

The base game comes with fifteen scenarios, and enterprising players could contrive their own. GMT has already announced the Commands & Colors: Napoleonics Expansion #1 – The Spanish Army expansion, and the rules indicate that there will be an future volumes to provide both La Grande Battle (sic) scenarios as well as a LGB command deck.

Conclusions
The games of the commands and colors series are intended to be light, fast, and fun and for the most part they all deliver. Between Avalon Hill, Days of Wonder (Memoir '44 and formerly Battlelore), Fantasy Flight (current publishers of Memoir '44, and now Battlelore) and GMT (Commands & Colors: Ancients, and now this), you have a broad range of styles and eras to choose from. If you're looking for more a more realistic portrayal, then you're better off looking for a specific wargame that suits your style as verisimilitude is not a forte of the series.

C&C:N builds on the strength of the commands and colors franchise, so many players will arrive to this game already knowing the basics of how to play. Learning the nuances and details of this system will be fun for most experienced players and easy for new players. As much as I've enjoyed Memoir '44 et al., I've always been more in the camp of these games being light entertainment. However, for me C&C:N stands somewhat apart from its counterparts in this regard. I feel that where this game really shines is that the infantry square/cavalry reform rules provide the flavor of the period better than its cousins.

As much fun as I've had with the commands and colors system to date, Commands & Colors: Napolelonics is my favorite by far. I'll be playing many games of this, and I'm already looking forward to the expansions.
  • [+] Dice rolls
Andrew Korson
United States
Kennewick
Washington
flag msg tools
designer
badge
Never trust the brute-force power of a computer network to do the job of a combinatorialist.
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
leroy43 wrote:
Fantasy Flight (current publishers of Memoir '44, Battlelore and Battle of Westeros)


Days of Wonder is still publishing Memoir '44. Only BattleLore transerred to Fantasy Flight.

And I think most people would say that Battles of Westeros is not a C&C game. Sure, it says 'A Battlelore Game' on the box, but it has nothing to do with Battlelore, and it doesn't use the C&C engine.
13 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Dan
United States
San Francisco
California
flag msg tools
badge
I must think over my position and how I may improve it.
Avatar
mb
Quote:
However, I find having to sort and place terrain tiles on the map somewhat of a nuisance; this is one of those uncommon instances where I would actually have preferred individual paper scenario maps like in the Combat Commander series.
Here, here. The maps would give the game so much more character.

Can I get you to expand on why you prefer this to the Ancients system? I take it you may prefer the time period and that there are more varied units. To me it looks like more of the same, which is why I plan on only owning Ancients (and the expansions that deal with battles I'm interested in). I'm very much in the minority in this, I know
8 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Colin Hunter
New Zealand
Auckland
flag msg tools
badge
Stop the admins removing history from the Wargaming forum.
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
I'm interested too in why you like C&C:N better than C&C:A. I don't personally, but they are close enough, that I like both (plus C&C:N looks awesome). I wonder if I am missing something in C&C:N. Great review.
6 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Kevin Duke
United States
Wynne
Arkansas
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
I realize it may "look like more of the same," but I was surprised at how much differently CCN plays than CCA.

I very much like CCA and, tho I am interested in the Nap period (and far more than I ever cared about ancients) my initial thought to CCN was, "how could it be much different and why play that instead of just sitting up more CCA?"

Well, it's VERY different. It "feels" a lot different in playing. There are different kinds of strategy and tactics involved. Games are taking longer to play (that is neither good nor bad, just different) and we're less keen/able to play 4 or 5 scenarios at a single sitting like we were/are with CCA. But we are equally keen on playing CCN for an entire evening and then looking for the next time we can play again.

The interactions work much differently. The mind-set of the players needs to be different as well.

Unlike the OP, I'm not ready to say I like CCN "better" than CCA, (and I won't know that for a long time) but I grant CCN is a VERY good game and much more of a different experience than I expected it to be. I'm certainly glad I have it.
23 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
"L'état, c'est moi."
Canada
Vancouver
BC
flag msg tools
admin
designer
Roger's Reviews: check out my reviews page, right here on BGG!
badge
Caution: May contain wargame like substance
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
oeolycus wrote:
Can I get you to expand on why you prefer this to the Ancients system? I take it you may prefer the time period and that there are more varied units. To me it looks like more of the same, which is why I plan on only owning Ancients (and the expansions that deal with battles I'm interested in). I'm very much in the minority in this, I know

It's as simple as me liking the era better. I think CC:A is an awesome system and seeing my friend Jonathan's complete set all nicely sorted in a Plano tackle box makes me slightly envious (though not as envious as I am about his Geekchiq table).

Era aside, the three things that I really like are the cavalry regroup, the infantry going into square formation, and the fact your units get weaker as they lose blocks.

C&CA and C&CN are both great systems, and saying I like one better than the other is akin to saying I like pistachio ice cream better than strawberry.
10 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
BrentS
Australia
Sydney
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
oeolycus wrote:


Can I get you to expand on why you prefer this to the Ancients system? I take it you may prefer the time period and that there are more varied units. To me it looks like more of the same, which is why I plan on only owning Ancients (and the expansions that deal with battles I'm interested in). I'm very much in the minority in this, I know :)


I was concerned about this, too, but my fears were proved quite unfounded. I consider myself a competent C&C:A player but C&C:N has me all at sea and I'm having to start from the beginning. I'm amazed at how some tweaks of the core system can present such a wildly different tactical challenge. I'm not sure C&C:N will ever replace C&C:A in my affections but I'm pleased that it's such a different game to play.

Brent.
6 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Dan
United States
San Francisco
California
flag msg tools
badge
I must think over my position and how I may improve it.
Avatar
mb
Speaking of Plano, Roger, I use plastic bags too. It's so much simpler (if not as pretty) to have all light infantry in one bag and to pull them out by color.
3 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Craig Hebert
United States
Goodlettsville
Tennessee
flag msg tools
badge
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Sticker progress is fricking brilliantly handled!
1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Jeffery Hudson
United States
Washington
Utah
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Fantastic review. I can agree with everything except the map comment. I love the hexboard/seperate terrain system, as I am one of those strange peopl that would enjoy making my own senarios.

Quote:
I'm amazed at how some tweaks of the core system can present such a wildly different tactical challenge.


I've felt this way about all the C&C games. I started with Battlecry and loved it and was completly blown away by battlelore right afterwards. I was floored that such a few simple 'tweaks' could complety change how the game felt and played.

Same thing happened with C&C:A. I finally got used to playing C&C:A and we pulled out C&C:N and again, a few simple changes complety change how the game plays and feels. Richard Borg is a genious and i wish someone would take this system and really run with it as a 'hobby' game.

1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
"L'état, c'est moi."
Canada
Vancouver
BC
flag msg tools
admin
designer
Roger's Reviews: check out my reviews page, right here on BGG!
badge
Caution: May contain wargame like substance
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Barronmore wrote:
Richard Borg is a genious and i wish someone would take this system and really run with it as a 'hobby' game.
Pete Belli has done pretty much just that: The best $317.88 I ever spent on a $35 game!
3 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
ad1642
Canada
Montréal
Québec
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmb
oeolycus wrote:
Speaking of Plano, Roger, I use plastic bags too. It's so much simpler (if not as pretty) to have all light infantry in one bag and to pull them out by color.


Yes! will try this.
I am currently a reformed plano box user, with 3 zip bags, one for each nation.

Game wrap up is very fast
Set-up is a bit slower...

Your suggestion will help with set-up time.




1 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Pawel P
Poland
flag msg tools
mbmbmbmbmb
Nice review.

I think both C&C games are great. Fast, relaxing, fun and simple they have surprisingly high amount of historical credibility and correct 'feel'. I like to play C&C just after some GBOH session :-)

From my own experience: C&C Napoleonics plays quite different from Ancients - which is a very good thing - you know you play stand - alone product not another set of pieces. Is it better than Ancients? I don't think so. Is it a great game? Absolutely. Unless you hate basic engine of the system you will love C&C Napoleonics - as I do.
3 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
"L'état, c'est moi."
Canada
Vancouver
BC
flag msg tools
admin
designer
Roger's Reviews: check out my reviews page, right here on BGG!
badge
Caution: May contain wargame like substance
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
Ashenz wrote:
From my own experience: C&C Napoleonics plays quite different from Ancients - which is a very good thing - you know you play stand - alone product not another set of pieces. Is it better than Ancients? I don't think so. Is it a great game? Absolutely. Unless you hate basic engine of the system you will love C&C Napoleonics - as I do.
Better? Matter of personal preference. Different? Definitely.
3 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Jeffery Hudson
United States
Washington
Utah
flag msg tools
Avatar
mbmbmbmbmb
I think it's a matter of perspective.

I like CC:N better because i like the time period better. My brother in law like CC:N better because he likes that time period better. My other brother in law likes Battlelore better because he likes Scottish dwarfs in kilts. :)

but CC:N is the best because my opinion counts more then theirs. :)
2 
 Thumb up
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Chris Abbey
United Kingdom
flag msg tools


This is a system that I have designed for storing Commands and Colors pieces. It consists of a drawer sleeve with a clear perspex top and a choice of 4 drawers designed to hold the pieces for either the Napoleonic or Ancients version of the game.

Their is also a holder for the cards and hex terrain.

Everything fits in the original box, and the pieces will stay in place in the drawers if you store the box on it's side on a bookshelf.

Here's a link for further details : http://wargamesbuildings.co.uk/epages/950003459.sf/en_GB/?Ob...
10 
 Thumb up
1.00
 tip
 Hide
  • [+] Dice rolls
Front Page | Welcome | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertise | Support BGG | Feeds RSS
Geekdo, BoardGameGeek, the Geekdo logo, and the BoardGameGeek logo are trademarks of BoardGameGeek, LLC.